exec = sugar-activity tuxmath-activity
Once this correction done, the activity works normally !
I don't believe you :P
The correct exec line is
exec = sugar-activity activity.TuxmathStart
You must believe me !
Try to do this:
1) Install official 12.1.0 on an XO-1 or XO-1.5
2) Download
I think we have some confusion with the versions of this.
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/ImageViewer/
Looking here I see recent releases in their 20s and in their 50s,
which one is which?
Peter
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Sugar Labs Activities
Hi I want to know the status of a RaspberryPi distribution like Raspbian
which can handle Sugar's environment. Something like Sugar on a Pi.
I could find this testing reports talking about Sweets
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Testing/Reports/Sweets_on_Raspberry_pi_armhf_raspbian
The reports seems
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
Hi I want to know the status of a RaspberryPi distribution like Raspbian
which can handle Sugar's environment. Something like Sugar on a Pi.
I could find this testing reports talking about Sweets
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
Hi I want to know the status of a RaspberryPi distribution like Raspbian
which can handle Sugar's environment. Something like Sugar on a Pi.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
Hi I want to know the status of a RaspberryPi distribution like
Hi all,
I am trying to build os for XO-1.75. I have installed fedora 14 as main OS
and installed fedora for ARM (Fedora 12) under virtual
machine. Everything including network is working from within virtual OS and
I can ping outer world as well.
I now need to install essential packages to run
On 03/27/2013 09:03 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 27 March 2013 16:23, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
I know all this can be replaced by a fork pull workflow, and I'm
used to do that in github. But gitorius interface is not as good as
github, in my opinion. By the way, if we have
On 03/28/2013 10:51 AM, Basanta Shrestha wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to build os for XO-1.75. I have installed fedora 14 as main OS
and installed fedora for ARM (Fedora 12) under virtual
machine. Everything including network is working from within virtual OS and
I can ping outer world as well.
On 03/27/2013 11:03 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Another option is use http://dev.laptop.org/~gonzalo/nicaragua/Tuxmath-3.xo
and tuxmath packaged in fedora.
Gonzalo
Ok, the AND is important here. Would be good to write down the clear
steps to get this into a build.
The no-sound option on the
[root@fedora-arm ~]# ping google.com
PING google.com (74.125.135.100) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from ni-in-f100.1e100.net (74.125.135.100): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47
time=142 ms
[root@fedora-arm ~]# yum update
Setting up Update Process
No Packages marked for Update
[root@fedora-arm ~]# yum install
On 03/27/2013 10:57 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
I have created a page in the wiki to describe the status of JournalShare
activity.
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/JournalShare
Enjoy Easter
Gonzalo
Thanks Gonzalo for the write-up!
The first thing that caught my eye was the way to
On 28 March 2013 10:52, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
I read a bit about the differences. For a purist the 'is not using free
software on their server' springs to mind. But maybe let's focus on the work
flow first.
Though are there any relevant web apps which are free software?
Hello,
we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in
the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here.
IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the
discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the
scope of the release as much as
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in
the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here.
IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the
discussion about
On 03/28/2013 02:11 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Hi I want to know the status of a RaspberryPi distribution like
Raspbian which can handle Sugar's environment. Something like Sugar on
a Pi.
I could find this testing reports talking about Sweets
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
Hi I want to know the status of a RaspberryPi distribution like
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 March 2013 10:52, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
I read a bit about the differences. For a purist the 'is not using free
software on their server' springs to mind. But maybe let's focus on the work
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Some initial comments on 0001
I've renamed this thread to be specific to 0001, which is adding a
comments field to the journal expanded entry.
Thanks for the review.
* Did you post screenshots of this so that we can
Hi,
would you mind to submit these as a pull request of
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar
As discussed in another thread I would like to give github workflow a
try. I will of course push the changes back to the official repo then.
On 28 March 2013 14:26, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
would you mind to submit these as a pull request of
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar
As discussed in another thread I would like to give github workflow a
try. I will of course push the changes back to the
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
would you mind to submit these as a pull request of
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar
As discussed in another thread I would like
A couple of problems on github (I may be doing things wrong):
1. No pull request shows up on my dashboard even though I seeming
successfully submitted one. How do I confirm it was received?
2. It is generated, because when I try to submit a second pull request
from the same fork for a different
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple of problems on github (I may be doing things wrong):
1. No pull request shows up on my dashboard even though I seeming
successfully submitted one. How do I confirm it was received?
