On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 09:52:21PM +0100, Roger Hayter wrote:
How would you distinguish messages you don't want very much (like
possibly non-existent Frost messages) from ones you do want a lot? It
is likely to generate quite a lot of extra traffic to automatically
retry all RNFs till you
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:58:03PM +0100, Hibbs, Phil wrote:
I was a little amused to discover that the Windows installer requires me to
click I Agree to the GPL screen, despite the GPL stating specifically that
5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed
it.
Perfectly normal. It should perhaps happen less than it does, but
freenet is still under development.
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 04:11:12PM -0700, GumpyGal wrote:
i really can't give much more detail, it happen
sporadically when I'm browsing freenet. sometimes it
will give me the Couldn't
Yup. 60083 is a bit broken. It was an experiment. Upgrade to 60085+!
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:12:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not seen any message relating to the 60083 build at the, so I thought that I
should report this, although I cannot imagine that the devs did not notice
Freenet stable build 5078 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. All stable branch users should upgrade ASAP.
Changelog:
* Make 5077 mandatory. This is a fairly significant change. 5077 made
huge changes, including some fundamental changes to how freenet
routes (bidirectional
Usually this is caused by the hardware routers/etc not being able to
support enough connections. You could try decreasing maxNodeConnections
(the default is now 200, but if you have an old config file it might be
forced to 512; you could try 100).
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 08:30:34PM -0700, Galen
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:12:39PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
On 27-Apr-2004 Toad wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:11:17PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Just noticed after I had uploaded the log rotate script that the date
command
was being used in two locations. Stoopid.
Uhm
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:16:41AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In einer eMail vom Di, 27. Apr. 2004 13:03 MEZ schreibt Niklas Bergh [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:
Does it increase _only_ when you insert or will it increase no matter
what?
I think it increases also if I do not insert at all, but
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:30:29PM +0200, Marc wrote:
Hi,
when I try to view http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/routing.html
(the routing summary), I get nothing back. But in freenet.log I find the
following:
D'oh. Will be fixed in 5078.
25.04.2004 15:46:34
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 01:57:41PM +0200, Rama Jagerman wrote:
Hi,
First of all, congratulations with the new stable version of Freenet.
At this moment I am almost sure that there is a bug in Freenet, please
see the next line, that I copied from Performance -- General
Information:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:28:06PM +1200, John Huttley wrote:
Toad wrote:
{many nice things}
Thank you toad, a job well done!
Could you please cast your eye to the http interface.
What happens -- Has happend for ages.-- is that after a minimal amount
of activity.
OR a modest amount
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:02:47AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Friday 23 April 2004 00:45, Galen wrote:
Hi Freenet People,
I'd like to hear about your experience with and uses for freenet. I'm
interested in those that use freenet. How usable is it? What is your
setup? What kind of
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:16:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In einer eMail vom Fr, 23. Apr. 2004 5:45 MEZ schreibt Galen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Freenet People,
I'd like to hear about your experience with and uses for freenet. I'm
interested in those that use freenet. How usable is
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:15:16AM +, MonkeyOmen wrote:
Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm.. That ought to do it.. If you spawn a standard apache on the linux
machine, can your 10.* machines access pages from it successfully?
Yes.
If not, then I think this is a TCP/IP
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:05:43AM +, Psikic wrote:
Nicholas Sturm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is an interesting comment. Could this really be why we are getting
little response in last few months?
I haven't used freenet for a few months... I just downloaded the latest
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 07:54:38PM -0400, Nikita Proskourine wrote:
Here is some selective filtering of my freenet.log for errors. I am
running FreeNet on WinXP with the bundled JRE (installed from scratch).
A few minutes after I started my node:
Apr 9, 2004 7:03:17 PM
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:11:37PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I fired up Ethereal and let it capture for a few minutes, then looked for a
SYN packet. The first 0xc0 bytes of the conversation have what appear to be
easily recognizable bytes: 00 01 09 04 00 00, and a string of zeros later.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:20:41AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Tuesday 27 April 2004 10:53, Toad wrote:
I assume you are using the stable branch? What build? Have you upgraded
to 5077? And please show me the top few lines from
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 06:08:50PM +0200, Rudolf Krist wrote:
Toad schrieb:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:30:29PM +0200, Marc wrote:
Hi,
when I try to view http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/routing.html
(the routing summary), I get nothing back. But in freenet.log I find
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 05:19:11PM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote:
It is a known issue.. best workaround would probably be to remove the key
from the RSL:s maintenance-queue before actually closing it..
