Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-12 Thread Gary
11:20 AM Subject: RE: Accucraft vs Roundhouse My Roundhouse Colonial sees far more running than my Ida and Exclesior for these same reasons, It will run for 30 minutes with only an occasional stop for some more meths. I do a lot of cussing when I run the gas burners, once the wicks are initially

RE: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-12 Thread Ciambrone, Steve @ OS
My Roundhouse Colonial sees far more running than my Ida and Exclesior for these same reasons, It will run for 30 minutes with only an occasional stop for some more meths. I do a lot of cussing when I run the gas burners, once the wicks are initially adjusted on a meths burner they have a very co

Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-12 Thread J.D. Toumanian
Hello Group, Since we're on the subject, I'll air my only real complaint with Roundhouse... They have no functioning crossheads on the cylinders. Because of this, the rear covers wear oblong and quickly develop leaks. (particularly if you run frequently and pull heavy trains, as I did with mine)

Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-12 Thread Tag Gorton
On 12/11/02 2:21, "Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks to Trot the opinionated, I now know RH manufactures models made for > continued operation, while Accucraft manufactures a working model, that > requires higher repair costs to keep the model operational as wear exacts > it's inevitable t

Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-11 Thread Landon Solomon
Just to add to that, Accucraft has already replaced one set of pistons for free. I don't know what the future will hold in that regard, but I can't imagine them doing it forever. ;] Trot, the fox with another leak... somewhere... {:( At 08:21 PM 11/11/02, you wrote: Thanks to Trot the opinio

Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-11 Thread Gary
Thanks to Trot the opinionated, I now know RH manufactures models made for continued operation, while Accucraft manufactures a working model, that requires higher repair costs to keep the model operational as wear exacts it's inevitable toll.

Accucraft vs. Roundhouse

2002-11-11 Thread Don Plasterer
My hat is off to Accucraft. While I feel their quality still lags behind Roundhouse ( I have 2 Accucraft & 2 Roundhouse) I believe they have come a long way in the short time they have been in the live steam business. And they seem to be committed to improving their product quality. More impo

Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-11 Thread Landon Solomon
Sure I can. The Roundhouse Sammie doesn't seem to have the issue I've seen. :) That's RH's lower-end loco. So far I haven't seen anything different in any of the Accucraft offerings in the say of piston-rod seals than what the Ruby has. Does the superior offer something other than a metal-

Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-11 Thread Phil Paskos
Of course Tag is right about the RH's dropping oil between the rails. The first day I ran my SR#24 I found myself being concerned that the lubricator wasn't working correctly. When I checked the reservoir it was going down and the engine was working well. It wasn't until I took it off the track to

Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-11 Thread Kevin Strong
The Accucraft v. Roundhouse debate can't be answered right now. That can only be answered in a few years, after the earliest Accucrafts (of which I have one) have been run into the ground the same way Roundhouse locos have been over the years. It's a lot like those "initial satisfaction" statemen

Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-11 Thread Tag Gorton
On 11/11/02 18:35, "Landon Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd have to vote for Roundhouse being best. My Ruby leaks like a sieve... > but I don't even have my RH engine together yet so I can't say much. ;] > > Trot, the slowly-planning, fox... Cannot really compare a bottom of the range

Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-11 Thread Landon Solomon
I'd have to vote for Roundhouse being best. My Ruby leaks like a sieve... but I don't even have my RH engine together yet so I can't say much. ;] Trot, the slowly-planning, fox... At 02:36 PM 11/10/02, you wrote: Chuck's "My Best" "we should be arguing that Roundhouse is better than Accucraft

Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-11 Thread Tag Gorton
On 11/11/02 5:31, "Phil Paskos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > O.K. I'll bite on this one too. I've never seen any Roundhouse that spewed > oil all over the track. Also, the expression" runs like a Roundhouse" is a > compliment on their design and quality control that they deserve. > Phil > Hmmm.

Re: Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-10 Thread Phil Paskos
O.K. I'll bite on this one too. I've never seen any Roundhouse that spewed oil all over the track. Also, the expression" runs like a Roundhouse" is a compliment on their design and quality control that they deserve. Phil > Chuck's "My Best" "we should be arguing that Roundhouse is better than > A

Accucraft vs Roundhouse

2002-11-10 Thread Gary
Chuck's "My Best" "we should be arguing that Roundhouse is better than Accucraft " OK Chuck, I'll bite. How is Roundhouse better than Accucraft? I was drooling over the new Accucraft Shay. If I am better off saving a bit more for a Roundhouse #24 or Forney, please wax eloquent and make your res