Hi Trevor, On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:15 PM, W. Trevor King <wk...@tremily.us> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:04:03AM -0700, Philippe Ombredanne wrote: > > Is this a joke or are you seriously suggesting that you want to > > track the license of licenses? > > It's not a joke. I have a repository that contains two files with > content under the GNUVerbatim license [1,2] (as well as some content > by Linus, presumably under the GPL-2.0 or a later version at the > discretion of Linus) [3]. I'd like to track the licensing information > for those files/snippets without using LicenseRef-*. Is that a > use-case the SPDX wants to enable or not? > The legal team reviewed and approved "Linux-syscall-note" to be used "WITH" licenses, that should be able to handle the kernel case. ie. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note See: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2017-07-06 It should be available in the next version of the license list. Is there an aspect you think that it won't handle? Kate > > > [1]: https://github.com/wking/signed-off-by/blob/0ad11f9d733925a7 > 6c5ecb772947faebdbfe04ef/Documentation/developer-certificate > -of-origin#L1-L35 > [2]: https://github.com/wking/signed-off-by/blob/0ad11f9d733925a7 > 6c5ecb772947faebdbfe04ef/COPYING#L22-L360 > [3]: https://github.com/wking/signed-off-by/blob/0ad11f9d733925a7 > 6c5ecb772947faebdbfe04ef/COPYING#L1-L18 > > -- > This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). > For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy > > _______________________________________________ > Spdx-legal mailing list > Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org > https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal > >
_______________________________________________ Spdx-legal mailing list Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
