Hello, all-
I switched yesterday from m0n0wall to pfsense, I'm trying to get a feel for
which will work better for my SOHO environment (ADSL WAN, DMZ in use by my
VOIP gateway, under 12 hosts on my LAN).
Here are some bugs that I noticed. I've tried searching the list archives,
couldn't quic
At 10:52 AM 8/26/2005, Bill Plein wrote:
I am getting other issues with "installer". Here is the order of events
1) Boot the latest CD image (pfSense-LiveCD-0.80.iso)
2) Allow it to come up, I assign interfaces, and finally up to the menu
3) run "installer"
4) Partition disk, install
5) Reboot
Tried it again, and it fails in the same manner. I'll do it again,
concentrating on the end of the Freesbie install (I walked away during the
install, and it had rebooted. The 0.71.6 installer asked me more questions
and then warned me to take out the CD.) It appears that maybe the intall is
ab
At 11:47 AM 8/26/2005, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
This wouldn't happen to be a repeat of the "cdrom on the same channel"
issue, is it?
Well, it's a virtual CDROM, but it happens to be on a different channel
(it's the master on channel 1, the hard drive is master on channel 0)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
At 11:53 AM 8/26/2005, Scott Ullrich wrote:
0.71? Thats OLD.
Please download a 0.80 series iso.
No, .71 was the version I just checked, and that ~works~. 0.80 is the one
that failed.
I just retried (after moving the CD to be the slave of the hard drive), and
I found the source of the rebo
It worked this time. Not sure why the last attempt failed.
256MB RAM for the virtual machine
4GB of disk
This time around, the installer didn't error out, didn't reboot, and I got
the intaller asking about boot blocks and then asking me to reboot and
remove the hard drive.
What is strange is
The only LiveCD's that I found on 4 different sites were
"pfSense-LiveCD-0.80.iso", with no minor version appended. After looking at
4 sites, I stopped trying to find any more versions.
According to my System:Firmware:AutoUpdate page:
Category InstalledCurrent
Firmware 0.80 0.6
All-
Today I upgraded my Wrap .84 to .86 via the Mini-Wrap Upgrade file.
My Cisco VPN (software client on my laptop to connect to my office) no
longer connects.
Logs from the pfsense firewall (forwarded to a server via syslog) show that
ISAKMP is being blocked inbound. With PFSense .84, I ne
At 02:28 PM 10/3/2005, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 10/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All-
>
> Today I upgraded my Wrap .84 to .86 via the Mini-Wrap Upgrade file.
>
> My Cisco VPN (software client on my laptop to connect to my office) no
> longer connects.
>
> Logs from the pfsen
PFSense gurus-
I am using MRTG to capture interface statistics of my PFSense firewall. I
have a few questions:
1) I don't see anything interesting on the pflog0 interface. What traffic
should I see on that? I was hoping that I'd see traffic stopped by the
firewall, or at least something usef
At 11:37 AM 10/6/2005, Fleming, John \(ZeroChaos\) wrote:
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=257,4
Thanks. Since I'm not an expert, that should keep me up twiddling with MRTG
for a few nights!
(grin)
Really, thanks, theres a lot of good info there.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Question:
Why do static DHCP leases NOT show up in the DHCP status page?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:00 AM 10/17/2005, John Cianfarani wrote:
In the future if I need more space on the wrap platform I was considering
the same thing.
John
--
From: Bill Plein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 11:39 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Pa
My apologies, this appears to be related to the topic "Traffic Shaping,
killing my DSL link speed to less than 100k"
My 3000/500 line is running 200/20 with my traffic shaping rules enabled (!)
I will turn it off, go back and read that thread in detail.
At 04:33 PM 10/28/2005, Bill Plein wro
At 05:39 PM 10/28/2005, Bill Marquette wrote:
On 10/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My apologies, this appears to be related to the topic "Traffic Shaping,
> killing my DSL link speed to less than 100k"
>
> My 3000/500 line is running 200/20 with my traffic shaping rules
en
At 07:27 PM 10/28/2005, Bill Marquette wrote:
Correct, you will need to reflash, the CF updates are PHP only, they
don't include kernel changes.
May I suggest that there be Release Notes or other convention (numbering?)
that indicate when a kernel change has taken place?
I try to keep up wi
At 11:04 AM 11/2/2005, Vivek Khera wrote:
interesting... i'm looking at the kernel boot messages from a PE
SC430 box (purchased last week) running FreeBSD 5.4 and it is showing
the SATA controller as "generic ATA" and running it at UDMA33 speed.
that doesn't seem 100% right to run at that slow DM
At 11:40 AM 11/2/2005, you wrote:
In one of my previous emails, I mentioned that there are only two options
for the SATA controller. ATA and OFF.
