t 20, 2023, at 10:46 AM, 'Tony Cosentini' via sqlalchemy wrote:
>
> Oh I see, thanks for clarifying.
>
> I'm trying to detect cases where we depend on the autoflush behavior. For
> example, in the sample above, when the query runs with no_autoflush, we
> won'
so I was trying to automate finding these
cases in order to add explicit flush calls when needed or just pass in the
pending object instead of running a query.
Tony
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 10:42 PM Mike Bayer <
mike_not_on_goo...@zzzcomputing.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 202
ke_not_on_goo...@zzzcomputing.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023, at 8:08 AM, 'Tony Cosentini' via sqlalchemy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to listen for an event for when a query result gets
> merged into a pre-existing object in the session?
>
>
> this
Hi,
Is there any way to listen for an event for when a query result gets merged
into a pre-existing object in the session?
I'm working on disabling autoflush for some of our codebase (mostly to cut
down on queries on a high QPS path), but before doing that I want to write
a utility to detect w
pper so that you can apply
> things after the fact, a good event for this would be "instrument_class":
> https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/20/orm/events.html#sqlalchemy.orm.MapperEvents.instrument_class
>
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2023, at 4:18 AM, 'Tony Cosentini' vi
Hi,
I have a pattern in some models where there is a private (as in prefixed
with __) relationship and then a property to handle some things that need
to happen when the relationship is fetched or written to.
Currently it's implemented like this:
class ModelClass(Base):
__field_for_relationsh
try adding
> session.expunge_all() before the query and see if that makes things look
> more expected.
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023, at 1:27 AM, 'Tony Cosentini' via sqlalchemy wrote:
>
> Ok, I was able to at least create a script that easily reproduces what I'm
>
It sounds bizarre,
but that gist link contains a really short sample that reproduces the same
behavior. I'm running 1.4.44.
Tony
On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 11:09:40 AM UTC+8 Tony Cosentini wrote:
> Funny enough, this is what I tried. I just wrote up a small sample script
&
Funny enough, this is what I tried. I just wrote up a small sample script
using defaultload + load_only and sure enough it works. There must be
something in the code base I'm working with that prevents the load_only bit
from being applied. I'm pretty sure defaultload is woroking fine. I'll
repo
Hi,
This might be a strange question, but I tried to find this in the
documentation to no avail.
Is it possible to use something like load_only to override which columns
are loaded in when loading a relationship (as in, a relationship that is
not loaded at first with the original query)?
Some
do :).
Thanks again for helping look into this,
Tony
On Monday, November 14, 2022 at 3:43:53 PM UTC+8 Tony Cosentini wrote:
> Oh wow, this sounds like it would definitely impact us. I'm out this week
> travelling, but I will definitely upgrade + re-enable the cache and report
&g
m/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/issues/8790.
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022, at 8:33 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022, at 3:11 AM, 'Tony Cosentini' via sqlalchemy wrote:
>
> Hey, sorry for the crazy delay on this!
>
> We ended up turning off the cache i
nyone else that runs into these kinds of issues.
Thanks again Mike for the helpful response!
Tony
On Friday, October 21, 2022 at 8:08:32 PM UTC+8 Tony Cosentini wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for such a fast reply! We tried setting query_cache_size on a
> canary environment today,
ne is more of a theory though).
I'll report back if we see any changes.
Thanks again for the fast reply (and for building such a useful + well
documented library),
Tony
On Friday, October 21, 2022 at 12:20:07 PM UTC+8 Mike Bayer wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022, at 12:00
Hi,
We recently upgraded our application (a Flask web app) from SQLAlchemy
1.3.19 to 1.4.41.
Overall things are stable, but we have noticed a very large increase in
memory use:
[image: Screen Shot 2022-10-21 at 11.26.18 AM.png]
Is this from the new query caching feature? I'm planning on gettin
t;
> I think overall the issue is that you have a _finalize_fairy with a
> rollback happening at all. I could see that happening if you had a
> greenlet interrupted but otherwise we would assume your code gracefully
> closes all Sessions / Connections .
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020, at
Hi all,
Apologies for the long-winded question. I'm currently working on an
application that uses SQLAlchemy along with gevent + psycogreen + gunicorn.
I recently added a pool_recycle of 120 to one of our engines:
engine = create_engine(
db_url,
pool_size=default_manager.database_pool_si
17 matches
Mail list logo