As you can tell from this forum, locking and synchronization is the area
where there is least intuitive understanding among users and is the most
consistent source of problems. There must be a deep psychological reason.
I don't think it's deep really, just the most complex part to understand.
Jay Sprenkle wrote:
On 8/29/06, John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thankyou. The Firefox people have merely removed their dependance upon
an unreliable resource, cross OS file locking. A prudent design choice.
If they come up with an elegant distributed lock protocol it would be
worth
On 8/29/06, John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thankyou. The Firefox people have merely removed their dependance upon
an unreliable resource, cross OS file locking. A prudent design choice.
If they come up with an elegant distributed lock protocol it would be
worth propagating
Thankyou. The Firefox people have merely removed their dependance upon
an unreliable resource, cross OS file locking. A prudent design choice.
If they come up with an elegant distributed lock protocol it would be
worth propagating universally in the light of the success of Firefox and
its
Ritesh Kapoor wrote:
Can you - DRH or someone else provide some more background information
on why locking dosen't work on NFS mounted file systems.
I just tried to find out what the locking problem was but couldn't find
a web page discussing it in any detail. Lots of pages saying there *was*
"Jay Sprenkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you run two instances of firefox you trash
> your own database.
No, you didn't read what I said. Firefox implements their
own locking mechanism, so two instances of firefox will
play nicely together. The problem is when some other
application,
On 8/29/06, Ritesh Kapoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you - DRH or someone else provide some more background information
on why locking dosen't work on NFS mounted file systems.
If its a known issue then is there an SQLite compile time option that
would remove locking - i couldn't find one.
On 8/29/06, John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jay Sprenkle wrote:
>
> If it breaks because of something you did, then YOU are the bum.
> If it's broken because of the operating system THEY are the bums.
>
Having someone to blame still doesn't make it work. They are have made
the rational
Can you - DRH or someone else provide some more background information
on why locking dosen't work on NFS mounted file systems.
If its a known issue then is there an SQLite compile time option that
would remove locking - i couldn't find one.
When I got stuck with this problem I had to remove all
Jay Sprenkle wrote:
The problem is that they have to work on broken operating
systems. I don't know of another way to patch around the
problem. Do you?
nope.
If it breaks because of something you did, then YOU are the bum.
If it's broken because of the operating system THEY are the bums.
The problem is that they have to work on broken operating
systems. I don't know of another way to patch around the
problem. Do you?
nope.
If it breaks because of something you did, then YOU are the bum.
If it's broken because of the operating system THEY are the bums.
"Jay Sprenkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let me emphasize that everything in the previous paragraph is
> > hearsay and supposition and could be wildly incorrect.
>
> Thanks Dr.H.
>
> I hope it's not true. If it's true It really
"Jay Sprenkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good morning all,
>
> I'm in the design stage of a project and had a question about sqlite
> shared-cache mode.
> The new version of firefox will use mozStorage, which is based on
> sqlite using shared-cache mode. I want other programs to be able
>
in advance.
Marc Ruff
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jay Sprenkle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. August 2006 19:07
An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Betreff: [sqlite] sqlite shared-cache mode usage
Good morning all,
I'm in the design stage of a project and had a question
Good morning all,
I'm in the design stage of a project and had a question about sqlite
shared-cache mode.
The new version of firefox will use mozStorage, which is based on
sqlite using shared-cache mode. I want other programs to be able
read/write to the database but I was told this might
be a
15 matches
Mail list logo
