Le lundi 16 octobre 2017, 13:46:02 CEST Dave Cridland a écrit :
> On 16 October 2017 at 12:04, Georg Lukas wrote:
> > * Dave Cridland [2017-10-15 11:06]:
> >> A Snippet is a small item of content. It is normally referenced within
> >> a chatroom or 1:1 chat. I'm only going to define use in MUC;
>
On 16 October 2017 at 12:04, Georg Lukas wrote:
> * Dave Cridland [2017-10-15 11:06]:
>> A Snippet is a small item of content. It is normally referenced within
>> a chatroom or 1:1 chat. I'm only going to define use in MUC;
>
> I'm curious what the benefits are compared to just sending whatever
>
On Montag, 16. Oktober 2017 13:04:14 CEST Georg Lukas wrote:
> > * Display inbound snippets. Since all content is a URI, web-based
> > clients SHOULD use a sandboxed iframe, so XHTML should be fine.
>
> Couldn't we just use a sandboxed iframe to render XHTML-IM?
That leads to horrible UX since yo
* Dave Cridland [2017-10-15 11:06]:
> A Snippet is a small item of content. It is normally referenced within
> a chatroom or 1:1 chat. I'm only going to define use in MUC;
I'm curious what the benefits are compared to just sending whatever
snippet you want inside of a message, or using http-uploa
On 16 Oct 2017, at 10:09, Dave Cridland wrote:
>
> On 16 October 2017 at 10:03, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> It’s certainly the path of least resistance for web clients. I’m somewhat
>> concerned that
>> a) “anything goes” means you can have essentially no reliable
>> interoperability - potentially e
On 16 October 2017 at 10:03, Kevin Smith wrote:
> It’s certainly the path of least resistance for web clients. I’m somewhat
> concerned that
> a) “anything goes” means you can have essentially no reliable
> interoperability - potentially even between the same client, if it happens to
> be runni
On 16 Oct 2017, at 09:58, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 15 October 2017 at 11:22, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> On 15 Oct 2017, at 10:03, Dave Cridland wrote:
>>> I'm just polling for interest; I said I'd write this up properly
>>> elsewhere, but is there interest in the following:
>> Yes
> Jolly good. I'll
On 15 October 2017 at 11:22, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 15 Oct 2017, at 10:03, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> I'm just polling for interest; I said I'd write this up properly
>> elsewhere, but is there interest in the following:
>
> Yes
>
Jolly good. I'll XEPerize this on various trains later.
>> A Snipp
On 15 Oct 2017, at 10:03, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I'm just polling for interest; I said I'd write this up properly
> elsewhere, but is there interest in the following:
Yes
> A Snippet is a small item of content. It is normally referenced within
> a chatroom or 1:1 chat. I'm only going to define u
I'm just polling for interest; I said I'd write this up properly
elsewhere, but is there interest in the following:
A Snippet is a small item of content. It is normally referenced within
a chatroom or 1:1 chat. I'm only going to define use in MUC;
The implementation consists of using two pubsub n
10 matches
Mail list logo
