>and in the WAN2 interface,I set Type to static,IP address to
>192.168.1.254/32,Gateway to 192.168.1.1.
I believe you want it to be 192.168.1.254/24
Right now the gateway and static IP are in two different subnets.
-tim
-
To un
Dear All,
I have set my leased line(static IP) in the WAN interface,and it is
working fine.
Now I need to do a failover to it,however,the back up line is ADSL,
I have to use a router to do the PPPoe dial up,and connected the
router(I have set it IP:192.168.1.1) to the soekris ETH2.
and in th
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Hall [mailto:dun...@viator.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 8:47 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Re: NanoBSD on WRAP
Simon Thomson wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Pingle [mailto:li...@pingle.org]
> Sent: Tues
Simon Thomson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jim Pingle [mailto:li...@pingle.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 15 December 2009 9:07 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Re: NanoBSD on WRAP
On 12/15/2009 6:31 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Ugo Bellavance schrieb:
I like th
-Original Message-
From: Jim Pingle [mailto:li...@pingle.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 15 December 2009 9:07 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Re: NanoBSD on WRAP
On 12/15/2009 6:31 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Ugo Bellavance schrieb:
>> I like this answer, and there are rea
> Got a small issue here. Basically, I replaced a DLINK router with a base
> pfSense setup. Now, although all of my machines can ping one another, they
> don't seem to be auto-sensing one another -- no machines show up in Network
> Neighborhood, etc. Are there any special items or special fir
Op 15 dec 2009, om 22:03 heeft li...@mgreg.com het volgende geschreven:
> Got a small issue here. Basically, I replaced a DLINK router with a base
> pfSense setup. Now, although all of my machines can ping one another, they
> don't seem to be auto-sensing one another -- no machines show up in
Hi All,
Got a small issue here. Basically, I replaced a DLINK router with a base
pfSense setup. Now, although all of my machines can ping one another, they
don't seem to be auto-sensing one another -- no machines show up in Network
Neighborhood, etc. Are there any special items or special fi
I see. Well the the only other thing I can think of is the password type i.e.
m5,chap, etc must be different between the moonwall and pfsesnse boxes.
Mike
From: Tancinco, Jon
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:51 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal RADIUS
Hi Mike.
The authentication requests go through to the Radius server...and we get
a bad password error.
It's weird. All the same settings work under m0n0wall. Same IPs, same
radius server. I'm not sure how different pfSense is compared to the
m0n0wall app. The Captive Portal setup looks
On 15/12/09 14:35, Seth Mos wrote:
> Paul Mansfield schreef:
>> On 14/12/09 23:47, Jeppe Øland wrote:
>>> As for the PCIe wireless card: it's a MSI brand card, using a Ralink
>>> NIC.
>>> (MS-6894, Ralink chip: RTL8187SE)
>>> I guess thats a RealTek wireless card ... probably next to useless for
>>
Paul Mansfield schreef:
On 14/12/09 23:47, Jeppe Øland wrote:
As for the PCIe wireless card: it's a MSI brand card, using a Ralink NIC.
(MS-6894, Ralink chip: RTL8187SE)
I guess thats a RealTek wireless card ... probably next to useless for
pfSense or?
realtek != ralink
I've previously have
On 14/12/09 23:47, Jeppe Øland wrote:
> As for the PCIe wireless card: it's a MSI brand card, using a Ralink NIC.
> (MS-6894, Ralink chip: RTL8187SE)
> I guess thats a RealTek wireless card ... probably next to useless for
> pfSense or?
realtek != ralink
yup, that's a realtek
since reading some
Jim Pingle schrieb:
>
> Which model ALIX do you have?
alix2d1
according to the receipt.
> It says on the page that there are some
> excluded models, usually it's the ones with VGA that require a different
> BIOS. Did the image not boot at all? Or what did it do?
>
IIRC, the ALIX basically
On 12/15/2009 6:31 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Ugo Bellavance schrieb:
>> I like this answer, and there are really 2 facts that are highlighted
>> here:
>>
>> - Users will always complain
>> - The better your product and product history, the less users will
>> read the warnings. PfSense has always
Ugo Bellavance schrieb:
> On 2009-12-14 22:17, Chris Buechler wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Scott Ullrich
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/NanoBSD_on_WRAP
Has someone done the first ste
On 2009-12-14 22:17, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/NanoBSD_on_WRAP
Has someone done the first step what would be kind enough to put the
resulting image
17 matches
Mail list logo