Lynn
My apologies, I didn't catch that.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsub
Rather than seeing more "presets", which is an infinitely long list of
possible games or services we might want to put into the traffic shaper,
might I suggest the following for a future (post 1.0) release (note, these
concepts roll up, each builds on the next)
Aliasing: already in the prod
All-
I've been off the list for a while, my apologies if this has been covered,
searching was fruitless.
I would like to do NAT reflection for UDP, but it appears to not be
working. Is this a bug, a product limitation (can't do it with this
platform), or an enhancement request?
The reason
Scott-
Thanks. That helped.
I found out that my app (game) uses 3 static ports (documentation only
shows 2!) as well as one that is dynamically assigned each time you start
the application. That latter port makes it impossible for me to set up the
UDP reflection, but it's not a big deal, it d
I run pfsense on a wrap platform. I'm aware of the differences in the image
(R/O CF mount, no packages, etc).
I'd like to replace my CF card with a 1GB (or larger) microdrive, and
enable R/W and packages.
This has been discussed many times, and it's well documented in the
archives how to cha
At 12:36 PM 5/10/2006, Frederick Page wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, May 10 2006:
>I'd like to replace my CF card with a 1GB (or larger) microdrive, and
>enable R/W and packages.
Same here. I also like to take advantage of the "PC functionality"
with my Soekris net4801.
My understandi
I'll probably do some testing with my CF setup and if it works, go buy the
microdrive.
Thanks, I appreciate it!
At 03:17 PM 5/10/2006, Bill Marquette wrote:
Update /etc/platform to read pfSense instead of embedded I believe.
--Bill
On 5/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I
At 12:36 PM 5/10/2006, Frederick Page wrote:
Same here. I also like to take advantage of the "PC functionality"
with my Soekris net4801.
I think I might follow the suggestions on this page:
http://www.gizmolabs.org/~ecronin/w/Main/PfSenseFullWRAP
Rather than hack an embedded image to give me
At 01:09 AM 5/11/2006, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:32:27PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll probably do some testing with my CF setup and if it works, go buy the
> microdrive.
Hey Bill, nice to see you here. How much is the microdrive?
How many MByte/s does it?
Yes, I
All-
I am attempting to use a Seagate ST1.2 "Microdrive" (4GB) in my WRAP platform.
I imaged it with the embedded image as a start (I'll play around with
converting it to R/W later). I use the memory card reader on my printer to
write the image, which was a first (my CF/PC card adapter doesn'
At 12:40 PM 5/30/2006, Paul Haddad wrote:
I spent quite a while trying to get this to work on the WRAP platform,
finally gave up and used a regular Flash card. I eventually tried
using the same card to boot a Via mobo with a IDE-Flash adaptor and
got the same result.
I think the Hitachi micro
At 02:02 PM 5/30/2006, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Isn't this in the FAQ/Wiki?
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=FullInstallOnWRAP
I haven't tried this, I don't own a MD.
I may try that as well, later today. That being said, the Wiki article
doesn't describe how to overcome a problem with i
At 05:27 PM 5/30/2006, Bao C. Ha wrote:
I think it is a kernel issue. On Via-based hardware, the CF socket
cannot handle DMA, just PIO, not until the c7-based systemboard
arriving later this year. These high capacity and fast CF will
keep choking on these boards during boot-up.
The WRAP CF car
At 10:00 PM 5/30/2006, Bao C. Ha wrote:
Hi Bill,
You can put the following into /boot/loader.conf
hw.ata.ata_dma="0"
It disables the dma on ata drives. It works on some of the
high speed 100X 2gb CF cards, but not on the Seagate on my
systems. Since mine are VIA-based, so it may be different
fr
At 10:00 PM 5/30/2006, Bao C. Ha wrote:
Hi Bill,
You can put the following into /boot/loader.conf
hw.ata.ata_dma="0"
It disables the dma on ata drives. It works on some of the
high speed 100X 2gb CF cards, but not on the Seagate on my
systems. Since mine are VIA-based, so it may be different
At 10:00 PM 5/30/2006, Bao C. Ha wrote:
Hi Bill,
You can put the following into /boot/loader.conf
hw.ata.ata_dma="0"
It disables the dma on ata drives. It works on some of the
high speed 100X 2gb CF cards, but not on the Seagate on my
systems. Since mine are VIA-based, so it may be different
fr
33 matches
Mail list logo
