On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, David Graham wrote:
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:59:28 -0700
> From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
>
> I do
L PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:46:24 -0800
"Mark Abbott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is it usual in Struts for a release candidate to come
> out with the final depend
"Mark Abbott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is it usual in Struts for a release candidate to come
> out with the final dependency versions for community testing,
> or will these be put in place for the final release only?
There isn't a "usual" way. ;-) With the Str
Yes, but let me ask that another way then. Are Struts
final releases newly built for that purpose, or do they
consist of the last release candidate that has been
through community testing and then is relabeled as
the final release when everyone is satisfied with it?
Mark
At 09:13 AM 2/28/2
CTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:51:22 -0800
Is it usual in Struts for a release candidate to come
out with the final dependency versions for community testing,
or will these be put i
Is it usual in Struts for a release candidate to come
out with the final dependency versions for community testing,
or will these be put in place for the final release only?
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
I've removed Commons Resources from the build, and also from the Gump
descriptor, and updated the docs so that they no longer refer to this
component. Struts no longer has any Commons Sandbox dependencies. :-)
--
Martin Cooper
"Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROT
2003 09:59:43 -0800 (PST)
> From: Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
>
> As the topic comes up regularly, it strikes me that we haven't h
Yes. Since announcing the Beta, there has been an uptick in user activity,
so there are a number of bugs that need to be addressed. Unfortunately,
FileUpload seems to be a one man show (me) at the moment, with the
original
contributors being conspicuously absent.
It looks like there are 2 outstand
Martin Cooper wrote:
"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As the topic comes up regularly, it strikes me that we haven't had any
formal discussions or decisions on what versions of our dependent packages
to include in Struts 1.1 final. Most of them are
"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As the topic comes up regularly, it strikes me that we haven't had any
> formal discussions or decisions on what versions of our dependent packages
> to include in Struts 1.1 final. Most of them are probably
> non
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
>
>
> No. Jakarta ORO is a text processing package that Validator
> uses
sage
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that the just released commons-net 1.0 has taken over from
jakarta-oro.
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Dependent Packages in
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
> >Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:17
I think that the just released commons-net 1.0 has taken over from
jakarta-oro.
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
>
t use nested so I have no vested interest in whether
it's fixed in 1.1 or 1.2.
David
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Depende
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, David Graham wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:09:10 -0700
> From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
>
> So dbcp
en in Tomcat 4.1.18
if we don't include the fix.
David
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:59:43 -0800
As the topic comes up regularly, it strikes me that we haven't had any
formal discussions or decisions on what versions of our dependent packages
to include in Struts 1.1 final. Most of them are probably
non-controversial, but there are a couple of interesting cases. Let's
talk about the whole li
19 matches
Mail list logo
