This is exactly what I saw on both RC3 and 1.0
Wade B
On 11/1/06, Kyle Mott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
I recently updated to 1.0.1, but my OpenVPN config stopped working.
Naturally, I rebooted, and it worked for a while, then stopped again.
So, I disabled/enabled the tunnel, and
AnyoneBueller...Bueller..?
-W
On 10/29/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey good morning all,
I think I may have misread the HW support list ;~) I purchased
a Netgear WG311V2 Rev A2 wifi card and I get kernel: pci0: network
at device 17.0 (no driver
but as it is not detected at your pfsense it's most
likely that it's a not supported one.
One thing to try is to disable pnp os in the bios if your system has a setting
for that and retry.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Captain Bablam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30
but as it is not detected at your pfsense it's most
likely that it's a not supported one.
One thing to try is to disable pnp os in the bios if your system has a
setting for that and retry.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Captain Bablam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30
Hey good morning all,
I think I may have misread the HW support list ;~) I purchased
a Netgear WG311V2 Rev A2 wifi card and I get kernel: pci0: network
at device 17.0 (no driver attached) and, you guessed it, no wifi card
recognized in the system. Is this card supported today? If not are
Good morning Ryan,
Can you send the pix debugs as well? I think you are right, this
looks like a phase 1 setup problem, it maybe that PF and the pix are
having trouble playing nice on the negotiation of your current phase 1
params. If you send the pix debugs I think I will have a better
Good morning all,
I have replaced a linux box as my core distribution router with
a PFsense box. I noticed that the designated WAN interface must have a
gateway (default route) defined or the PHP interface will not allow
you to commit the interface config. My desire for this core router is
Understood,
That would be a great option if I wasn't complicating matters by
load sharing over OPT2 and WAN. Thanks for the feedback Chris.
-W
On 10/14/06, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Captain Bablam wrote:
Good morning all,
I have replaced a linux box as my core
Thanks Scott,
You are a rock star.
-W
On 10/14/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do this from Diagnotics - Command - PHP Command:
unset($config['interfaces']['wan']['gateway']);
write_config();
On 10/14/06, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Captain Bablam wrote:
Good
What does your NAT configuration look like?
On the PFsense and on the Cisco side? Does the suddenly natted
traffic look as though it is sourced from the public IP of the
PFsense?
Wade B
Wade B
On 10/11/06, Pierre Frisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a baffling problem:
Good morning Rob,
No I am running this over TCP, I can lower the ping time and see
if that makes a difference.
Wade B
On 10/11/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good afternoon all,
I am seeing two strange behaviours
Is this server side?
I did not see it in the client side config, thanks Scott.
-W
On 10/11/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remove the custom --ping-restart command.
On 10/11/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning Rob,
No I am running this over TCP, I
Hey good afternoon Alvaro,
Did you check to see if ISAKMP and IPSEC SAs were established on
each end? If the SA's are established then IPsec is up and your are
looking at routing or packet filtering issues. I would start there.
Wade B
On 10/10/06, Alvaro Pietrobono [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good afternoon all,
I am seeing two strange behaviours since upgrading to RC3;
1. FW rules will not apply without a restart of the firewall. I have
never seen this on the platform. I can actually see (denies in this
case) entries in the log for the rule(s) that were removed. My
rulebase is
I have pushed Openvpn through a bluecoat successfully,
Do you know if it is a configuration option or does it kill the
connection irrespective of configuration?
Wade B
On 10/4/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/4/06, Benoît Beaujault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
packet_id_free
Ensure that the two hosts can communicate.
On 9/28/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Failed on latest snapshot,
CLient side logs attached, server side coming.
-W
On 9/28/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try the image from the 27th. Your a day
Also,
I only get that complaint upon restart of the process, the initial
startup is fine, binds the port and all is good.
-W
On 9/28/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope,
Webgui is running on TCP/81.
-W
On 9/28/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use
of troubleshooting. Thanks Scott.
Wade B
On 9/28/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use a different port then if 443 is already in use (webGUI?)
Scott
On 9/28/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The host is up,
PPTP (not through a proxy) works fine. Here is an attempt
Good morning all,
The default quagga script that installed with the package did
not seem to do the trick. I modified it a little to include the
creation of the directory and perms where the PID file needs to live.
I can start the script manually /etc/rc.d/quagga start which is what
I have
for that to work ;~)
-W
On 9/28/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quagga is not working as of yet.
On 9/28/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning all,
The default quagga script that installed with the package did
not seem to do the trick. I modified
not working out of the box.
On 9/28/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works I just have to start it manually,
I have my entire internal network running on EBGP with crunched
down timers for fast convergence. It works awesome. The two others
peers are an openwrt box and an FC5 box
OK good to know thank you,
Are there plans to support quagga? I thought I saw that on the
list a while back?
-W
On 9/28/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone listed a link to the ports tree,
So I installed
Good morning all,
I upgraded from rc2 to 1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-21-06 built on Sat Sep 23
00:46:42 UTC 2006. Since that time I have seen sporadic issues
connecting to my openvpn server running on TCP/443 (I tried 80 as
well) stright connect and through a proxy. And at present it has just
stopped
SIGTERM[soft,init_instance]
received, process exiting
--
On 9/26/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning all,
I upgraded from rc2 to 1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-21-06 built on Sat Sep 23
Yup,
I did, and changed the listening port to 443 and 80, same result.
Keeping in mind this worked flawlessly on rc2 with no fw rules. And I
am logging the permits so I can see the traffic being permitted.
-W
On 9/26/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/06, Captain Bablam
Sent.
-W
On 9/26/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup,
I did, and changed the listening port to 443 and 80, same result.
Keeping in mind this worked flawlessly on rc2 with no fw rules. And I
am logging the permits so I
Upon rolling back to RC2 everything works as it did before.
-W
On 9/26/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent.
-W
On 9/26/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup,
I did, and changed the listening port to 443
27 matches
Mail list logo