Never mind. I was
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway I think a github workflow would cover three important things
we care about
* Patches are visible to anyone.
* Patches are trackable.
* Integration with issues tracking.
Of course it migth introduce other
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in
the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here.
IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the
discussion about
I have not tried to push multiple requests myself yet so I can't be of much
help. Quick googling seems to indicate that selecting specific commits
might be possible but complicated... It think using one branch per patchset
would be good practice anyway.
On Thursday, 28 March 2013, Walter Bender
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not tried to push multiple requests myself yet so I can't be of much
help. Quick googling seems to indicate that selecting specific commits might
be possible but complicated... It think using one branch per
I would expect the same workflow to be possible in GitHub.
But let's play a bit with it and see if we like it before making too many
plans about a switch :)
On Thursday, 28 March 2013, Chris Leonard wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
On 28 March 2013 16:27, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
- webservices
- comment field in journal detail view
We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities
for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another way to
expand its
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Good. About the tooltips, I was not sure about the scales denomination. In
some places, the scales with letters is named German and in other is
American ! The scale starting in DO can be named Latin, but is not
2013/3/28 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
I would expect the same workflow to be possible in GitHub.
But let's play a bit with it and see if we like it before making too many
plans about a switch :)
Just some things which come to my mind:
* Will bugs.sugarlabs.org make sense having the
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
On 28 March 2013 16:27, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com
wrote:
- webservices
- comment field in journal detail view
We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities
for
Belated reminder that we (the Sugar Labs oversight board) are meeting
at 6PM (22UTC) on irc.freenode.net #sugar
Please join us.
regards.
-walter
--
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 March 2013 16:27, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
- webservices
- comment field in journal detail view
We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities
for
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
want to start on that kind of analysis? :)
James' self analysis is spot on.
We all wear several 'hats' Sugar contributor, Employee or volunteer,
person, . These hats bring bias which affect our decision
Don't have sense that works if you patch after install and not if already
patched.
The log says anything? and the shell.log?
I know it dont have sense. Its why Ive already spent hours on this
problem
Ive worked again on it today. Here some other information:
As I said, the
On 28 March 2013 22:12, lio...@olpc-france.org wrote:
4) Launch the app, it don’t work: the error is pretty the same:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/sugar-activity, line 154, in module
main()
File /usr/bin/sugar-activity, line 110, in main
class_name =
Hey Daniel!
On 28 March 2013 17:53, S. Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Just some things which come to my mind:
* Will bugs.sugarlabs.org make sense having the github bug tracker?
Integration between git and the bug tracker would be pretty awesome
(being able to close bugs by just
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Daniel!
On 28 March 2013 17:53, S. Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Just some things which come to my mind:
* Will bugs.sugarlabs.org make sense having the github bug tracker?
Integration between git
I have my feature :)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change
PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember?
2013/3/28 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
we already had a bit of discussion on
I don't have an explanation for the installation thing, but that error is
caused by your exec line which is incorrect. sugar-activity expects the
path to a class as
first argument, not the name of a script.
Okay. I've changed the activity.info following your advice.
Now the patched version
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez nachoe...@gmail.com wrote:
I have my feature :)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change
PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember?
OK. Can you point me to the code in git?
-walter
2013/3/28 Martin Abente
Walter, you have the *.zip in your mail :P (Remember?)
2013/3/28 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez nachoe...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have my feature :)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change
PD: Walter I need the *.patch
On 28 March 2013 23:21, Lionel Laské lionel.la...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have an explanation for the installation thing, but that error is
caused by your exec line which is incorrect. sugar-activity expects the
path to a class as
first argument, not the name of a script.
Okay. I've changed
Hi,
I started experimenting a bit with github code reviews, with Walter as
ginuea pig :) We wasn't too sure about stuff like rebasing, using
separate branches etc, so tonight I played a bit myself with creating
pull requests.
Something like the following might be a decent start for a workflow
1
On 29 March 2013 00:03, lio...@olpc-france.org wrote:
It means TUXMATH_SCRIPT is unset. As I said the tuxmath-activity script
does more than running sugar-activity, including setting TUXMATH_SCRIPT.
Yes but I've tried to force the value with no more success. The
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
I have ongoing work on polishing the Language section of the Sugar
settings panel. I'm sharing my findings to open discussion, to start
bringing back discussions to the mailing list, and to encourage
testing of my
48 matches
Mail list logo
