Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:05:35 -0300
To: support@pfsense.com
From: alexandre.fguimar...@gmail.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Could not unlock lock.
What does these errors mean?
Sep 1 11:00:11 php[878]: /index.php: WARNING: unlock() - Could not unlock
lock.
Sep 1 10:59:26 php[789]:
To: support@pfsense.com
From: vand...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:56:03 +0200
Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: odd sip firewall issue
[...]
Thanks for the help.
When I do a dump on the pflog0 interface than I see the packets coming
in but now to the internal address instead
To: support@pfsense.com
From: vand...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:07:03 +0200
Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: odd sip firewall issue
Tebano epaminonda wrote:
To: support@pfsense.com
From: vand...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:56:03 +0200
Subject: [pfSense
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:27:37 +0200
From: caroline.ste...@univ-rennes1.fr
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Hardware Configuration
Why not !
I have a Dell R610, so if PfSense works and recognize your network card,
it will normally not a problem for me ;-)
From: francisco.cabr...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:15:10 +0100
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Question about multi-wan
Hi Tebano,
Sorry for just reply now.
---
You're welcome! :)
---
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Tebano epaminonda l_epa_m_ino
Hi!
Sorry for html settings...
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:17:20 +0100
From: francisco.cabr...@gmail.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Question about multi-wan
Hi,
I have up and running pfSense 1.2.3-RC2
I have two adsl lines, wan and wan1 connections up and running for each
Hi all.I'm exploring features embedded into pfsense, and I was looking to
interesting features as RRD graphics of system activityes.
I've read on RRD also improvements introduced from the use of packages:
NfSen - Netflow.
Do You think will be this packages ported in pfsense in the future?
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:43:31 -0400
From: evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
From: Webmaster Megastar [mailto:webmas...@megastar.fr]
Sent: June 11, 2009 2:35 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject:
-
Hi Josè.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
I was simply trying to say that there aren't other limitation (that I know),
except the ones I've pasted You.
Probably my answer wasn't really wroten correctly... sorry!Cheers.Tebano.
From: Tebano
is arriving, so I'm sure there's a
difference between every-ones...:-)Cheers.Tebano.
From: Tebano epaminonda
[mailto:l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 12 June 2009 11:44
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Inbound load balancer performance under
heavy load
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:03:45 -0400
From: evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
From: Tebano epaminonda [mailto:l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com]
Sent: June 12, 2009 4:11 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:34:40 +0200
From: webmas...@megastar.fr
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
There is a bug when you want to
setup multiwan + load balancing + carp. The development team is aware
of this. It seems
From: rakthu...@advanceagro.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:38:35 +0700
Subject: [pfSense Support] Squid package installed
Hello all
Sorry to disturb again. I install squid package and it's say
installation completed but I can find any package
in
From: benjamin.fro...@login-online.de
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:28:53 +0200
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] keep alive
Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 20:20 +0100 schrieb Paul Cockings:
I've tried setting SystemAdvancedFirewall Optimization
Options:conservative as
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:55:06 -0400
From: c...@pfsense.org
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Webmaster
Megastarwebmas...@megastar.fr wrote:
There is a bug when you want to setup multiwan +
From: l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:32:43 +0200
Subject: RE2: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:55:06 -0400
From: c...@pfsense.org
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support]
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 23:13:00 -0400
From: c...@pfsense.org
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Tebano epaminonda
l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com wrote:
Sorry, Guys.
I where discussing of limitation
:03 AM, Tebano epaminonda wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 23:13:00 -0400
From: c...@pfsense.org
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Tebano epaminonda
l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com wrote:
Sorry, Guys.
I
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:11:21 -0400
From: evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
From: Tebano
epaminonda [mailto:l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com]
Sent: June 10, 2009 10:04 AM
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:33:27 -0400
From: evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
From: Tebano
epaminonda [mailto:l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com]
Sent: June 10, 2009 12:20 PM
, May 31, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Tebano epaminonda
l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
I've read that complete multiwan support will be available only with 2.0
version of pfsense, but I'd like to know if You've some suggestion for doing
something similar, also using many pfsense instead
Hi all.
I've read that complete multiwan support will be available only with 2.0
version of pfsense, but I'd like to know if You've some suggestion for doing
something similar, also using many pfsense instead of single one, or something
else.
Thanks and cheers.
Tebano.
22 matches
Mail list logo
