It was added to m0n0 after pfSense was forked. We never synced that code. You
could however create a notes file using "diagnostics/edit file" somewhere. That
one would not be backed up with the config of course.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Use the HP procurve 1800-8g. I use it at our office for the conference room
with multiple vlans trunked to a pfSense. Works fine, is gigabit and fanless
:-) It's around 120 euro. Btw, I got myself a 1800-24g for home which is
basically the same switch with 24 ports and options for 2 minigbics. F
Thanks for reporting. We moved the www site to a better server and I guess that
broke on the move. We'll fix it asap.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Angelo Turetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. März 2008 12:43
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Suppo
Also have a look at http://linitx.com/index.php . Linitx is also a
recommended vendor and supporter of the pfSense project.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 10:44 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] I ne
problem right now.
Connects instantly, but no DHCP.
Thanks again,
~Tim
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 11:23 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Stange Problem with WRAP / Wireless
Is your wireless card
N BRIDGE MODE ---> NETWORK SWITCH --> SERVERS AND WORKSTATIONS
This problem was happening before the Untangled Server was installed, so
I don't believe this is the problem.
Thanks,
~Tim
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2
Is your wireless card bridged to the lan interface and your lan
interface is not always up? unfortunately a bridge will only work if all
interfaces in the bridgegroup are up, which mean if your lan is
unplugged your wireless interface won't work.
Holger
From: Ti
k this
> rule should be added automatical when bridging those Interfaces ...
>
> Am 18.10.2007 um 18:05 schrieb Holger Bauer:
>
> > From a quick discussion here on the hackathon this might be
> something
> > that we need to prohibit for 1.2. So we most likely will setup
>From a quick discussion here on the hackathon this might be something that we
>need to prohibit for 1.2. So we most likely will setup some sanity check that
>won't let you setup another bridge. This seems to require code that is
>available in the headbranch and 1.2 is too close to release to ba
What you are talking about is already worked on and will be available in
a future version. Stay tuned, we are not there yet ;-)
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Robison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 1:23 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: [pfS
The Alix boards will be about a similiar price like the wraps but far
more powerful. I would wait until they are available (soon) as either
the left wraps get cheaper then or you get a more powerful platform for
around the same price ;-)
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Khera [mailt
If you are using the reauthenticate users every minute against an
external Radiusserver with the CP that might explain the load. Search
the m0n0list for the designlimitations of the current CP implementation
and why that will cause problems when having lots of users. We currently
don't do any work
4801 will be too weak for this or at least run under heavy load all the
time. If you want to use some services and need ipsec encryption for
example it will definately be too weak. Go for a 5501. I heard from one
of the developers that it performs pretty good.
Holger
> -Original Message-
No, just enable it, hit save and enjoy.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Cabot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 5:17 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] LAN access to virtual IP port forwards
>
> Thanks Scott. Do I have to delet
Easiest way to do so is to visit the preconfigured captive portal page and save
it locally on your computer. Then edit that file until it fits your needs. You
can reupload your modified version right at the config page of the captive
portal (lower section of the page). Make sure the needed form-
Have a look at http://doc.m0n0.ch/handbook-single/#FAQ.hiddenopts .
These options apply to pfSense as well. You can hardcode the speed and
duplex by adding the appropriate flag to your downloaded config.xml and
reupload it again.
# interfaces/(if)/media and interfaces/(if)/mediaopt
If you need to
This is not possible unfortunately. To kind of "kill states" of inactive
pass rules we had to introduce an ipfw block on top of the pf filter.
This was the only way to do it (we really investigated all other
possibilities). That said, it won't work for your scenario as an
inactive pass will cause
Not with static routes but this should be doable using policybased
routing using firewallrules with appropriate gateways.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Brookenmire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:04 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: [pfSense Supp
The snpashotserver is building images/isos/updates constantly from the
current code so usually just grab a snapshot that was build around 2-3
hours ago after you have been told a bug should be fixed.
Holger
From: Alvaro Pietrobono [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
This was fixed last night. Please try a newer snapshot.