The workaround is easier than that. Just take getBuf() returning null to
mean the same as
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:11:17PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Just noticed after I had uploaded the log rotate script that the date command
was being used in two locations. Stoopid.
Uhm, what exactly is this supposed to do? If you are not using
logRotate=true in the config file, then the
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 11:05:14PM -0700, Galen wrote:
Hi,
One of the places where I would like to use freenet is behind NAT. I
know all about port mapping, but this simply isn't available in this
situation.
What is the hope of running Freenet?
I know virtually every other protocol
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:07:15PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:41:56 -0700, Galen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella,
fasttrack, etc. Uploading doesn't always work really great, but
downloading is quite
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:07:49PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
No, they haven't. Please try running a web server behind a NAT that
you
can't forward ports on. Or ssh. Or any number of other client/server
protocols.
I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella,
Stable build 5077 is now available. The snapshots have been updated.
All users of the stable branch should upgrade ASAP. This build has far
too many changes to list exhaustively (but I tried, you can see the
results in the commit comments). Some highlights:
* Fixed a HUGE bug which was preventing
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:25:18PM +, zaphodbond wrote:
The dated files containing updated snapshots on
http://www.freenetproject.org/snapshots/
all seem to contain the out-of-date build 60043
from the 3rd of april.
The files are identical.
2,709,234 freenet-unstable-20040416.tgz
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:05:49AM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 15 April 2004 04:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, whenever I point a browser to http://127.0.0.1:/ the
browser continuously tries to return something but
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:33:41AM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
Pierre Abbat wrote:
What happens to requests for information stored on my node if it goes
offline for several hours and then comes back? What happens if the IP
address changes?
Node downtime will affect the estimates for
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 02:27:22AM +0200, sdretu wrote:
Hello !
I just installed freenet.
I used the debian stable archive of freenet-unstable.ps aux
Now I jump to the interface, browse http://localhost:/ and try to download
gpl.txt.
What build number does it say? Most likely your
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:28:06AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I told Freenet to rotate logs, but instead it writes an apparently unending
string of logfiles. How do I tell it the number of logfiles to keep?
Freenet doesn't really support log rotation in the sense that at present
it does not
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 02:27:05AM -0600, S wrote:
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:33:41 -0800
Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
contrary to everything in freenet's documentation, I have better luck
retrieving with a freshly started/reseeded node than one that has been
running for a while. [...]
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:58:45PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Thanks for the response anyway. :-) And don't feel bad about your ignorance
in certain areas. Most of us are still learning as we go here. :-)
Including me! There's plenty of parts of the code that I'm not familiar
with, and I
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 06:15:17AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 00:40, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
I've been getting good results with the following:
maxNodeConnections=128
maximumThreads=128
rtMaxNodes=256
targetMaxThreads=128
tfAbsoluteMaxThreads=128
The load
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 06:15:17AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 00:40, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
I've been getting good results with the following:
maxNodeConnections=128
maximumThreads=128
rtMaxNodes=256
targetMaxThreads=128
tfAbsoluteMaxThreads=128
You might
:
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 12:28, Toad wrote:
What are the messageSendTime's like? I suppose you won't know if the web
interface hasn't come up... What's the last thing in the logfile?
The web interface comes up but is very slow. I turned the node off, as it was
just hiking the load average
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 03:23:14PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 14:17, Toad wrote:
You could try doCPULoad=true, but you'd have to turn off the background
CPU hog. That makes the node tell other nodes to send it fewer queries
until its CPU usage is reasonable
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 07:44:11PM +, Michal Charemza wrote:
Hi, I'm a bit of a newbie, so I'm not 100% sure that my answer is right,
but I think I can help:
I know. Perhaps I should clarify: it begins to download as soon as I run
start-freenet.sh,
As soon as you start freenet your
Wrong. It's quite possible to interface to freenet on the FNP level.
Have a look at freenet/client/FNPClient.java .
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:56:30PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:15:57 +1100, Craig Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Freenet,
:)
potentially
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:38:06PM +0100, Michael Stather wrote:
Hi,
using the newest version, when letting the client run for about 5 minutes to
connect and then opening an index page from the gateway page, the page
loads immediately but the pictures aren?t displayed. One or two from the
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 04:11:31PM -0500, Brad Gilbert wrote:
I had to reinstall Freenet from scratch after an OS crash. It had been
running fine. Now I can't, for the life of me, get it passed my router.
