Hi everyone,I have a pretty basic VLAN question that I haven't been able to find the answer to: Can pfSense do VLAN trunking? More specifically: I'm installing a Metro Ethernet connection with pfSense boxes on each end. I need to tag all traffic sent over the Metro Ethernet connection with a
I could be wrong, but don't think I am...You need a switch (802.1Q) in
between the pfsense boxen.
On 11/8/06, Nathan Osborne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a pretty basic VLAN question that I haven't been able to find the
answer to: Can pfSense do VLAN trunking? More
Hi,
As the recent discussion in the forum shows, there is interest in a new traffic
shaper.
From the discussion I can see that everybody wants something different from
the traffic shaper. :-)
Wishes include:
- transparent traffic shaping
- QOS
- shaping on all interfaces
- shaping traffic
What are you talking about? We are merely raising money for a
transparent bridge shaper. Please cut this FUD out.
Scott
On 11/8/06, Christian Krützfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As the recent discussion in the forum shows, there is interest in a new traffic
shaper.
From the
I haven't yet chimed in too much on this thread. When I do, I'll
probably close the thread and start a new one that I can update the
first message in with what I'm planning on doing and what's impossible
and who has made pledges against the bounty.
For the record, the bounty was started for
pfSense does do 802.1q trunking so if they
device you are connecting does (should be most except some older switches) you
shouldnt have a problem.
Thanks
John
From: Nathan Osborne
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006
9:19 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
On 11/8/06, Nathan Osborne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a pretty basic VLAN question that I haven't been able to find the
answer to: Can pfSense do VLAN trunking? More specifically: I'm
installing a Metro Ethernet connection with pfSense boxes on each end. I
need to tag all
Should work - I've been playing with vlans and got it all working.
The only weirdness I have left to solve is why my vlan only works if there's
a
tcpdump -i vlan0 /dev/null
running on my pfsense box. If thats not running I simply see no data.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan
On 11/8/06, Craig FALCONER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should work - I've been playing with vlans and got it all working.
The only weirdness I have left to solve is why my vlan only works if there's
a
tcpdump -i vlan0 /dev/null
running on my pfsense box. If thats not running I simply see no
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/8/06, Craig FALCONER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should work - I've been playing with vlans and got it all working.
The only weirdness I have left to solve is why my vlan only works if
there's a tcpdump -i vlan0 /dev/null
running on my
On 11/8/06, Craig FALCONER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/8/06, Craig FALCONER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should work - I've been playing with vlans and got it all working.
The only weirdness I have left to solve is why my vlan only works if
On 11/8/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/06, Craig FALCONER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/8/06, Craig FALCONER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should work - I've been playing with vlans and got it all working.
The only weirdness I
Thanks everyone, it worked.For future reference, here's how: I created a new VLAN and assigned it to the Metro Ethernet interface. Then I added the VLAN as a new interface and enabled it, assigning a static IP in a different IP range from the Metro Ethernet interface. I rebooted next for the
Title: Message
So you
have a two-way metrosexual connection?
-Original Message-From: Nathan Osborne
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2006 9:39
a.m.To: support@pfsense.comSubject: Re: [pfSense
Support] VLAN trunking?It's a pretty short distance and
Bill Marquette wrote:
Doesn't really make any sense. We already are doing a background
TCPDUMP to get the firewall logs.
On pflog0. This is on the vlan interface which really is bizarre. I
could see if for some reason the physical fxp interface wasn't in
PROMISC mode needing to do it for
Heya - not wishing to argue, but I'm really telling the truth.
vlan0 is 192.168.200.1/24 and the workstation is at 192.168.200.2
# ping 192.168.200.2
PING 192.168.200.2 (192.168.200.2): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.200.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=4.221 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.200.2:
Craig FALCONER wrote:
Heya - not wishing to argue, but I'm really telling the truth.
Oh, hey Craig, didn't realize it was you that started this. :)
All I can think of is more Nokia weirdness. This is an IP330 with three
on-board NICs.
The IPxxx boxes certainly do have special
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Craig FALCONER wrote:
Heya - not wishing to argue, but I'm really telling the truth.
Here's kind of an out of left field idea...
Someone mentioned that running tcpdump on a vlan interface actually
*breaks* it. By breaks, I'm betting that means sends the vlan traffic
I suspect this is not the answer. I ran tcpdump net 192.168.200.0/24 on a
third machine and there's no traffic detected. I'm using a dumb unmanaged
switch which makes it more confusing.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2006
It *IS* promiscuous mode that's making it work.
With tcpdump running in the background
# ifconfig vlan0
vlan0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet 192.168.200.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.200.255
inet6 fe80::2a0:8eff:fef6:6ae8%vlan0
20 matches
Mail list logo
