[sqlite] [Gauging interest in patches...]: are published at fossil repository

2009-12-17 Thread Alexey Pechnikov
Hello! On Tuesday 15 December 2009 19:05:31 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > Maintaining a fork of SQLite using Fossil is not difficult. A sketch > of one solution can be found at http://www.sqlite.org/ > privatebranch.html and there is an updated version of that document > at

Re: [sqlite] Gauging interest in patches...

2009-12-16 Thread WClark
> - Message from Alexey Pechnikov <pechni...@mobigroup.ru> on Tue, > 15 Dec 2009 22:14:07 +0300 - > > To: > > General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org> > > Subject: > > Re: [sqlite] Gauging interest in patches... > &g

Re: [sqlite] Gauging interest in patches...

2009-12-15 Thread Alexey Pechnikov
Hello! On Tuesday 15 December 2009 19:05:31 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > Maintaining a fork of SQLite using Fossil is not difficult. The are some problems of usage: 1. Then I use reverse proxy-server Fossil does not check the existence of X-Forwarded-For header and does not ask login/password. Yes,

Re: [sqlite] Gauging interest in patches...

2009-12-15 Thread Alexey Pechnikov
Hello! On Tuesday 15 December 2009 19:05:31 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > Maintaining a fork of SQLite using Fossil is not difficult. A sketch > of one solution can be found at http://www.sqlite.org/ > privatebranch.html and there is an updated version of that document > at

Re: [sqlite] Gauging interest in patches...

2009-12-15 Thread Alexey Pechnikov
Hello! On Tuesday 15 December 2009 18:35:18 wcl...@gfs-hofheim.de wrote: > I have made you a patch file for just the READONLY and ENFORCE table > constraints. Please send me the original patch. All features are interesting and I want to test them. > I think if I post the patch here it will get

Re: [sqlite] Gauging interest in patches...

2009-12-15 Thread Alexey Pechnikov
Hello! On Tuesday 15 December 2009 19:17:31 wcl...@gfs-hofheim.de wrote: > Trying to attach a non-existent database as "readonly" will return the > error "unable to open database file". This message is not helpful becouse is used in other situations. Is it possible to change it? Best

Re: [sqlite] Gauging interest in patches...

2009-12-15 Thread WClark
D. Richard Hipp wrote on 15/12/2009 17:05:31: > (1) Have your patches been fully documented and have you generated > automated test cases that provide 100% MC/DC and branch test > coverage? I'm guessing not and yet those are requirements for new > features in the core. I believe they are

Re: [sqlite] Gauging interest in patches...

2009-12-15 Thread WClark
Alexey Pechnikov wrote on 15/12/2009 15:15:42: >> 3. ENFORCE constraint for table columns, for example: CREATE TABLE t(i >> enforce integer, j enforce text). This optional constraint enforces type >> checking so that an entry must match the column type (i.e. integer, real, >> numeric, text,

Re: [sqlite] Gauging interest in patches...

2009-12-15 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On Dec 15, 2009, at 8:26 AM, wcl...@gfs-hofheim.de wrote: > > This is a quick email just to gauge interest in a number of patches > I've > created for Sqlite over the last year or so. Your best bet would probably be to clone the SQLite Fossil repository and publish your own private branch as

Re: [sqlite] Gauging interest in patches...

2009-12-15 Thread WClark
John Brooks wrote on 15/12/2009 15:13:05: > I love the idea of READONLY and ENFORCE. I would certainly make use of > those in amalgamation form. What license do you put these under? > > You should really publish these all somewhere, there are some great > features. Good work. Thank you. I have

Re: [sqlite] Gauging interest in patches...

2009-12-15 Thread Alexey Pechnikov
Hello! On Tuesday 15 December 2009 16:26:00 wcl...@gfs-hofheim.de wrote: > 3. ENFORCE constraint for table columns, for example: CREATE TABLE t(i > enforce integer, j enforce text). This optional constraint enforces type > checking so that an entry must match the column type (i.e. integer,

[sqlite] Gauging interest in patches...

2009-12-15 Thread WClark
Hi all, This is a quick email just to gauge interest in a number of patches I've created for Sqlite over the last year or so. What I want to know is whether anyone would like me to post one or more of these patches here? I have thought about posting to http://www.sqlite.org/contrib but since