On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Tim Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree... and also try completely removing the Untangle box from the
network to see if the problem clears up.
Hi
thanks all the people support.
let me clarify as the people asking why iam using both the product
simple
simple reason, UT does not have capitive portal.
So you're just wanting to use the captive portal on pfSense? What
services on the UT are you using?
Fact of captive portal which is MAC based, and UT is a b-router so passing
it's own MAC. See the m0n0wall and pfsense mail lists for support on
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM, RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
simple reason, UT does not have capitive portal.
So you're just wanting to use the captive portal on pfSense? What
services on the UT are you using?
iam using all the Services of UT, iam using PF for authentication and DHCP
Does Untangle have the ability to do a TCP dump? I could enable that in the
inside interface and then the outside interface on UT, compare the two and
see what you come up with. It may be worthwhile to do this on the external
side of pf as well. If UT's bridge mode is truly bridge, then you
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Paul Peziol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there plans for snort or replacment in the 1.3 verions or what can I do
as a replacement for it. I was planning on putting it in on a network that
has a few webservers on it to help secure it alittle more. Any
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Bryan Derman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: There is nothing in your config that requires AON, ...
---
You're correct. It was historical* and I've now
reduced/fixed/tested/deployed the config:
Now: http://www.derman.com/Misc/router/pfSenseReduced.html
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:22 AM, ram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iam using all the Services of UT, iam using PF for authentication and DHCP
Server
Since you seem either uninterested or incapable of telling us anything
other than I have object foo with all the knobs turned on and most
of us
Re: Can you open a bug ticket at http://cvstrac.pfsense.org with specific
steps on replicating the problem?
---
Yes, I've been working towards producing an MFE (minimal faulty example).
Think I have it, (hopefully) just need a final QA pass. If that's it,
then it looks like it's related to having
Mr RB
I belive you do not have Idea what exactly UT Does
UT claims that they have webfilter, IDS, Firewall, SPAM protection lot more
you can refer their features, ( iam yet to test)
so iam not comparing the any products here, so iam not going to do marketing
call
since i have situation where
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Curtis LaMasters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Untangle have the ability to do a TCP dump? I could enable that in the
inside interface and then the outside interface on UT, compare the two and
see what you come up with. It may be worthwhile to do this on the
how is your network setup?
1 PC ---switch UT ---pfsense
or
2 PC ---switch ---pfsense UT
I would suggest trying 2 since you just want the CP on pfsense
sai
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Curtis LaMasters
11 matches
Mail list logo