_
From: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:39 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] pfSense NAT and DynDNS after
IP-change
Upgrading is already doable with the latest snapshots. See
http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1_2/updates/
>
pfSense-Full-And-Embedded-Update-1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-XX-XX-.
tgz
Upgrading a 1.0.1 to that snanpshot via webgui on embeddeds works fine.
For new installs I would re
This will be a feature of 1.3 (like the dashboard) as well. However we
are using our own implementation, not the one m0n0 has.
Holger
From: Mohd Saidy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 10:23 AM
To: support@pfsense.c
http://pfsense.org/mirror.php?section=tutorials/mobile_ipsec/
-Original Message-
From: Tim Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 11:20 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] IPSEC Mobile Client
I've been banging my head on the wall trying to get remo
This will appear in a version past 1.2, most likely 1.3.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: David Strout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 11:42 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] cookie/session expire
As usual, I installed the newest 1.2-BETA-1 and f
You shouldn't do those commandline operations. However now as you have
done So I suggest upgrading to the latest 1.2beta1 first. If there are
still config.xml items it should reinstall the package on reboot if
needed. If that fails try to kick off a reinstall from system>packages.
Holger
__
nse.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] REDIRECT_STATUS && CGI
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I just have mini_httpd.
> Holger Bauer wrote:
> > Any chance that you have another webserver running with the same
> > IP-Adres
Any chance that you have another webserver running with the same
IP-Adress on a different machine? I don't think this message comes from
the pfSense.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:30 AM
> To: support@
You don't start anything from the shell. SSH can be enabled from the
webgui at system>advanced.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 5:32 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] ssh daemon
-BEGIN P
- DHCP-Server enabled at LAN-Interface
- pfSense LAN IP 192.168.1.1
- webgui at http://192.168.1.1 , User "admin" password "pfsense"
- DHCP-Client at WAN
- Block anything incoming at WAN
- Allow anything coming from LAN
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh [mailto:[EMAIL P
You most likely don't run a latest snapshot but a releaseversion which
has a different gui. Please make sure you are on a version from
http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1_2/ which has the gui
mentioned at http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-Wan/Load-Balancing .
Holger
-Original
Nothing has changed regarding Intel Wireless NIC support. It's a freebsd
issue, not a pfSense one.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Christian Veith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 8:22 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Get WLAN Working with In
The older the data the more it is "rounded". This happens as the
database of the RRD graphs is not growing out of size but is using some
roundrobin logic to store the additional information. This way it even
works on embeddeds with limited storage for long uptimes without filling
the cfmedia up.
H
Loadbalancing only works when using Routing/NAT. It's not possible with
transparent/bridged interfaces.
Holger
From: AngChorEng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 9:43 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [
Delete the tunnels SAs at status>ipsec.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: David Wadson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 7:48 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Restart a single IPSEC tunnel
Is there a way to force a single IPSEC tunnel to reconne
You do not need to forward anything. When your users connect they will
become part of your local network. However as you have chosen different
networks for the PPTP Clients and LAN (unless I have some
misinterpretation here) you have to make sure your PPTP Clients use the
remote subnets gateway as
nly closed.
Please this issue is very important to me and I want your help to find a
solution for it
Regards
Bassam
-Original Message-----
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 4:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] How to get back
Yes, getting closer each day ;-)
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Rob Terhaar
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 6:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Usermanager code commited to releng_1
>
> On 4/12/
There is no way to logout then. You'll have to wait for the idle timout
or the hard timeout to kick your session then.
Holger
From: Bassam A. Al-Khaffaf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 3:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [pfSense Sup
Squid requires a version newer than 1.0.1 I think. Upgrade to a
snapshot, reinstall the squidpackage and retest please.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [pfSense Support] pr
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-Wan/Load-Balancing
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 11:13 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] OK, I think this is simple...
I don't have thos config, but
pport into pfSense, assuming that
would be a replacement to PPTP?
