Yesterday I tried to get pfSense running again on one of our firewalls which
currently runs monowall.
I used the snapshot from http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/iso/
from the 5th of March.
Hardware is a DELL PowerEdge SC 1425, with 4 Network interfaces.
During installation it disp
Possible tangent (apologies)- I haven't tried any BSD variants on the current
Dell PowerEdge series, but I have tried Fedora, CentOS, and Suse, and had
problems with the built-in NIC on all of them. Are you using this built-in NIC
in your bridge? Are you able to have it work alright in pfSense o
On Mar 5, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Dan Farrell wrote:
Possible tangent (apologies)- I haven't tried any BSD variants on
the current Dell PowerEdge series, but I have tried Fedora, CentOS,
and Suse, and had problems with the built-in NIC on all of them.
Are you using this built-in NIC in your bri
Hello,
I've got pfSense 1.0.1 (CD-ROM platform) running on a client's SOHO.
Last week they had a power failure and the UPS gave up the ghost before
a clean shutdown could be performed.
Fortunately. the client used the CLI interface to save the
configuration settings to a floppy disc before the p
Hi.
My routing problem:
router internet with .20.145 (an ethernet connection from fiber).
Pfsense machine1 with 4 eth.
LAN with 1.1 xl0
WAN with 27.41 with default gw .20.146 in xl1
OPT1 with 20.146 with default gw .20.145 in xl3
Default gw .20.145
This machine run's fine if I put 1.1 like gw in
What should it read on the fresh install ?
It's a productive system... it's hard to reinstall in between...
On the non-working-system it reads:
# ipfw show
00030 147403 130387849 skipto 5 ip from any to any in via fxp0 keep-state
00030 43395 63498221 skipto 5 ip from any to any in via f
On 3/5/07, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What should it read on the fresh install ?
It's a productive system... it's hard to reinstall in between...
Right, but it must work, correct? :) If you could get a reading from
a box that works, it would be most helpful.
Scott
I'll try to get a fresh install on the same system as soon as possible...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 5. März 2007 20:52
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
On 3/5/07, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PR
I don't get how the 2 machines are connected to each other but you probably are
missing some routes somewhere.
Please provide more details, maybe a small ascii diagram to describe the
topology.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Manuel Trujillo Albarral [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
G
Hi, Scott !
Fresh install shows the following, but does not work also :-(
00030 7882 4784874 skipto 5 ip from any to any in via fxp0 keep-state
00030 1445 1633539 skipto 5 ip from any to any in via fxp2 keep-state
00030 0 0 skipto 5 ip from any to any in via fxp1 keep-stat
On 3/5/07, Doug Poland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I've got pfSense 1.0.1 (CD-ROM platform) running on a client's SOHO.
Last week they had a power failure and the UPS gave up the ghost before
a clean shutdown could be performed.
Fortunately. the client used the CLI interface to save the
c
I have a system setup running bandwithd from snapshot 2/27/2007 and I
just noticed that all my hosts that are assigned their IP addresses
dynmically via DHCP do not resolve and have "Configure DNS to reverse
this IP). If it is a hosts that is statically assigned via DHCP or is
statically se
On 3/5/07, Ronald L. Rosson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a system setup running bandwithd from snapshot 2/27/2007 and I just
noticed that all my hosts that are assigned their IP addresses dynmically
via DHCP do not resolve and have "Configure DNS to reverse this IP). If it
is a hosts tha
I was wondering when you are going to have support for Domain names
rather than just ip's for this platform. I like what you guys are
doing, but my biggest complaint is that you don't have domain name
support for your platform. FreeBSD's pf supports domain names in the
firewall rules, so why
On 3/5/07, Jared Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was wondering when you are going to have support for Domain names
rather than just ip's for this platform. I like what you guys are
doing, but my biggest complaint is that you don't have domain name
support for your platform. FreeBSD's pf s
Jared Griffith wrote:
I was wondering when you are going to have support for Domain names
rather than just ip's for this platform. I like what you guys are
doing, but my biggest complaint is that you don't have domain name
support for your platform. FreeBSD's pf supports domain names in the
On Mar 5, 2007, at 3:09 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 3/5/07, Ronald L. Rosson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a system setup running bandwithd from snapshot 2/27/2007
and I just
noticed that all my hosts that are assigned their IP addresses
dynmically
via DHCP do not resolve and have "
On 3/5/07, Ronald L. Rosson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I assume you are talking about the DNS servers listed in http://
yourpfsense/system.php.
My setup has public DNS servers listed here. Should it be set to
itself for the DNS servers and have the box checked for "Allow DNS
server list to b
On Mar 5, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 3/5/07, Ronald L. Rosson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I assume you are talking about the DNS servers listed in http://
yourpfsense/system.php.
My setup has public DNS servers listed here. Should it be set to
itself for the DNS servers and
What really irritates m eis the fact that the mac filtering in the captive
portal works well with wpa_2.
Any cohenerce between mac and username auth ?
Any clues for that ?
Greets, Martin !
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 5. März
On 3/5/07, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Scott !
Fresh install shows the following, but does not work also :-(
[snip]
01100 0 0 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x888e
I don't see the traffic counter increasing on this test. Did you
actually test login again
I found a potential issue. Please test a snapshot around two hours from now.
Scott
On 3/5/07, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/5/07, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Scott !
>
> Fresh install shows the following, but does not work also :-(
[snip]
> 01100 0
22 matches
Mail list logo
