Re: [v2] New license proposal: GNUVerbatim

2017-09-27 Thread John Sullivan
"W. Trevor King" writes: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:04:03AM -0700, Philippe Ombredanne wrote: >> Is this a joke or are you seriously suggesting that you want to >> track the license of licenses? > > It's not a joke. I have a repository that contains two files with > content

Git's COPYING preface (was: [v2] New license proposal: GNUVerbatim)

2017-09-27 Thread W. Trevor King
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:26:10PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:15 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > > I have a repository that contains two files with content under the > > GNUVerbatim license [1,2] (as well as some content by Linus, > > presumably under the GPL-2.0 or a later

Re: [v2] New license proposal: GNUVerbatim

2017-09-27 Thread Kate Stewart
Hi Trevor, On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:15 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:04:03AM -0700, Philippe Ombredanne wrote: > > Is this a joke or are you seriously suggesting that you want to > > track the license of licenses? > > It's not a joke. I have a

Re: [v2] New license proposal: GNUVerbatim

2017-09-27 Thread Philippe Ombredanne
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:22 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > Discussion spawned by my v1 Verbatim proposal [1] seems to have died > down, so here's a v2. Changes since v1: > > * Renamed from ‘Verbatim’ to ‘GNUVerbatim’ to allow for other verbatim > names in the future (e.g. if

[v2] New license proposal: GNUVerbatim

2017-09-26 Thread W. Trevor King
Discussion spawned by my v1 Verbatim proposal [1] seems to have died down, so here's a v2. Changes since v1: * Renamed from ‘Verbatim’ to ‘GNUVerbatim’ to allow for other verbatim names in the future (e.g. if someone wants to register [2] as GNUVerbatimWeb [3] or wants to register non-GNU