Re: [Standards] XEP-0313: why it is *really* not a good idea to use MAM with Pubsub

Hello, I think it is a good idea for there to be a search extension for pubsub. One thing to keep in mind would be is that the extension could become really complicated depending on the search fields that you are going to have and the type of filter you want. If there are user defined fields,

Re: [Standards] XEP-0234 Jingle File Transfer 0.16

I vote for not moving towards supporting :4. There isn't a compelling reason to do it. So it is better to wait until (or if) there features are supported in the next version or in some other XEP. On 20/06/15 16:13, Daniel Gultsch wrote: 2015-06-20 21:59 GMT+02:00 Yann Leboulanger

Re: [Standards] wiki for xeps

Just as an experiment to see how the procedure could be improved. Of course, xsf could implement it if you are inclined to do it. Although, you'd have to be aware of the costs of doing that. On 30/03/15 16:55, Kevin Smith wrote: On 29 Mar 2015, at 02:36, Jefry Lagrange wrote:

Re: [Standards] wiki for xeps

On 28/03/15 23:16, Mathieu Pasquet wrote: On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 09:36:50PM -0400, Jefry Lagrange wrote: Hello everyone, I found myself thinking about the process of proposing and editing xeps that the xsf implements. I think there are some improvements that could be made in order to make

[Standards] wiki for xeps

make quick prototypes and get feedback. -- Jefry Lagrange

Re: [Standards] Proposal for Secure Distributed Discovery of JIDs

On 02/07/2013 06:49 AM, Winfried Tilanus wrote: On 02/07/2013 01:13 AM, Tobias Markmann wrote: Hi, This is highly experimental work, so nothing is set on stone yet. We would like to encourage everyone to send us their suggestions about how things should or shouldn't be done. I like the idea

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: File Information Sharing

On 11/28/2012 05:00 AM, Sergey Dobrov wrote: I still think that reusing of service discovery to discover shared files as it was in the XEP-135 is better. jabber:iq:search can be reused there too. Well, like I said, I've been trying to do this extension for a year now. In that time there hav

Re: [Standards] File sharing xep proposal

/09/2012 03:26 PM, Sergey Dobrov wrote: On 11/09/2012 03:17 AM, Matthew Wild wrote: On 8 November 2012 18:41, Sergey Dobrov wrote: On 11/09/2012 12:51 AM, Jefry Lagrange wrote: I have tried many different ways of making the protocol. The first time around, I modified xep0135 to include search

Re: [Standards] File sharing xep proposal

ll check the writing. Basically if you don't have or want to share any files you just reply with a: Thanks for your feedback. On 11/06/2012 08:19 AM, Jefry Lagrange wrote: Hello, I've been working for quite some time in a protocol extension to allow fil

Re: [Standards] File sharing xep proposal

6/2012 08:19 AM, Jefry Lagrange wrote: Hello, I've been working for quite some time in a protocol extension to allow file sharing. I have a (some-what) working prototype of its implementation. The prototype is available at Gajim's plugin repository: http://hg.gajim.org/gajim-plugins It

Re: [Standards] File sharing xep proposal

Hello Matthew, thanks for the feedback. On 11/05/2012 11:06 PM, Matthew Wild wrote: Hi Jefry, On 6 November 2012 01:19, Jefry Lagrange wrote: Hello, I've been working for quite some time in a protocol extension to allow file sharing. I have a (some-what) working prototype o

[Standards] File sharing xep proposal

P-0234 XEP-0059 XEP-0265 XEP-0135 fis Jefry Lagrange jefry.re...@gmail.com j.lagra...@jabber.org j.lagra...@gajim.org 0.0.1 2012-10-14 jl First draft XMPP extensions provide ways of transferring files between p

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0297 (Stanza Forwarding)

e problem stated in the introduction and > requirements? > 3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not, why not? > 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification? > 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written? > > Your feedback is appreciated! -- Jefry Lagrange

Re: [Standards] File hosting XEP?

t; client-specific way, but then others will not be able to implement the > same thing. > > > -- > With best regards, > Sergey Dobrov, > XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder. > -- Jefry Lagrange

Re: [Standards] [XEP-0234] File checking in JingleFT

imit). On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Waqas Hussain wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Jefry Lagrange wrote: >> So far what I've read in the XEP-0234 doesn't say anything about file >> checking. I suppose, "it is implied that once the comparing of the >>

[Standards] [XEP-0234] File checking in JingleFT

, because we only need to use this if we find that the file is corrupt, which is an unlikely event. I would love to know what you guys think of this. -- Jefry Lagrange

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0300 (Use of Cryptographic Hash Functions in XMPP)

;> >> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0300.html > > Folks, I started to look at XEP-0300 in relation to existing extensions. > Please review my work so far, and do your own thinking about how useful > (or not useful) XEP-0300 is. > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > -- Jefry Lagrange

Re: [Standards] Proposed changes to XEP-0135

ng is reused from XEP-122. A new extension for it would be small, and it wouldn't contain new information. Cheers, On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Matthew Wild wrote: > On 27 November 2011 03:50, Jefry Lagrange wrote: >> Hi, I been working on some changes to XEP-0135. >> &

[Standards] Proposed changes to XEP-0135

content MUST be that defined for POSIX extended regular expressions, including support for Unicode. The element MUST contain character data only (i.e., not contain any child elements) and MUST NOT possess any attributes. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated, I just want to know if I am on the right track here. -- Jefry Lagrange

Re: [Standards] XEP-198 when to start counting?

e specific > than "Re: Contents of Standards digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > >   1. XEP-198 when to start counting? (Jefry Lagrange) >   2. Re: XEP-198 when to start counting? (Matthew Wild) >   3. Re: XEP-198 when to start counting? (Peter Saint-Andre) >   4.

[Standards] XEP-198 when to start counting?

says that "The XMPP Registrar includes 'urn:xmpp:sm:3' in its registry of stream features at <http://xmpp.org/registrar/stream-features.html>." But at that URL you can't find 'urn:xmpp:sm:3', only 'urn:xmpp:sm:2' is there. -- Jefry Lagrange

[Standards] Resuming after or before binding?

nsions/xep-0198.html is not very explicit about it. Thanks. -- Jefry Lagrange -- Jefry Lagrange