The virtual server setting in the router still had the previous
listenPort so I just
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:09:27AM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Using 5076 (stable) on dialup I actually retrieve a couple of files, first in
several weeks. Still have only outgoing connections after about 30 minutes, but log
looks much less confusing than most recent ones. 5074 actually
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 10:24:08PM +0100, Michael Stather wrote:
Hi,
I encountered 2 main poroblems trying to use freenet:
1. I?ve a router, and whatever I inser in the ipadress field of the
config, I get
There was an error determining this node's physical address(es).
Please make
Freenet stable build 5076 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. You can get the build via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD,
or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows,
or get the jar from
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:24:17PM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
I have two freenodes running on separate networks (some stuff works, and
other stuff doesn't on one, and vice versa for the other)
How can I manually reference the nodes to each other? (Hopefully this
will allow the
Perfectly normal. The node does not support changing the store size on
the fly. It will be changed at the next startup.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 08:46:34AM +0100, Thorsten Guenther wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
It's build 5074.
Any more info needed?
Thank you
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:42:36AM +, Michal Charemza wrote:
Hi, I have two questions:
1. All the sites I've viewed on freenet, don't have a full doctype tag,
they either have none, or just
!DOCTYPE, instead of
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC blah blah
The test site I inserted into my
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:42:34PM +, Michal Charemza wrote:
Paul Derbyshire wrote:
What about inline images?
If tested this on a test freesite, and the scr for an inline image on
the WWW gets changed to
/__CHECKED_HTTP__www.urlofimage.com/directory/image.gif
On 15 Mar 2004 at
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:16:00AM -0800, Joe Blow wrote:
I've just discovered that my DSL connection gets a new
IP address on the order of every couple of minutes.
Yikes!
I
don't know if it's because of my pppoe setup or
because of SBC, but I think that is what has been
causing my freenet
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 04:50:15PM -, Dave wrote:
A lot of the problem actually is due to users running nodes with old
config files generated by the windows configurator, which forces all
settings (doesn't write %'s), so they run with old settings such as 50
node routing tables, which
Should be fixed in 60007. Please try it and report if the bug still
happens.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:17:04PM +0100, Rudolf Krist wrote:
Starting of an unstable node failed (reseeding)
Details
I have got 2 computers in a small network. On one pc I already run a
unstable node for a long
as a RNF. (RFC1122
Robustness principle). Toad told me that he had fixed that but most
likely he hasn't...
I also get quite some of these:
java.io.IOException: Premature end of stream
at fiw.fcp.FCPMessage.readMessage(FCPMessage.java:34)
at fiw.fcp.FCPConn.insertStream
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:09:09PM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Please provide reference to a good glossary.
I tried it (in a sandbox Linux account, which is absoltely the minimum
precaution anyone should take if running code downloaded from an
untrusted anonymous source) and it seems to
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:13:58PM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Toad wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:46:55 +
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christopher Brian Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] This error
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:11:25PM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
There _has_ to be a question when installing asking the
user if he/she pays for bandwidth (esp outgoing) and set the configuration in
Freenet accordingly - bad press resulting from Joe Doe installing Freenet and
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:59:46AM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Would you possibly agree with this, There is no known way to meaningfully
evaluate the performance of freenet?
No. There are several ways to evaluate it. My favourite is push/pull
tests. Insert a file on one node, and fetch it
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 11:26:18PM -0500, Keith Botelho wrote:
you could get the latest build which is 6281.
Uhmm, no, the latest build is 60,003 :)
- Original Message -
From: Martin Stone Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:51 PM
Unfortunately crawling freenet via HTTP will have the main effect of
DoSing your freenet node, because every web download takes up a thread,
and we therefore limit parallel HTTP downloads to 24-36. Ideally you'd
want a real FCP spider; there must be one out there somewhere.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:49:46PM +0100, Krist van Besien wrote:
Hello,
As on my system my node reliably goes haywire after about 6 to eight
hours I need to restart it periodically. I'm just wondering what the
effect is on how well my node is integrated in the network.