--Tim Nelson
Holger Bauer wrote:
> You can't imagine how much time we already spent on testing/debugging/working
> on PPTP. We even have been working with the Author of the frickin pptp proxy
> on this and create
You can't imagine how much time we already spent on testing/debugging/working
on PPTP. We even have been working with the Author of the frickin pptp proxy on
this and created a package to make pptp between the same public endpoints
possible. It's simply broken and the issue is freebsd/pf related
Please don't switch the topics of your mails concerning the same issue
constantly. It's hard to follow/track a vonversation this way. Thank
you.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Goley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 2:42 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
>
to be manually initiated then
> maintained by ping host?
>
> Where can I check whether the ping host packet was indeed fired?
>
> Regards,
> Kelvin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:04
I'm using it in a 13 dynamic IP locations to one static IP location as
concentrator without issues. You probably use a wrong monitor IP? You
have to use an IP of the remote end's local subnet behind the tunnel
(has to be an IP that's inside the tunneldefinition of the remote end).
Holger
___
My contribution to freeware Windows editors: http://www.pspad.com/
Won't cause any issues with modifying pfSense files either and my
favourite.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Hanle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:58 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subjec
It's already implemented in out HEAD codetree but pretty untested
currently. Don't expect this to appear in a release before 2.0 (might
change but there is no plan on porting it to the 1.x branch currently).
Holger
From: Tommaso Di Donato [mailto:[EMAIL
You are missing some patience, we are working on the issue.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: David Strout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 12:30 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] embedded image RO file system ..
Am i missing something with the
Any IP in the remote subnet range (remote internal IP that is inside the
remote subnet tunnel definition). It doesn't even have to answer or
exist. It's just to bring up the tunnel or keep it alive as there is
traffic for the remote subnet.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Vaughn L. Reid
Should already be fixed. Using snapshots currently might not be the best
idea as the work on timebasedrules feature is happening atm and is not
yet finished. Please use an older snapshot or wait for the feature to
be finished first.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Duffner [mailto:
Looks like your machines can't talk to each other and don't see each
others heartbeats. The ARP message is normal and can be ignored (it's in
the faq). Additionally check
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Setting_up_CARP_with_pfSense and
http://pfsense.org/mirror.php?section=tutorials/carp/carp-clus
Please don't crosspost. Choose either the forum, the mailinglist or IRC but not
ALL available support channels. I already answered this at the forum and it
even was answered in some other threads already. Please search before posting.
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,4012.0.html
Holge
k to this question. I tried to define outbound
NAT to selectively NAT certain IP addresses in the LAN to an NAT IP (for
example 202.172.250.1) in different subnet from the WAN IP (for example
202.172.254.202/24), but I have no luck.
Regards,
Kelvin
-----Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer
You got it correct. Other can be used if the provider is just routing these IPs
to you anyway like if you have one public IP and a public subnet (different
from your real WAN IP) that can be used behind that IP. This way you can NAT
these IPs to your private subnet hosts. This is often used in c
stop pfsense from working :-)
Thanks for the "confirmation"
Holger
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 10:21 +0100, Holger Bauer wrote:
I just checked some of my systems and they run at around 40 processes
for weeks/month. Almost a flatline. Do you run any packages on this
installation, if so wh
I just checked some of my systems and they run at around 40 processes for
weeks/month. Almost a flatline. Do you run any packages on this installation,
if so which are these. If you run a top can you identify the processes?
Something running multiple times?
Holger
Only local console eg. vga or com1. This setting requires a reboot to take
effect.
Holger
Von: Kelvin Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. März 2007 05:59
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] Disable Console Menu
I have a que
No, this is something completely different. We don't support any kind of dialup
connections. Only ethernet type interfaces are supported.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tortise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. März 2007 20:43
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSe
Looks like a client issue then. Do you run any "so called" mtu optimizers or
webaccelerators on the client? Some hardcode a higher mtu if you tell them to
optimize for dsl-lines for example.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Luca Lucchesi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freita
: Freitag, 9. März 2007 15:19
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer
Hi Holger, we built it on 31st Jan 2007. Has there been significant change
since then?
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:42 PM
To
ything will be ok?
