On 12/5/2013 20:31, Stephen Chrzanowski wrote:
@Warren>
the package/sandbox idea won't work due to certain
constraints the OS puts on the file.
Quoting the Apple docs[1] Doug pointed to: "...you can access the
document's contents using any appropriate file-system routines."
I'd like to see
On 6 Dec 2013, at 3:31am, Stephen Chrzanowski wrote:
> It was mentioned in another thread, of this exact subject (I think this is
> the third thread?) that the package/sandbox idea won't work due to certain
> constraints the OS puts on the file.
On one hand, you can't keep
@Warren>
It was mentioned in another thread, of this exact subject (I think this is
the third thread?) that the package/sandbox idea won't work due to certain
constraints the OS puts on the file. I don't recall what the reason was,
exactly, as I've never used a Mac for any kind of considerable
On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:55 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 12/5/2013 17:00, Scott Robison wrote:
>> Might there be a way to implement a custom VFS for Mac to deal with this?
>
> Wouldn't it be a lot simpler to just put the DB file into a Mac package (i.e.
> directory) so the
Hi,
I noticed that some of my views were not working with sqlite 3.8.1. I managed
to isolate the problem in the simple test case below.
Then I discovered that the 3.8.2 pre-release seems to do it right. I suspect
it was fixed along with https://www.sqlite.org/src/tktview?name=c620261b5b
but I
On 12/5/2013 8:39 PM, Hayden Livingston wrote:
If I have my data structured like
Col1
"FooId", "Value1", "Value2", "Value3"
I can do group by (Col1) and show this data on a graph. Imagine Col1 is the
timestamp field, I could split it into hour groups and show rates of
On 12/5/2013 17:00, Scott Robison wrote:
Might there be a way to implement a custom VFS for Mac to deal with this?
Wouldn't it be a lot simpler to just put the DB file into a Mac package
(i.e. directory) so the associated WAL and whatever other files get
created in the package, too?
I wasn't trying to suggest it be added to an official VFS shipped with
SQLite. Just pondering if there might be a way for people who want or need
such functionality to integrate it cleanly via the VFS mechanism.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> On 6
If I have my data structured like
Col1
"FooId", "Value1", "Value2", "Value3"
I can do group by (Col1) and show this data on a graph. Imagine Col1 is the
timestamp field, I could split it into hour groups and show rates of
somethings. Like orders per hour rate.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013
On 12/5/2013 14:45, Klaas V wrote:
Warren wrote 4 dec 2013:
| There are tiny corners of the programming world (FP) where this is not the
case, but then you get into
| questions of purity, and databases are about as far from side-effect-free
as you can get.
That's a wee bit exaggerated,
On 12/5/2013 7:16 PM, Hayden Livingston wrote:
I suppose I should have stated my goal even further. I'm putting them in
sql so that I can query it row by row (i.e. operationId by operationId), as
opposed to SELECT all operationIds, then foreach operation id select all
rows where operationid =
On 6 Dec 2013, at 12:00am, Scott Robison wrote:
> Might there be a way to implement a custom VFS for Mac to deal with this?
One problem is that to be able to call fsevents you have to link in a huge
amount of the standard Mac support some of which isn't accessible
I suppose I should have stated my goal even further. I'm putting them in
sql so that I can query it row by row (i.e. operationId by operationId), as
opposed to SELECT all operationIds, then foreach operation id select all
rows where operationid = ...
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Igor
Might there be a way to implement a custom VFS for Mac to deal with this?
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:55 PM, William Garrison <1billgarri...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Thursday, December 5, 2013, L. Wood wrote:
>
> > A fact of reality: Documents can be moved by the program's users.
> >
> > The database
On Thursday, December 5, 2013, L. Wood wrote:
> A fact of reality: Documents can be moved by the program's users.
>
> The database should not be corruptible in this case. At most, I should get
> errors from SQLite that I can handle gracefully.
>
> This is a normal thing. We are simply driving our
Warren wrote 4 dec 2013:
| There are tiny corners of the programming world (FP) where this is not the
case, but then you get into
| questions of purity, and databases are about as far from side-effect-free
as you can get.
That's a wee bit exaggerated, but who am I to start a discussion;
On 12/5/2013 4:31 PM, Hayden Livingston wrote:
--> End Goal:
A SQL Table:
FooId,SomeStringValue,SomeIntValue,SomeOtherColumn,WhateverColumnNameItNeedsTo,
You do not want a table with an open-ended set of columns - SQL doesn't
work that way. You want a fixed schema; let the number of rows be
Ok. We have a bunch of different components in our system that write about
a particular investment. These components know nothing about each other,
except the item they are operating on.
Let's take 3 components: ComponentA, ComponentB, ComponentC -- all of these
write a "FLAT FILE"! We then parse
> Simon wrote:
>
> Doesn't help. Because the corruption can happen
> if the journal file is moved after the app has crashed.
> And if the app has crashed it doesn't have any of the files
> open and can't monitor them being moved.
D. Richard Hipp's scenario was not about "our" program crashing.
Apologies, my mail is slow today, did not notice this thread had progressed
significantly before I posted - please ignore previous.
I'm with Igor though, the multi-table layout you now have is even less convenient than the matrix - It's equally dispersed data only
now you have to join 3
Yes, I did test SQLCipher and it slows down a bit.
Now, I would like to go with SEE if its available for the latest version.
