Hello Gentle Developers & Readers,
I am simply dying of curiosity to know when a 2.0 release candidate
might be available ...
There is so much new functionality that I'm giddy with anticipation :-)
Thanks
M
-
To unsubscribe
Well, I'm making progress. In the 2.0 I added a 2nd phase 2 for the 2nd
network. In the 1.2.3 side I added a 2nd identical tunnel. When I goto to
the status page on the 1.2.3 I get green arrows on both. On the 2.0beta side
I get a green arrow for the original 192.168.2.0 network but a yellow X on
t
Yes you will setup seperate tunnel for each subnet..I also get this error at
times but it is fine after restarting racoon
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Peziol wrote:
> This is what I get on the 1.2.3 side: racoon: *[Unknown Gateway/Dynamic]*:
> ERROR: no policy found: 192.168.20.0/2
This is what I get on the 1.2.3 side: racoon: *[Unknown Gateway/Dynamic]*:
ERROR: no policy found: 192.168.20.0/24[0] 192.168.4.0/24[0] proto=any
dir=in
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Paul Peziol wrote:
> How would I set that up.Do I need 2 separate tunnels created or can I use 1
> tunnel to r
How would I set that up.Do I need 2 separate tunnels created or can I use 1
tunnel to route both networks. I tried to setup both subnets in the 2.0
version to connect to the 1.2.3 (that has 2 subnets) and it would error
out.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Abdulrehman wrote:
> Yes you can...I
Yes you can...Inface I have 3 different subnets on IPsec.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Paul Peziol wrote:
> I have come across where pfsense 2.0 can support multiple networks over
> ipsec. Can I create a tunnel between pfsense 1.2.3rc1 and 2.0beta2.
> I have a 192.168.20.0/24 network behind
I have come across where pfsense 2.0 can support multiple networks over
ipsec. Can I create a tunnel between pfsense 1.2.3rc1 and 2.0beta2.
I have a 192.168.20.0/24 network behind the 2.0 pfsense (Site A) and behind
the 1.2.3 I have 192.168.2.0/24 and 192.168.4.0/24 (Site B). Is it possible
create
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Fuchs, Martin
wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I’ve got a question !
>
>
>
> We have the following setup:
>
>
>
> WAN 195.x.x.x/29 --- WAN pfSense - LAN 10.x.x.x/16
>
> |
>
>
On WAN we have 195.22x.234.90 with GW 195.22x.234.89 / 29 mask.
On DMZ weh have 195.22x.234.97 /97 (where 22x is the same as out WAN). There is
nothing natted nor bridged or else, it'all routed.
On LAN we have 10.0.0.0/16 (NATted) and another VPN-Interface owns the
172,16,100,0/24
On out WAN the
- pfSense version 1.2.3-RC3
- Squid 2.6.21_08.
- SquidGuard 1.3-2.
- Yahoo Messenger 10.0.0.1267
- Workstation with the problem is using windows XP Pro SP2 (windows firewall
turned off)
Hi, I can't connect with yahoo messenger. I have set all website access to
allowed for that client machine's IP
I am having a problem with Cisco VPN clients unable to connect through
pfSense. To a cisco VPN concentrator on the internet. I did a packet
capture and I am seeing fragmented ISAKMP packets, leading to malformed
packets. This is from the laptop to the VPN server, sniffing on the
pfsense. I have
This is a poke in the dark, but I ran into a number of Xbox live issues with a
3G Router setup. The Xbox worked fine on the cable connection (which is what we
were getting rid of) but once we hooked it up to the 3G Router it would not
work. The 3G router was controlled by the ISP and so I have n
Op 26/05/2010 17:37, Trevor Benson schreef:
Is there a reason your still running RC3 instead of the final 1.2.3 release? RC's
shouldn't be considered stable production releases however many people use them in
production for testing. I had quirks in 1.2.3 RC2&3 but would have rolled back
to
It sounds to me like you already answered your own question.
You said he plugged his xbox directly into a public ip "bypassing his router",
I assume you mean bypassing the firewall/router not the CPE device acting as a
bridge or router from the ISP (without which you dont have internet). If you
Your configuration seems a bit strange.
First is your DMZ on the SAME wan network or is it another block of
195.x.x.x/29? Faking your numbers instead of letter replacements might make it
easier to understand (ie are they both 195.1.2.0/29 or is another
195.2.3.0/29?).
Are you bridging you
I use an IPSEC connection between two DDNS locations, and it never goes
down. Both endpoints are on 1.2.3 FINAL release.
Marc R. Meshurle, Jr.
President, MCP
Kato Technology Solutions, Inc.
Exton, PA. 19341
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Benson [mailto:tben...@a-1networks.com]
Sent: W
Is there a reason your still running RC3 instead of the final 1.2.3 release?
RC's shouldn't be considered stable production releases however many people use
them in production for testing. I had quirks in 1.2.3 RC2&3 but would have
rolled back to 1.2.2 if I wanted stability instead of testing
Gokhan Mollamehmetoglu wrote:
Hi;
when I install a package occur error.
unable the retrieve package info from www.pfsense.com.Cached data will
be used"
What version of pfSense? 32 or 64 bit? Can you ping www.pfsense.com from
this box?
Most probably DNS issues.
-
Hi;
when I install a package occur error.
unable the retrieve package info from www.pfsense.com.Cached data will
be used"
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@
19 matches
Mail list logo
