Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Le 26/12/2016 à 06:09, Jonathan N. Little a écrit : bern...@nospam.com wrote: Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 works perfect. Any ideas? Same here, message script not responding after a long

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Likely a corrupt profile. Check if bug 1305624 applies: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1305624 Did you use a version higher than 2.46 with this profile in the past? You can delete the storage directory in you profile and see if the error goes away. Usually its non essential but b

Re: SM 2.46 vs 2.50a1 nightly on OS X

The bug which tracks the underlying SeaMonkey changes is: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323494 All themes likely might need some changes too. FRG John Duncan wrote: John Duncan wrote: http://i.imgur.com/emcJad6.png Okay, so both the webaudio and add-on install popup weirdnes

SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)

Hello, I have problem with PDF pages in Seamonkey 2.46: They are not more displayed, I end with a grey page. In the preference ==> navigator ==> application the only available option is "download file". I added an external application (okular) to display the PDF files but I prefer to have th

New Javascript Free Tab?

I had an idea for a useful addition to seamonkey. An option to create a new javascript free tab. This would mean the javascript on/off flag would need to be per tab. I am aware of noscript, but it doesn't work the same way. Some tasks, like reading the news, don't need javascript and are better wi

Re: SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)

Plugings were blacklisted in recent x64 versions of Firefox and SeaMonkey. You can try the i686 version. I am quite sure you are using a i686 Firefox or it wouldn't work there too. Or it uses pdf.js the internal pdf viewer there? Only Flash and one or two others are whitelisted for now. All plu

Re: SM 2.46 eMail Loss

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: The mails should still be there. Maybe only the account got corrupted. Is sending and receiving still working? If yes might just be a corrupted msf file but not very familiar with the mail component. http://kb.mozillazine.org/Mozilla_Suite_:_Issues_:_Email FRG Samuel

Re: SM 2.46 eMail Loss

The msf files are only the index files. The real data is in files without an extension like Send. They are under Mail and ImapMail in my profile. Have not set up pop3 in this. FRG bo1953 wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: The mails should still be there. Maybe only the account got corrupted. I

Re: SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)

Thanks, I checked Firefox and its is the X86-64 version "Architecture :x86_64 Package source : MozillaFirefox-50.1.0-1.1 Media No. :1" You are right that the Kpart plugins is not activated in Firefox. I didn't found in the plugins or extension of Firefox anything related to pdf.js. Maybe this

Re: New Javascript Free Tab?

On 26/12/2016 12:25, Richmond wrote: > I had an idea for a useful addition to seamonkey. An option to create a > new javascript free tab. This would mean the javascript on/off flag > would need to be per tab. > > I am aware of noscript, but it doesn't work the same way. Some tasks, > like reading

Re: SM 2.46 eMail Loss

On 24/12/2016 14:09, SamuelS wrote: > Hello all, > > I updated to 2.46 from 2.40 on my Laptop using Win Business Vista 2, I > Am not able to retrieve/see over 18 months of email for only one account. > > I have reverted to SM 2.40 and still not able to find the messages... > > Is this lost for

Re: Rendering engines Servo vs Gecko

On 25/12/2016 06:00, Paul Bergsagel wrote: > Does anyone know if the new Mozilla Servo rendering engine will be > replacing the Gecko rendering engine in SeaMonkey? Maybe they discuss that in their blog? https://blog.servo.org/ ___ support-seamonkey m

Re: SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)

On 12/26/2016 3:13 AM, pconde wrote: > Hello, > > I have problem with PDF pages in Seamonkey 2.46: They are not more > displayed, I end with a grey page. In the preference ==> navigator ==> > application the only available option is "download file". I added an > external application (okular) t

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Le 26/12/2016 à 11:53, Frank-Rainer Grahl a écrit : Did you use a version higher than 2.46 with this profile in the past? thank you for your reply, I went recently (in October) from 2.26.1 to 2.40 and that's all -- cyberzen ___ support-seamonkey mail

Re: New Javascript Free Tab?

On 12/26/2016 3:25 AM, Richmond wrote: > I had an idea for a useful addition to seamonkey. An option to create a > new javascript free tab. This would mean the javascript on/off flag > would need to be per tab. > > I am aware of noscript, but it doesn't work the same way. Some tasks, > like readin

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

David E. Ross wrote: > On 12/25/2016 6:08 PM, bern...@nospam.com wrote: >> Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my >> password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 >> works perfect. Any ideas? >> > > Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows

Re: 2.46 data manager not working UPDATE

Jonathan N. Little wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 12/25/2016 6:08 PM, bern...@nospam.com wrote: >>> Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my >>> password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 >>> works perfect. Any ideas? >>> >> >> Windows 7 U

Re: SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)

Le 26/12/2016 à 17:13, David E. Ross a écrit : I suggest you install the PDF Viewer extension from . Mozilla plans to block ALL plug-ins other than Flash. This extension in inherent in the "vanilla" version of Firefox and is likely to be

Re: New Javascript Free Tab?