What happens
downloading files all the time. For example I downloaded two 14GB
files that were inserted months ago successfully and very fastjust in
a couple
of hours. Most of the free-sites are accesible. Unstable works better
than
stable though. But yup freenet is evolving and growing. Cheers to Toad
I'd guess it was a problem with the OS, or the JVM. You can however work
around it by setting ipAddress=my ip address and ipDetectorInterval=0
in the config file (remove any preceding %'s or #'s first), and of
course restarting the node.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0800, Christopher Brian
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:04:29AM +, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:37:34PM -0800, Galen wrote:
Hi,
I think I have a relatively decent idea of how freenet works. And if I
had a nice broadband connection I could dedicate to freenet, I'd be
delighted and I don't think I'd
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 06:36:09PM +0200, notmyrealemail wrote:
Hello,
Build 5073 seems to connect very poorly and the log is filled with
this kind of messages :
16:25:39 RouteNotFound Fetching (running)
freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED],Zt29QUMcl6ozbq4MqdSOhQ as
freenet.exe for
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Joe Blow wrote:
I do have a NAT box, but the listen port is forwarded.
And, my pants are pulled down on the box I'm running
freenet on (everything set to ACCEPT). Besides I when
I plugged the cable modem into the freenet box
(bypassing the NAT
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:37:34PM -0800, Galen wrote:
Hi,
I think I have a relatively decent idea of how freenet works. And if I
had a nice broadband connection I could dedicate to freenet, I'd be
delighted and I don't think I'd have problems. But for now, my results
with freenet have
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:54:59AM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
will running the freenet node over extended periods of time increase the
reliability of the cached seed nodes. I seem to be in a very unstable
part of the network and I can only seem to get like a 1% success rate on
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:35:41PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:01:29 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running build 5063; anybody have any idea why my node is rejecting all
incoming requests?
Current estimated load 100% [QueryRejecting all incoming
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 11:34:07PM +0100, no_dammagE wrote:
Hi, support team!
First of all, I would like to thank the whole freenet team for developing Fred. I
wish you good luck in the further development :)
Now to the problem:
I have two computers - one with WinXP (old, needs a
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:19:21PM +0100, Ruben Garcia wrote:
In connection with what Ian said about the hierarchy of classes of
freenet nodes (those in seednodes.ref
and the ones in these nodes routing tables, etc)
I think seednodes.ref should not be overwritten unless there is a
network
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 04:02:35AM -0800, miguel wrote:
duh, guys, I'm a newbie +- so I can only make observations so here:
(note: order does not indicate weight nor priority)
1. Get a female to work on this thing.
2. At least run permanent node.
3. DSL ain't no faster when it hits the
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:37:34 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. The last 3 or 4+ builds have gotten slower and dumber.
Why thank you for that informative, empirically backed and helpful bug
report.
My experience
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
Toad writes:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have been really good already ..
They have? In what sense? All I
You don't get lots of RNFs?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
Toad writes:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have been really good already
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:31:37AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
Toad writes:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
With the the latest stable builds, my java hanging problems have gone
away (I figure that they were in an infinite loop trying to garbage
collect due
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 03:41:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 13:32, Toad wrote:
The routing table will not be overwritten unless either:
a) The seednodes.ref is more recent than the routing table OR
b) The routing table is trashed, for example because all
downloading files all the time. For example I downloaded two 14GB
files that were inserted months ago successfully and very fastjust in a couple
of hours. Most of the free-sites are accesible. Unstable works better than
stable though. But yup freenet is evolving and growing. Cheers to Toad, Ian
the time. For example I downloaded two 14GB
files that were inserted months ago successfully and very fastjust in a couple
Uhm, do you mean 14MB?
of hours. Most of the free-sites are accesible. Unstable works better than
stable though. But yup freenet is evolving and growing. Cheers to Toad
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:28:36PM -0500, vinyl1 wrote:
OK, I have the latest build (5074), the latest seed nodes, the latest
everything I could find as of today, 3/8/2004
On the Web interface, I can't load The Freedom Engine, Dolphin's Free Index,
and Content of Evil. I can load the
A lot of the problem actually is due to users running nodes with old
config files generated by the windows configurator, which forces all
settings (doesn't write %'s), so they run with old settings such as 50
node routing tables, which mean that the unix nodes run a lot better
than the windows
Curious. What build are you running?
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:29:58PM +0100, Krist van Besien wrote:
Hello all,
I used freenet a while a go. Until moving meant no broadband connection
for a while. I now have broadband again, and a machine I can leave on
all the time. So I looked into
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:31:05PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:22:31 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes (try 1), HTL=25
[2004-03-08 22:15:17] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in
insert
thread
Firewall?
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:18:27AM -0800, Joe Blow wrote:
Two systems:
1) Very fast linux box running suse 9.0 DSL connection 1.2Mbit.
