Henrik37 wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Henrik37 wrote:
...
I would like to recover my 'collected addresses' (which I think is the
address book) but I don't know what that file(s) named.
No, "collected addresses" is not /the/ address book. It's /an/ address
book that contains email name/ad
Henrik37 composed on 2016-12-09 16:58 (UTC-0500):
I would like to recover my 'collected addresses' (which I think is the
address book) but I don't know what that file(s) named. Looking at the
new SM 2.4 installation file listing, it would appear that the address
files are shared by all of the e
Mr. Ed wrote:
On 12/07/16 3:32 PM, Mason83 wrote:
On 07/12/2016 21:16, Mr. Ed wrote:
On 11/20/16 2:44 PM, Mason83 wrote:
1) I was using the StartPage search engine for searches done directly
in the location bar. It now goes to duckduckgo.
That also happens in SM 2.47 (64 bit). Build ident
sean wrote:
> As I continue setting up access to my 12 e'mail accounts via Seamonkey
> 2.49a2, I want to express my thanks and gratitude to all the
> developers who spend their free time helping to keep Seamonkey moving
> ahead...
>
> I've loved Seamonkey for a very long time, ever so grateful to s
Ralph Fox wrote:
Even if the recipient does have Wingdings, the recipient can still see
a "J" like the OP did.
* The Unicode value for "J" is 74 (U+004A).
* But the Wingdings font's smiley face has a different _Unicode_ value
61514 (U+F04A) in the Wingdings font's cmap.
A program us
Richmond wrote:
"Paul B. Gallagher" writes:
True enough. But there are hundreds of sites where you can download
and install Wingdings for free. It's not hard. And given the
prevalence of Windows and the popularity of Wingdings, it's a
reasonable thing for an end user to do.
When you say "fo
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 17:56:59 -0500, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>
>> You cannot do that if you don't have the Microsoft Wingdings font
>> (because you aren't using Microsoft).
The OP is running Windows 7. It is highly likely that the OP does have
the Wingdings font installed.
>
"Paul B. Gallagher" writes:
> True enough. But there are hundreds of sites where you can download
> and install Wingdings for free. It's not hard. And given the
> prevalence of Windows and the popularity of Wingdings, it's a
> reasonable thing for an end user to do.
>
When you say "for free" do
Richmond wrote:
"Paul B. Gallagher" writes:
In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender specifies the
font Wingdings and sends the character "J," SeaMonkey should do as
it's told and display the Wingdings glyph for that character point.
That wouldn't be a violation, would it?
You cann
Henrik37 wrote:
I am in the process of rebuilding my SM mail system on a new PC after an
unexpected major failure of an old PC. The failed PC ran SM 2.39. The
new PC has SM 2.40 installed but is not yet in use.
Using the command prompt, I have managed to copy the 'inbox' and 'sent'
files for
"Paul B. Gallagher" writes:
>
> In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender specifies the font
> Wingdings and sends the character "J," SeaMonkey should do as it's
> told and display the Wingdings glyph for that character point. That
> wouldn't be a violation, would it?
>
You cannot do tha
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 09-12-16 22:16:
David E. Ross wrote:
It would be definitely wrong -- a major deviation from the commitment
to adhere to standards -- for any Mozilla-based application to
render 0x004A as anything other than J.
In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender specif
On 09/12/2016 20:10, EE wrote:
> If I search in my URL bar, I get whatever engine is selected in the
> searchbar.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1265881
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists
On 09/12/2016 20:57, John Duncan wrote:
> Mason83 wrote:
>
>> It is likely that the original author has stopped working on that
>> add-on. However, someone else picked up the ball:
>>
>> https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26256#c2
>> https://bitbucket.org/stanio/mnenhy/downloads
>>
>> Her
I am in the process of rebuilding my SM mail system on a new PC after an
unexpected major failure of an old PC. The failed PC ran SM 2.39. The
new PC has SM 2.40 installed but is not yet in use.
Using the command prompt, I have managed to copy the 'inbox' and 'sent'
files for all six of my e
David E. Ross wrote:
It would be definitely wrong -- a major deviation from the commitment
to adhere to standards -- for any Mozilla-based application to
render 0x004A as anything other than J.
