"W. Trevor King" writes:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:04:03AM -0700, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
>> Is this a joke or are you seriously suggesting that you want to
>> track the license of licenses?
>
> It's not a joke. I have a repository that contains two files with
> content
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:26:10PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:15 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > I have a repository that contains two files with content under the
> > GNUVerbatim license [1,2] (as well as some content by Linus,
> > presumably under the GPL-2.0 or a later
Hi Trevor,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:15 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:04:03AM -0700, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> > Is this a joke or are you seriously suggesting that you want to
> > track the license of licenses?
>
> It's not a joke. I have a
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:22 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> Discussion spawned by my v1 Verbatim proposal [1] seems to have died
> down, so here's a v2. Changes since v1:
>
> * Renamed from ‘Verbatim’ to ‘GNUVerbatim’ to allow for other verbatim
> names in the future (e.g. if
Discussion spawned by my v1 Verbatim proposal [1] seems to have died
down, so here's a v2. Changes since v1:
* Renamed from ‘Verbatim’ to ‘GNUVerbatim’ to allow for other verbatim
names in the future (e.g. if someone wants to register [2] as
GNUVerbatimWeb [3] or wants to register non-GNU