Daniel wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:01:52 +1100, Daniel wrote:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:8.0.1) Gecko/2021
Firefox/8.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.5
In previous version (2.4.1 maybe), I thought I had the option under the
Browsers "File" dropdown, to open previously c
"Stan" wrote in message
news:n56dnw7-9_ls90ttnz2dnuvz_q2dn...@mozilla.org...
> Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking we are
> using Firefox?
>
> I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers on
> their list.
>
> Stan
My SeaMonkey 2.5 identif
On 03/12/11 12:08, Desiree wrote:
[...]
You need either User Agent Switcher extension but it only works on Fx [...]
User Agent Switcher 0.7.3, available at AMO, advertises compatibility
with not only Firefox 1.0 to 10.* but also SeaMonkey 1.0 to 2.5.*. It
ought to work also on later versions
Stan wrote:
Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking we
are using Firefox?
I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers on
their list.
It is an outrage that these scumbags should be telling us what browser
to use. If they wrote their code pro
On 12/1/11 2:10 AM, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
>
>
> Daniel wrote:
>
>> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:8.0.1) Gecko/2021
>> Firefox/8.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.5
>> In previous version (2.4.1 maybe), I thought I had the option under the
>> Browsers "File" dropdown,
>> to open previously closed
On 12/3/11 6:46 AM, Dustbin wrote:
> Stan wrote:
>> Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking we
>> are using Firefox?
>>
>> I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers on
>> their list.
>>
>
> It is an outrage that these scumbags should be telling
On 12/3/11 3:08 AM, Desiree wrote:
> "Stan" wrote in message
> news:n56dnw7-9_ls90ttnz2dnuvz_q2dn...@mozilla.org...
>> Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking we are
>> using Firefox?
>>
>> I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers on
>> the
In SM 2.5, The "Recently Closed Windows" item was moved from the "File"
menu to the "Go" menu. -JW
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Dustbin wrote:
Stan wrote:
Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking we
are using Firefox?
I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers on
their list.
It is an outrage that these scumbags should be telling us what browser
to use. If they wrote
On 12/3/11 9:21 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
> Dustbin wrote:
>> Stan wrote:
>>> Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking we
>>> are using Firefox?
>>>
>>> I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers on
>>> their list.
>>>
>>
>> It is an outrage that these s
Dustbin wrote:
Stan wrote:
Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking
we are using Firefox?
I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers
on their list.
It is an outrage that these scumbags should be telling us what
browser to use. If they wrote
Stan wrote:
Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking we
are using Firefox?
I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers on
their list.
Stan
Wow, a lot of info in responses. I have to switch banks and there is
really only one choice within rea
Stan wrote:
Stan wrote:
Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking we
are using Firefox?
I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers on
their list.
Wow, a lot of info in responses. I have to switch banks and there is
really only one choice with
David E. Ross wrote:
>Situations in which an error-free HTML page
>will not be viewable with all browsers include:
>
> * Insufficient contrast between text color and background color.
>
> * [Assumed window sizes]
>
> * Rendering that is garbled when CSS is disabled
>
...a particular favorite of
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>"Scumbag" may be a little strong though,
>
Nope. It's right on the mark.
>as most folks/companies simply aren't aware of standards,
>
aka incompetents. aka don't know how to do their jobs.
>or the existence of browsers beyond, say,
>Internet Exploder, Firefox, and
Ray_Net wrote:
Dustbin wrote:
Stan wrote:
Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking we
are using Firefox?
I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers on
their list.
It is an outrage that these scumbags should be telling us what browser
to us
JeffM wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
"Scumbag" may be a little strong though,
Nope. It's right on the mark.
No, it is not. You can't blame the companies for these problems. It's
the "web developer" companies they contract with who hire kids right out
of school who have no clue what
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/3/11 9:21 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Dustbin wrote:
Stan wrote:
Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking we
are using Firefox?
I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers on
their list.
It is an outrage that these scumba
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Stan wrote:
Stan wrote:
Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking we
are using Firefox?
I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers on
their list.
Wow, a lot of info in responses. I have to switch banks and ther
Stan wrote:
Stan wrote:
Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking
we are using Firefox?
I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers
on their list.
Wow, a lot of info in responses. I have to switch banks and there is
really only one choice wi
JeffM wrote:
as most folks/companies simply aren't aware of standards,
>
aka incompetents. aka don't know how to do their jobs.
I will say there are a few things at play here:
* Big-Wigs in company, and sometimes their own press/PR departments
don't get the web. They get paper/print/etc. me
On 12/3/11 10:42 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Dustbin wrote:
>> Stan wrote:
>>> Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking
>>> we are using Firefox?
>>>
>>> I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers
>>> on their list.
>>
>> It is an outrage
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/3/11 10:42 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Dustbin wrote:
Stan wrote:
Did we ever come up with a sure way of tricking sites into thinking
we are using Firefox?
I need to switch banks and it appears they only accept the browsers
on their list.
It is an outrage t
I don't know if it's me or what happened. I am an old netscape user.
My email has been setup as in Seamonkey for a long time. I notice in
2.5 my setting have changed & I can't seem to find a place to change
this. I had a three way split . On the left side I had my inbox,
out, saved etc. On the
Glenn wrote:
I don't know if it's me or what happened. I am an old netscape
user. My email has been setup as in Seamonkey for a long time. I
notice in 2.5 my setting have changed& I can't seem to find a place
to change this. I had a three way split . On the left side I had my
inbox, out, sav
Glenn:
>I don't know if it's me or what happened. I am an old netscape user.
>My email has been setup as in Seamonkey for a long time. I notice in
>2.5 my setting have changed & I can't seem to find a place to change
>this. I had a three way split . On the left side I had my inbox,
>out, saved
freelance writer
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Interviewed by CNN on 04/12/2011 01:11, Glenn told the world:
> I don't know if it's me or what happened. I am an old netscape user.
> My email has been setup as in Seamonkey for a long time. I notice in
> 2.5 my setting have changed & I can't seem to find a place to change
> this. I had a three
28 matches
Mail list logo
