Hi Ferd,
I tried replying offline to your personnal e mail address, but my
server cannot find yours as seein "Permenant failure, bad destract in
system address".
Could you try sending offline to me instead, and I will try replying
back again.
Maybe the Tri-x is polluted with Pixels!.
Peter Trounce wrote:
> Like most folk new to digital photography, I have struggled with the
> difference from film cameras.
A good summary, Peter.
wg
Like most folk new to digital photography, I have struggled with the
difference from film cameras.
The long time delay on taking a picture. I have since followed the manual
(!!!) and when needed push the button down halfway to give the camera time
to do its thinking, then the rest of the way to tak
In a message dated 3/10/03 10:07:35 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< You can get blurred pictures using digital cameras because there is a
delay after you press the shutter, while the camera adjusts exposure,
etc >>
My camera, a Cannon A-5 (old!) has the ability to focus o
Harley Kelsey wrote:
>
> You can get blurred pictures using digital cameras because there is a
> delay after you press the shutter, while the camera adjusts exposure,
> etc.
Yes and no... The blurring isn't because of any delay between when you
push the button and when the image is captured -
Hi Harley
Great pointers, another great help is using a tripod as much as
possible.
cheers Ferd.
You can get blurred pictures using digital cameras because there is a
delay after you press the shutter, while the camera adjusts exposure,
etc. Using a flash reduces this but I like to shoot without flash. This
delay is hard to get used to if you are a 35mm film camera user. You
click the shutter
Hi Ken
I have not tried it myself and have seen many great results from others
who
have have files printed by a lab. Future Shop and others similar allow
you to
email the files and they mail the hard copy on photo paper to you.
I find it easier to tweak the images on the Epson and have had great
Hi Art
In the pro world the opposite is true - everything I shoot goes onto
press
in some form or other. (magazine,packaging,adds,catalog etc..) - A
digital file
photographed with a good digital camera has superior quality to a drum
scanned
piece of film. The pixel structure is much cleaner - Pr
I own an Olympus C-3040 Zoom (3.3 mega pixel) and haven't noticed any
problems with stop action pics (I think the digital is as good as my 35mm
cameras (an Olympus point-and-shoot and a Canon SLR)). This 3040 is packed
with features and operated fully automatic or with manual control. Every
featu
- Original Message -
From: "FBM Studios" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of sslivesteam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: steamup photography
> contact with are designed for pro use a mimic the trad
Hi Gary
Does the camera allow manual ISO settings ( Set the ISO to the highest
possible
to allow for a faster shutter speed ?)
Sounds like the camera is selecting too slow a shutter speed.
The only way to overcome this is having a camera that allows control
over
the shutter / aperature selection.
Fred question:
I am having blurred pictures every time I take a picture of a moving steam
engine outdoors.
As a result, I am switching back to film for any moving shots, since I can
set shutter speed
and F stop to compensate for speed. Digital camera is a Sony Cyber-shot 3.2
megapixel
with outdoor
FWIW
For those of you who saw Carol's print of the Diamondhead 2002 group photo
at Diamondhead 2003 ... the print was done on an Epson Photo Stylus
1280. I have to admit to having groused a bit when she went for the larger
printer ... but when used with appropriate papers and inks the res
At 11:55 AM -0800 3/7/03, Anthony Dixon wrote:
I am talking in terms of 10 x 8 to 16 x 12 print sizes, not postcards.
personally, i'm not a big consumer of prints in the 8x10 and larger range.
in experimenting with the new camera, i made a photo that shirleen
was so pleased with that i actual
Hi Phil
I would agree. Home and hobby use are very different from
pro use. As a rule the smallest size I use for jobs is 20mb. and the
largest I have worked with is 1.2gb. For 5x7's and even 8X10's you can
pull great prints off a 3 megapixel camera. (I also spend 8-12 hours a
day
working in Adob
You can get some very good pictures with a 3 megapixel camera. I don't know
how fussy you are. I still don't think a digital camera in the hobby price
range will compete with a 35mm Nikon with fine grain photo film especially
in the 8X10 or 16X12 sizes you are referring to. Like everything else, th
Hi Tony
Nearly all the professional photographers I know (myself included)
use Epson printers. I have both the 1280 and the 2000 printers. Both
produce prints that will challenge and in the 2000 case beat the quality
of any 35mm negative enlarged to 11X14. The one word of caution is
that digital c
Hi Trent, Dave et al,
As with high quality 35mm film cameras, Nikon etc. the end results are
totally dependant on the quality of the lens in the enlarger being
comparable to the original photographic lens.
Therefore, I would be interested in knowing which colour printers and
paper do you g
Hello Dave,
Thanks for the additional information. It gives me a lot more confidence in
the 3 Megapixel market.
I'm currently considering the Sony Mavica CD-400, but haven't convinced
myself to make the purchase. I'll definitely take a closer look at the Fuji S602
now that I've seen actu
At 1:04 PM -0600 3/4/03, Trent Dowler wrote:
Hello Dave,
Do you mind to give me an insight on what camera you used at the
Liebowitz steamup? The macro photo of the smokebox door really sparked
an interest since that seems to be where my digital camera falls short
of acceptable. Good, clear, hi
21 matches
Mail list logo