2) Slower laptop running WinXP Cable modem 1.0Mbit.
I set up freenet 5074 on my linux box a few days ago. I have over 2.4Gb in my
store, but
Freenet stable build 5074 is now available. The snapshots will have been
updated sometime in the next few hours. Once that has happened, you can get
build 5074 via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the
freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get
the jar from
Some people on support were having problems with unstable. If you run
unstable you should read tech or devl and upgrade daily or so.
- Forwarded message from Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [Tech] Unstable build
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 05:34:21PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:15:27 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
be distributed more widely. Specifically, if the requestor cancels a
transfer, we should still transfer the data. Of course this means that
nodes can DoS
Freenet stable build 5073 is now available. The snapshots are being
updated. You can get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X,
or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get
the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar .
All stable
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:36:01PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
Hi all,
I think some will find this interesting.
I've run Freenet on a Duron 900 with 512Mb ram, Windows 2000, for quite
some time. The javaw process has consumed all available CPU, and the
computer has been quite
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:36:52PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:42:48 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Memory usage on both?
Roughly the same at ~150Mb (javaw process)
Knock down the xferrate a bit from 11kb/s, it dropped a while after I sent
that mess (I
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 05:36:44PM +0100, Yoann wrote:
I try to compile the lastest Freenet sources.
I take the library freenet-ext.jar and junit.jar
And when i do make, I have (I had -depecation) :
javac -target 1.1 -classpath lib/freenet-ext.jar:lib/junit.jar
-sourcepath src -d build
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:10:11AM -0800, Sheldon Young wrote:
javac -target 1.1 -classpath lib/freenet-ext.jar:lib/junit.jar
-sourcepath src -d build -deprecation src/freenet/client/*.java
src/freenet/client/cli/*.java
src/freenet/support/servlet/http/HttpSessionImpl.java:7: warning:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:19:28PM +0100, Alban Bedel wrote:
Hi Toad,
on Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:37:46 + you wrote:
Before i start i must say i always like the idea of freenet. I tried
it a couple time long ago but i never had enouth disk space to devote.
I tried the current stable
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 06:56:42AM -0600, S wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:33:42 +0100
Maximilian Mehnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet is one of the most beautiful ideas I ever hit on.
But it should be possible to run it on a small pentium machine with no
more than 100MB of RAM.
I
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:13:05AM +0100, Maximilian Mehnert wrote:
Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Maximilian Mehnert um 15:28:
Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of whack.
In fact that sounds insane. Which threadFactory is your configuration
file set to use?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:28:27PM +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
On 29/01/2004, at 10:13 PM, Maximilian Mehnert wrote:
Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Maximilian Mehnert um 15:28:
Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of
whack.
In fact that sounds insane. Which
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:21:13PM +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
And how many browsers do that? Sure, I'm not sure about writing a
plugin, since most of the time they can only add processing for
different MIME types, whereas a different browser using a freenet://
protocol could connect
Please read my other mail on this subject before passing judgement -
what I am working on at the moment may actually have some bearing on
this.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:15:22AM +, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:19:28PM +0100, Alban Bedel wrote:
Hi Toad,
on Mon, 16 Feb 2004
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 02:04:45AM -, Kevin Bennett wrote:
Came home tonight to find that my node had crashed earlier on. Now after
restarting I'm seeing millions (literally) of this message in the logfile:
This definitely should not happen, it means your node is using the
pre-multiplexing
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 09:00:36PM +, Jim Dixon wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
Freeing up RAM is not related to routing table at all. Unfortunately,
Freenet code contains a bug (a so called memory leak) which takes
memory from your OS, but then forgets about it,
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:37:16PM +, Jim Dixon wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Niklas Bergh wrote:
It is noticeable that Freenet uses a ridiculous amount of RAM. If I run
top on a node that connects to only one other node, and sporadically at
that, I see that it is using 79 MB of
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 09:34:06AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote:
Is it a VM bug or is it just creating
objects it theoretically could reach (thus they don't get GC'd), but
ignores forever?
The second it what is defined as a 'memory leak' in GC'd environments.
Or a space leak.
/N
--
Freenet stable build 5069 is now available. The snapshots will have been
updated sometime in the next few minutes; if you don't get 5069, try
again in an hour's time. If it's still 5068, complain to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] You can get it via the update.sh script on
Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the
501 - 600 of 706 matches
Mail list logo