Regards,
Kelvin
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:25 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer
Regarding 1: we'll check this
Regarding 2: Yes, you are right. You typicall want to even c
Regarding 1: we'll check this
Regarding 2: Yes, you are right. You typicall want to even create 3 pools for
this: one loadbalanced (WAN+OPT1), one failover WAN to OPT1 and one failover
OPT1 to WAN. Then just create firewallrules to make use of either of the pools.
This way you can have service
Embedded builds don't support packages (and we hide this option therefor from
the menu and you shouldn't use it). The filesystem is mounted readonly to not
let your cfcard wear out due to limited write cycle lifetime for embedded
builds. This is normal and by design.
Holger
__
Either go to system/advanced and set the following option:
Disable Firewall [x]
Disable the firewalls filter altogether.
Note: This basically converts pfSense into a routing only platform!
Note: This will turn off NAT!
Or
- Create pass any any any rules at firewall/rules, lan and wan tab
-
I'm afraid, I'm not able to test anything currently.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. März 2007 21:00
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: AW: [pfSense Support] latest snapshot and IPSec, NAT
Btw, i'm using pppoe to connec
Turning off the ftphelper and using passive mode with the ftp client behind the
pfSense should pretty much restore the m0n0 ftp behaviour I think.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. März 2007 17:00
An: support@pfsense.co
I don't get how the 2 machines are connected to each other but you probably are
missing some routes somewhere.
Please provide more details, maybe a small ascii diagram to describe the
topology.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Manuel Trujillo Albarral [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
G
?
Regards,
Kelvin
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 12:13 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal and DNS
You have to use the dnsforwarder of pfSense to use the captive portal.
It won't work
You have to use the dnsforwarder of pfSense to use the captive portal. It won't
work with another DNS-Server.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kelvin Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. März 2007 05:10
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] Captive Po
Just monitor the build dates. You need the next available build from now.
holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Samstag, 3. März 2007 21:29
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: AW: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
Well, yes, it's wpa-2 aes :
* | Gateway: * (Pass Powerbook to LAN)
>> PASS | Proto: * | Source: LAN2 net | Port: * | Destination: ! LAN net
>> | Port: * | Gateway: * (Block LAN2 from LAN)
>>
>> It seems to work...
>>
>> Have I introduced any sort of horrible security issue by doing this?
&
All config files get rewritten dynamically if needed so your changes won't be
in there for long. It has been discussed here already:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,1192.15.html
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Kemp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1
reloaded,
correct?
My main goal is to make LAN totally invisible as far as LAN2 is
concerned.
Thank you again for your help.
Mahalo,
Jeremy
On Feb 26, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Holger Bauer wrote:
> First create a DHCP-server fort he LAN2 segment at services/
> dhcpserver/lan2-tab and
Are you testing with the latest snapshot build? These are based on FreeBSD 6.2
and have newer drivers. If not please retest with a snapshot.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Pedro Paulo Oliveira Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 26. Februar 2007 15:38
An: support
First create a DHCP-server fort he LAN2 segment at services/dhcpserver/lan2-tab
and add a static mapping for the mac of your notebook.
Then go to firewall/rules/lan2tab
Add a rule: pass, protocol any, source (IP of notebook), destination any,
gateway default
Below this add a rule: pass protocol
This is unsupported but
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2811.msg22278.html#msg22278
might help you if you really want to go this way.
Holger
From: William Somerset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 4:37 PM
pfSense has an SMP kernel by default, no need to compile your own
kernel.
Bonding 2 nics to one pipe is not supported.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Vasile Cristescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 2:24 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSe
Try the suggestions from
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootOptions and
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootTroubleShooting
Holger
From: Abdul Aziz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 7:47 AM
To:
As you mention multiwan you might have to recreate the pools after
upgrading if you use loadbalancer pools due to the changed gui and
failoverfeature. Just edit them, delete all poolmembers and readd them
with the new gui logic.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAI
ing, etc.. It end up this way by mistake, actual and correct
configuration is to start from "vlan2" to "vlanN".
So in a couple of days I'll have the document prepared (.pdf) and the only
thing is to find out how am I going to upload it.