Richmond wrote: I had an idea for a useful addition to seamonkey. An option to create a new javascript free tab. This would mean the javascript on/off flag would need to be per tab. I am aware of noscript, but it doesn't work the same way. Some tasks, like reading the news, don't need javascript

Linux 64 bit version

I've downloaded the 64 bit Linux version for my Ubuntu machine. I picked up the current 2.46 .tar.bz2 file. When I untar it and run it, Help->About still reports that it's 2.39. Is this really 2.46, but with the internal version number unchanged from 2.39? Since Ubuntu doesn't install the 6

Re: 2.46 data manager not working UPDATE

Good. There is maybe a lot of junk in permissions.sqlite. If you know what you are doing you can clean it out with an sqlite editor like SQLiteStudio when SeaMonkey is not running. Also check the * global domain for junk. You can also try the old cookie viewer to check the allowed cookie domai

Re: Linux 64 bit version

> When I untar it and run it, Help->About still reports that it's 2.39. Is this > really 2.46, but with the internal version number unchanged from 2.39? No. Either you have 2.39 still running or 2.39 is started instead of 2.46. Gordon Weast wrote: I've downloaded the 64 bit Linux version for my

Re: 2.46 data manager not working UPDATE

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Good. There is maybe a lot of junk in permissions.sqlite. If you know > what you are doing you can clean it out with an sqlite editor like > SQLiteStudio when SeaMonkey is not running. permissions.sqlite just seems to be two table definitions but no records. I have DB B

Re: (Mac 10.6-10.8 )Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Paul Bergsagel wrote: Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hello, I contributed some additional release notes here Please feel free to comment, correct, add information, ... CU Rainer Rainer I j

Can't install SM 2.46 on a WinXP SP3 system

I am running a WinXP SP3 system and am using SM 2.40. When I tried to update to 2.46, my SM became corrupted and would not start. I just downloaded the complete SM 2.46 but now not only would it not install, the installer indicated I needed at least a WinXP SP2 system. This is a major bug in t

Re: Can't install SM 2.46 on a WinXP SP3 system

What's your processor? Does it support SSE2? Robert Gault wrote: I am running a WinXP SP3 system and am using SM 2.40. When I tried to update to 2.46, my SM became corrupted and would not start. I just downloaded the complete SM 2.46 but now not only would it not install, the installer indicat

Re: SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)

On 12/26/2016 9:29 AM, cyberzen wrote: > Le 26/12/2016 à 17:13, David E. Ross a écrit : >> I suggest you install the PDF Viewer extension from >> . Mozilla >> plans to block ALL plug-ins other than Flash. This extension in >> inherent in th

Re: New Javascript Free Tab?

On 12/26/2016 10:17 AM, EE wrote: > Richmond wrote: >> I had an idea for a useful addition to seamonkey. An option to create a >> new javascript free tab. This would mean the javascript on/off flag >> would need to be per tab. >> >> I am aware of noscript, but it doesn't work the same way. Some tas

Re: 2.46 data manager not working UPDATE

On 12/26/2016 10:43 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Good. There is maybe a lot of junk in permissions.sqlite. If you know what > you > are doing you can clean it out with an sqlite editor like SQLiteStudio when > SeaMonkey is not running. > > Also check the * global domain for junk. > > You ca

Re: New Javascript Free Tab?

"David E. Ross" writes: > > 1. Install the PrefBar extension from > . > > 2. On the PrefBar tool bar, right-click and select Customize PrefBar. > > 3. In the left pane (Available Items) of the PrefBar window, locate > Javascript (Tab).

Re: Linux 64 bit version

Gordon Weast writes: > I've downloaded the 64 bit Linux version for my Ubuntu machine. > > I picked up the current 2.46 .tar.bz2 file. > > When I untar it and run it, Help->About still reports that it's 2.39. > Is this really 2.46, but with the internal version number unchanged > from 2.39? > > S

Re: Can't install SM 2.46 on a WinXP SP3 system

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: What's your processor? Does it support SSE2? Robert Gault wrote: I am running a WinXP SP3 system and am using SM 2.40. When I tried to update to 2.46, my SM became corrupted and would not start. I just downloaded the complete SM 2.46 but now not only would it not insta

Re: Can't install SM 2.46 on a WinXP SP3 system

> The CPU is an AMD Athlon XP 2500+. I believe it does not support SSE2. Yes that's right sorry. You can't use 2.46 Windows on this system. The Linux version still works. 2.49 and up should give you the correct message when you try to install it. The change came too late for 2.46. FRG Robert

Re: SM 2.46 eMail Loss

SamuelS wrote: > Mason83 wrote: >> On 24/12/2016 14:09, SamuelS wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I updated to 2.46 from 2.40 on my Laptop using Win Business Vista 2, I >>> Am not able to retrieve/see over 18 months of email for only one >>> account. >>> >>> I have reverted to SM 2.40 and still not

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Le 26/12/2016 à 17:18, cyberzen a écrit : Le 26/12/2016 à 11:53, Frank-Rainer Grahl a écrit : Did you use a version higher than 2.46 with this profile in the past? thank you for your reply, I went recently (in October) from 2.26.1 to 2.40 and that's all I have another XP SP3 PC that was mig

Re: SM 2.46 eMail Loss

On 26/12/2016 20:41, SamuelS wrote: > Mason83 wrote: >> On 24/12/2016 14:09, SamuelS wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I updated to 2.46 from 2.40 on my Laptop using Win Business Vista 2, I >>> Am not able to retrieve/see over 18 months of email for only one account. >>> >>> I have reverted to SM 2.

Re: SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)

pconde wrote: Thanks, I checked Firefox and its is the X86-64 version "Architecture :x86_64 Package source : MozillaFirefox-50.1.0-1.1 Media No. :1" You are right that the Kpart plugins is not activated in Firefox. I didn't found in the plugins or extension of Firefox anything related to pdf

Re: SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)

On 12/26/2016 06:37 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Only Flash and one or two others are whitelisted for now. All plugins but Flash will go away in 2.50+ and Firefox 53. Well THAT'S gonna suck big time, seeing as how my company's payroll site is a Java applet... -- Jaime A. Cruz President N

Re: SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)

On 12/26/2016 09:05 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: On 12/26/2016 06:37 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Only Flash and one or two others are whitelisted for now. All plugins but Flash will go away in 2.50+ and Firefox 53. Well THAT'S gonna suck big time, seeing as how my company's payroll site is a J