Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-23 Thread Bert Verhees
>> It seems to me that all the people send theiur ewmail double, and that >> it >> is a failure in the list software configuration. >> >> This email has only one TO: sqlite-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> And no CC or BCC, thus, if this is posted twice, it is the list software > > Ever thought that it

Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-23 Thread Mrs. Brisby
On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 16:23, Bert Verhees wrote: > > It seems to me that all the people send theiur ewmail double, and that it > > is a failure in the list software configuration. > > > > This email has only one TO: sqlite-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > And no CC or BCC, thus, if this is posted twic

RE: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-22 Thread Allan Edwards
] Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 4:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sqlite] double email On 22 Nov 2003 at 22:23, Bert Verhees wrote: > > It seems to me that all the people send theiur ewmail double, and > > that it is a failure in the list software configuration. > >

Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-22 Thread Bernie Cosell
On 22 Nov 2003 at 22:23, Bert Verhees wrote: > > It seems to me that all the people send theiur ewmail double, and that it > > is a failure in the list software configuration. > > > > This email has only one TO: sqlite-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > And no CC or BCC, thus, if this is posted twice,

Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-22 Thread Richard Heyes
> It seems to me that all the people send theiur ewmail double, and that it > is a failure in the list software configuration. > > This email has only one TO: sqlite-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > And no CC or BCC, thus, if this is posted twice, it is the list software Ever thought that it might be s

Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-22 Thread Bert Verhees
> It seems to me that all the people send theiur ewmail double, and that it > is a failure in the list software configuration. > > This email has only one TO: sqlite-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > And no CC or BCC, thus, if this is posted twice, it is the list software > > kind regards > Bert Verhees

Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-22 Thread Bert Verhees
It seems to me that all the people send theiur ewmail double, and that it is a failure in the list software configuration. This email has only one TO: sqlite-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> And no CC or BCC, thus, if this is posted twice, it is the list software kind regards Bert Verhees -

Re: [sqlite] Re: [inbox] Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-21 Thread Michael Hunley
At 12:27 PM 11/21/2003 -0800, Will Leshner wrote: But wouldn't that only work in the case where the list machine also handles all of our individual accounts? I would think our email clients simply send the email out to both addresses and they have no way of knowing it actually ends up in the sam

Re: [sqlite] Re: [inbox] Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-21 Thread Scott Lamb
Will Leshner wrote: On Nov 21, 2003, at 12:04 PM, Michael Hunley wrote: Actually, it is the practice of replying to all that is causing the double send. I got yours twice. Once for your reply to me and again because I am on the list. The right answer is for the list to see that an address on

Re: [sqlite] Re: [inbox] Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-21 Thread Will Leshner
On Nov 21, 2003, at 12:04 PM, Michael Hunley wrote: At 12:49 PM 11/21/2003 -0600, Scott Lamb wrote: Many people (myself included) prefer it the way this list does it. I'm on a lot of lists which are sorted into subfolders. If you send a message to the list, I might or might not see it. If you "r

Re: [sqlite] Re: [inbox] Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-21 Thread Michael Hunley
At 12:49 PM 11/21/2003 -0600, Scott Lamb wrote: Many people (myself included) prefer it the way this list does it. I'm on a lot of lists which are sorted into subfolders. If you send a message to the list, I might or might not see it. If you "reply all" to a message of mine (or to a "reply all"

Re: [sqlite] Re: [inbox] Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-21 Thread Scott Lamb
On Nov 21, 2003, at 11:48 AM, Michael Hunley wrote: While I am occupying people's time, does anyone know why this list does not do as others do and make the email reply-to address be the list instead of the individual who sent it? That is much more generally beneficial and less error-prone for

[sqlite] Re: [inbox] Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-21 Thread Michael Hunley
At 05:35 PM 11/21/2003 +0100, you wrote: Will you stop sending your emails twice, this one, I also got twice I am only getting them once. Are others getting them twice? Bert, are you sure it is not something going on in your email server? Or perhaps a double email address mapping in the list?

Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-21 Thread Bert Verhees
> Bert Verhees wrote: >> It would be nice if people would stop sending their emails twice to this >> list, and also would put off their read or deliver notification > > And learn to quote. And not top-post. > > -- Gerhard OK, I will not top-quote Will you stop sending your emails twice, this one,

Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-21 Thread Noel Frankinet
And learn to quote. And not top-post. Up to now, this list was immune of cyber cop. Let us work Noël - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [sqlite] double email

2003-11-21 Thread Gerhard Häring
Bert Verhees wrote: It would be nice if people would stop sending their emails twice to this list, and also would put off their read or deliver notification And learn to quote. And not top-post. -- Gerhard - To unsubscribe, e-mai

[sqlite] double email

2003-11-21 Thread Bert Verhees
It would be nice if people would stop sending their emails twice to this list, and also would put off their read or deliver notification thanks Bert Verhees > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying SQLite with Zope > > You're using PySQLite, right? > >> and it works fine, but when