Cheers,
Michael
-Mensaje or
Michael,
No offense, but how about storing howtos/guides (like described in your mail)
at http://doc.pfsense.org and linking to it in your mailanswer next time? At
least if the answer is that extensive and general usable. This way the
documentation would become more and more complete.
Just a
Go to interfaces>assign, vlan tab and add vlans to the physical
interfaces where needed. Then switch back to the Interface assignments
tab and add the created vlans as interfaces. These vlan-interfaces will
now appear under the interfaces menu and can be used just like real
interfaces everywhere (f
Install the NUT-package. It has support for UPSes with GUI integration.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Josep Pujadas i Jubany [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 6:53 AM
> To: pfSense
> Subject: [pfSense Support] apcupsd
>
> Hello!
>
> Is it possible to
Sounds like a bug. For the meantime disable the DHCP at OPT1 before switching
to bridging configuration.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Pablo Montoro Escaño [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 9:57 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: [pfSense Support]
Sounds like hardwareissues. What version have you run previously? Maybe
you should upgrade to the latest snapshot again. Does it detect all your
available RAM on bootup?
Holger
-Original Message-
From: saidy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:25 AM
To: support@
h that might
> be the problem.
>
>
> On 2/4/07, Holger Bauer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It uses 5500 for reverse connection, 5800 for the http serverapplet
> > and 5900 for the server unless you changed the defaults.
> >
> > Holger
> >
> > __
It uses 5500 for reverse connection, 5800 for the http serverapplet and
5900 for the server unless you changed the defaults.
Holger
From: kevin hawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 1:47 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense S
Create a config.xml on a different system with enabled serial console.
Then move it to a dos formatted usbstick as /conf/config.xml and bootup
the livecd with the stick attached. It should come up with serial
console enabled.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Kyle Mott [mailto:[EMAIL P
t: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp failover & ISP Load balance
>
> Thank you for your answer. I'll wait for some modification of
> slbd's sensitivity.
>
> Nelu
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Holger Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> S
help.
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 3:59 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaper Question
Vlans are seen as seperate interfaces so you will end up with shaping
multiple interfaces again (or t
priority, will
PFsense understand that and prioritize it or am I over thinking this.
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:06 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaper Question
It allows you to specify
I don't have an answer to your questions but the screenshots at your
page look promising :-)
You could maybe create a package for pfSense to make it a monitoring
appliance.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007
It allows you to specify 2 Interfaces and that is what currently is
supported. Unfortunately multi Interface shaping is pretty much voodoo
magic. There is work going on to support this in the future (
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2718.0.html ). Some people have
multiinterface shaping wo
> My issue with loadbalancing is only from one of ISP and I've
> tried some different monitor IP with no change. Can I make
> the loadbalancing test less sensitive by increasing the ping
> time out or number of pings?
>
> Nelu
>
>
> - Original Message -
&g
Please don't use this document for setting it up. It's outdated. I
recommend getting one of the newer snapshots from
http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/ as they have a new
mechanism of pool creation that should be much easier.
It comes down to basically just setup the pool(s) and util
What you see is caused by unreliable monitor Ips (they don't answer to
pings all the time). Try to use different monitor IP for your pools.
Loadbalancing is stable. I'm using it at several locations without
issues. However with the latest snapshots a new feature (failover pools)
was added and the p
Create a portforward on interface LAN with external adress ANY to make
this kind of redirect.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Ronald L. Rosson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 11:40 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Redirect Rules
I am r
Have a look at http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootOptions
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: sai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 12:36 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] APIC problems
>
> APIC is usually settable in BIOS.
Check your hardware. Maybe some RAM disappeared / became defective. This
message will only pop up if your complete system ram was detected to be
less than 128 mb on bootup.
Holger
From: Mohd Saidy Bin Mohd Yusof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Yes.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Christian Veith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 10:29 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Embedded 1.0-RELEASE Password in PPPoE configuration
readable
Hi at all,
i´ve just setup pfsense 1.0-RELEASE on
1 - 100 of 529 matches
Mail list logo