SQLCipher is available for 3.8.0.2 while 3.8.1 is out.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> On 5 Dec 2013, at 3:02pm, Raheel
One PIVOT-ing approach is per-item selects when you don't know the subject
value - this is an exact version of your question:
CREATE TABLE `temptest` (
`ID` INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
`Col1` TEXT,
`Col2` TEXT,
`Col3` TEXT,
`Value` TEXT
);
INSERT INTO `temptest` (`Col1`, `Col2`, `Col3`, `Value`)
On 12/5/2013 1:43 PM, Hayden Livingston wrote:
Yes, are moving our sparse matrix to different tables:
Id | RelationalIdentifier | ColA
1aX
2bA
Id | RelationalIdentifier | ColB
1aY
2b
Thanks, Igor.
Yes, are moving our sparse matrix to different tables:
Id | RelationalIdentifier | ColA
1aX
2bA
Id | RelationalIdentifier | ColB
1aY
2bB
On 12/5/2013 1:15 PM, Hayden Livingston wrote:
I have a table schema such like
ID | Col1 | Col2 | Col3 | Value
1 anull nullX
2 null a nullY
3 null null a Z
4 b nullnull A
5 null b nullB
6
I have a table schema such like
ID | Col1 | Col2 | Col3 | Value
1 anull nullX
2 null a nullY
3 null null a Z
4 b nullnull A
5 null b nullB
6 null null b C
Right now these are in
On 2013/12/05 16:40, L. Wood wrote:
Could you be clear on what issue it is that you want
solved, and how your proposal solves it any better than
what is currently being done ?
L. Wood:
We are trying to find ways to avoid the corruption problem that D. Richard Hipp
outlined. See his steps
On 5 Dec 2013, at 2:40pm, L. Wood wrote:
> We are trying to find ways to avoid the corruption problem that D. Richard
> Hipp outlined. See his steps (1)-(5) in a previous post.
Okay. Sorry, but this is not possible using a client/client DBMS and a setup
where your users
Hi,
The only problem is that I dont have access to SEE by Dr. Richard. So how
should I test it ? Does he give test licenses ? Also I am assuming it will
always be supported by the latest version of SQLite right ?
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> On
> Simon Slavin wrote:
> Could you be clear on what issue it is that you want
> solved, and how your proposal solves it any better than
> what is currently being done ?
We are trying to find ways to avoid the corruption problem that D. Richard Hipp
outlined. See his steps (1)-(5) in a previous
I'm using Windows 7, sqlite 3.7.17 compiled with a VS 2010.
When writing in a sqlite database configured with
SQLITE_CONFIG_MMAP_SIZE, the database file atribute "Last Modified" isnt
updated. According to 'MapViewOfFile' documentation [1],
"When modifying a file through a mapped view, the
Compile ? >? if your using windows you dont need to Compile SQLITE just use
http://www.sqlite.org/2013/sqlite-dll-win32-x86-3080100.zip
if you need to Compile the C++ Source
just use a few free C++ Compilers available on the internet
http://www.bloodshed.net/download.html
--
View this
On 5 Dec 2013, at 9:15am, Raheel Gupta wrote:
> Yes, I agree. But it should not make the inserts and read too slow as well.
The key word here is 'too'. If there's only 5% difference in speed between the
two systems then it doesn't matter which one you use.
So you have
I was not aware of such!!! Thanks!
LS
2013/12/5 Hick Gunter
> CAST supplies an affinity to the operand, which forces the comparison to
> be made with affinity. And since the constants transform into each other,
> the comparison succeeds.
>
> explain SELECT CAST(123 AS
CAST supplies an affinity to the operand, which forces the comparison to be
made with affinity. And since the constants transform into each other, the
comparison succeeds.
explain SELECT CAST(123 AS INT)='123';
addr opcode p1p2p3p4 p5 comment
Luís Simão wrote:
> SELECT 123='123'; // 0
> SELECT CAST(123 AS NUMERIC)='123'; // 1 ???
>
> How is this possible?
Plain 123 or '123' has affinity NONE.
CAST(123 AS NUMERIC) has affinity NUMERIC, so the string gets
automatically converted for the comparison.
See
I found this strange behavior in SQLite:
While testing whether SQLite performs cast before comparison or just return
0, I entered following:
SELECT CAST(123 AS INT)='123';
And for my surprise, it returned 1!!!
However, my previous tests checked that numeric/text comparisons always
returned
NO.
ORDER BY is satisfied either by an index or by a separate sorting step,
depending on whatever indexes are present or maybe even created on the fly by
SQLite. The choice affects the generated SQL byte code (=the prepared
statement), so it would have to re-prepare the statement anyway.
Hi,
select * from emp order by empid desc; //here empid is column name among
clolumns.
Now, I want to write prepared statement for above query.
select * from emp order by ? ?; //I want to substitute column name and
sorting preference.
is it possible with sqlite?
thanks,
a
Yes, I agree. But it should not make the inserts and read too slow as well.
I just want to support 256 Bit AES.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Klaas V wrote:
> When you'use the word 'perfornance' you might be interested not jonly in
> speed, but in strength of
When you'use the word 'perfornance' you might be interested not jonly in speed,
but in strength of protection, privacy of the employees, your company as a
whole and above all your clients.
One of the goals of encryption is to avoid e.g. the government(s and the spies
they hired to peek into
41 matches
Mail list logo