I meant that they would come up with something to get it done with only
variable modifications. By updating the code. Not by the static + variable
workaround we are doing.
Thanks
Debojyoti
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:14 AM 'Luis Mendoza' via spctools-discuss <
spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com>
This should already be possible with, e.g.
variable_mod02 = 40.000 C 0 3 -1 0 0 0.0
add_C_cysteine = 50.000
(Of course using whatever masses are appropriate.)
Or does this not work?
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 9:31 PM Debojyoti Pal
wrote:
> Thanks Luis. I have asked this on the COMET group as
Thanks Luis. I have asked this on the COMET group as well. They will
probably come up with an update or something to enable it.
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 8:47:46 AM UTC+5:30 Luis Mendoza wrote:
> Hi Debojyoti,
> Yes, I would say this is the most straightforward way of conducting this
>
Hi Debojyoti,
Yes, I would say this is the most straightforward way of conducting this
search.
Note that you may need to make further adjustments to the variable mod
string settings if, say, a given peptide must have *all* of its Cysteines
in one state (+50) or the other (+90). The default is to
Hello everyone
I have a specific scenario where I want to search for peptide in which
cysteine must either have +50 or +90 mod. Basically:
1) Cys can only have one of +50 or +90
2) Cys much have one of +50 or +90 (ie It cannot be unmodified)
Only way I can achieve this is to put a static mod of