In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender specifies the font
Wingdings and sends the charac
On 12/9/2016 7:50 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
> Richmond wrote on 09-12-16 11:03:
>> "David E. Ross" writes:
>>
>>> I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent
>>> messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is
>> But while we are waiting for the ideal world, w
Mason83 wrote:
On 22/11/2016 15:54, TCW wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:08:09 +0100, Mason83 wrote:
On 20/11/2016 20:50, Mason83 wrote:
On 20/11/2016 20:47, Mason83 wrote:
On 20/11/2016 20:44, Mason83 wrote:
2) When I display an email or NG message, the header pane was empty.
Removing the M
Mason83 wrote:
On 08/12/2016 20:11, EE wrote:
Mr. Ed wrote:
On 12/07/16 3:32 PM, Mason83 wrote:
On 07/12/2016 21:16, Mr. Ed wrote:
On 11/20/16 2:44 PM, Mason83 wrote:
1) I was using the StartPage search engine for searches done directly
in the location bar. It now goes to duckduckgo.
Tha
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/8/2016 10:57 AM, EE wrote:
Is there ever going to be a new candidate for Mac OS? The current
candidate dated Oct. 5 caused a problem with a website I visit frequently.
Stick with the existing, official, end-user version 2.40. Anything
beyond that is either still
Ray_Net writes:
> Richmond wrote on 09-12-16 11:03:
>> "David E. Ross" writes:
>>
>>> I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent
>>> messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is
>> But while we are waiting for the ideal world, we have to be
>> pra
If a release candidate works it will not be much different from the
official build. Just back up your profile and try it out. 2.46 is miles
ahead of 2.40. Any errors you see in a candidate will be in the final
build and the sooner they are reported the sooner they are fixed.
FRG
David E. Ros
On 09/12/2016 15:31, David H. Durgee wrote:
> Mason83 wrote:
>
>> One thing to watch out for is when Ubuntuzilla eventually
>> puts out a new release. This is likely to overwrite your
>> "custom" SM package. I don't have a good solution for that.
>
> Interesting you should mention that. When I sw
Richmond wrote on 09-12-16 11:03:
"David E. Ross" writes:
I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent
messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is
But while we are waiting for the ideal world, we have to be
pragmatic. Senders with MS Office don'
Mason83 wrote:
On 09/12/2016 02:17, David H. Durgee wrote:
Mason83 wrote:
On 07/12/2016 23:12, David H. Durgee wrote:
Mason83 wrote:
On 06/12/2016 15:01, David H. Durgee wrote:
I am currently running 2.40 x64 on linux mint x64 installed from the
ubuntuzilla repository. I have a local repos
On 9/12/2016 6:37 AM, Mason83 wrote:
On 08/12/2016 13:09, TCW wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:14:55 +0800, Edmund Wong wrote:
Hi,
Fwiw.. please *do* note that those 2.46 candidate builds are just
test builds. While it does have the sec fix, it isn't the official
candidate until I start spinning
Ant writes:
> Thanks, but it didn't work for me. I tried
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/smiley-fixer/versions/ and
> force an install with its reboot. It didn't work. :( Did it work for anyone
> else in SM v2.40?
It seems to work for me with Aurora, I have not yet tried 2.40.
"David E. Ross" writes:
>
> I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent
> messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is
But while we are waiting for the ideal world, we have to be
pragmatic. Senders with MS Office don't know what they are doing
typi
Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> writes:
> You must set the font for the J or L to be Wingdings, which means the
> message may need to be HTML.
> My SM doesn't let me select Wingdings in the HTML compose window.
> But I can insert the required HTML code using "Insert >> HTML...".
>
> HTML code
On 09/12/2016 08:21, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> Plugin support is discontined in Gecko / Firefox 52 which is the base of
> SeaMonkey. This was alrweady the case with 64 bit Windows versions for
> some time. Only Flash will work. All other plugings will no longer work.
> Nothing we / SeaMonkey d
30 matches
Mail list logo