On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
The release is built, but I have a couple of problems.
1) My ISP has gone flaky on me, and I haven't been able to upload it to
minotaur. They claim the problems should be fixed tomorrow, so hopefully
I'll be able to upload it then.
The release is
The first thing I noticed is that struts-el is missing from the
download. I used the one I had from a nightly build in December and it
didn't seem to cause conflicts.
I tried 1.2.0 in AppFuse and all tests pass! Nice work gents. I didn't
even have to modify any files - my last Struts update
I notice that the most recent version of your splendid two-fields
validator (looking in CVS at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/struts/appfuse/src/web/
org/appfuse/webapp/util/ValidationUtil.java) still has the ActionErrors
class in it's method signature:
boolean
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27204.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27228.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks for fixing that. But there is still a problem.
(Nightly Build 2004/02/25)
You can see the error in the struts-example web application.
There is a staticJavascript.jsp page with this content
%@ page language=java %
%-- set document type to Javascript (addresses a bug in Netscape
according
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Matt Raible wrote:
The first thing I noticed is that struts-el is missing from the
download. I used the one I had from a nightly build in December and it
didn't seem to cause conflicts.
Fooey. I don't know why that would have happened. I'll take a look when I
get home
At 7:23 PM +0100 2/25/04, Ralph Schaer wrote:
Thanks for fixing that. But there is still a problem.
(Nightly Build 2004/02/25)
You can see the error in the struts-example web application.
Hm. I don't believe that that's been changed in any of the last few revisions.
Please file this in Bugzilla;
this bug was introduced with revision 1.45 from 2004/02/04
in JavascriptValidatorTag.java
you find the working code in revision 1.44.
method renderJavascript.
StringBuffer results = new StringBuffer();
ModuleConfig config =
TagUtils.getInstance().getModuleConfig(pageContext);
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27235.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Good to hear... Now you can join the new age debate of not Windoze
versus Linux but rather what flavor of Linux?!
Haiku Hint:
Gentoo rule supreme.
Suse should be a girls name.
Red Hat is for Fools.
/me likes pointless debates
-Tim
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
From: Tim Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Haiku Hint:
Gentoo rule supreme.
Suse should be a girls name.
Red Hat is for Fools.
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?StrutsHaiku
-Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I almost didn't read this thread, based on the subject line, but I'm
rather glad that I did, given how far the subject has strayed...
There is still a need for a freeze after tagging. While it's not quite as
essential as with our previous release process, it's still important.
Here's why.
The
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27235.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
At 9:08 PM +0100 2/25/04, Ralph Schaer wrote:
this bug was introduced with revision 1.45 from 2004/02/04
in JavascriptValidatorTag.java
OK; that makes sense. But that was when I was trying to get it to
throw an exception when there was no such form instead of just
spewing the static javascript
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27236.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
So, at least as long as folks are happy with me as the RM, please allow me
the leeway of a short freeze period between tagging and releasing the
build, so that I can do the job as best I can. I don't think that should
be too onerous.
Fair enough: being RM is a lot of work, I'm sure, and we should
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27235.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27236.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Regarding the comment I made for the bug below, is there any authority
required to set a bug as invalid or is it open for anyone to do so (with
a good reason of course :) )
Just wondering for the future...
Thanks,
Richard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27239.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
It's on a project by project basis, and asking as your doing now
is the best way to know. I usually respect the wishes of the
committers that are currently doing the heavy lifting, and that
changes over time. Currently, some are for and some against.
A while back a user was trying to be helpful
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27239.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've just finished uploading a new build that includes Struts-EL. (And
none too soon, given the huge thunderstorm going on here right now...)
It's in the same location as before, listed below.
Again, I'd appreciate it if someone could verify the integrity of the
files, and let me know if they're
26 matches
Mail list logo
