Ray_Net wrote:
Lemuel Johnson wrote on 8/11/2020 5:33 PM:
I have a free ZOOM account. I hosted a meeting last Friday with no
problems.
I have tried to participate on a zoom meeting and the result is the same
- I was obliged to use Google Chrome.
I've never had any trouble using Zoom.
Ray_Net wrote:
Lemuel Johnson wrote on 8/11/2020 5:33 PM:
I have a free ZOOM account. I hosted a meeting last Friday with no
problems.
I have tried to participate on a zoom meeting and the result is the same
- I was obliged to use Google Chrome.
I've never had any trouble using Zoom.
Ant wrote on 8/11/2020 11:40 PM:
On 8/11/2020 2:20 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
...
It's strange that you said that jit.si have a problem ... because
jit.si works very welle whan I access it using Google Chrome.
Yes and it worked with 2.49 and it failed with 2.53. There is a bug
open. Might
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 8/11/2020 11:20 PM:
Ray_Net wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 8/11/2020 6:22 PM:
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
On 8/11/2020 4:25 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
I had problem with ZOOM ... so I test it with two other free sites
(because a ZOOM meeting must be opened by someone
Ant wrote on 8/11/2020 11:40 PM:
On 8/11/2020 1:59 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
...
I have tried to participate on a zoom meeting and the result is the
same - I was obliged to use Google Chrome.
Why not Firefox?
Firefox is not installed on my pc. and I have another way also:
Using Microsoft Edge
On 8/11/2020 2:20 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
...
It's strange that you said that jit.si have a problem ... because
jit.si works very welle whan I access it using Google Chrome.
Yes and it worked with 2.49 and it failed with 2.53. There is a bug
open. Might even work now again. I put a lot
On 8/11/2020 1:59 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
...
I have tried to participate on a zoom meeting and the result is the same
- I was obliged to use Google Chrome.
Why not Firefox?
--
Life's so loco! ..!.. *isms, sins, hates, (d)evil, illnesses (e.g.,
COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2), deaths (RIP),
Ray_Net wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 8/11/2020 6:22 PM:
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
On 8/11/2020 4:25 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
I had problem with ZOOM ... so I test it with two other free sites
(because a ZOOM meeting must be opened by someone paying for the use of it)
I was in SM 2.49.1 and I
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 8/11/2020 6:22 PM:
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
On 8/11/2020 4:25 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
I had problem with ZOOM ... so I test it with two other free sites
(because a ZOOM meeting must be opened by someone paying for the use
of it)
I was in SM 2.49.1 and I expected that
Lemuel Johnson wrote on 8/11/2020 5:33 PM:
On 8/11/2020 4:25 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
I had problem with ZOOM ... so I test it with two other free sites
(because a ZOOM meeting must be opened by someone paying for the use
of it)
I was in SM 2.49.1 and I expected that this problem will be resolved
Bill Spikowski wrote:
I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7
computers.
The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I
see that SM has regressed to version 2.49.5. This has happened twice
each on two different Win10 computers. I've
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Bill Spikowski wrote:
I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7
computers.
The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I see that
SM has regressed to version 2.49.5. This has happened twice each on two
different
Bill Spikowski wrote:
I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7
computers.
The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I
see that SM has regressed to version 2.49.5. This has happened twice
each on two different Win10 computers. I've
I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7
computers.
The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I see that
SM has regressed to version 2.49.5. This has happened twice each on two
different Win10 computers. I've looked at the various
Classic uses the theme from the toolkit Gecko backend and just builds on it.
Modern provides almost everything itself.
So might be faster but also breaks easier. if something in the backed is
changed. Mihgt also no not as "sophisticated".
FRG
Edward wrote:
On 8/11/20 5:05 AM, Daniel wrote:
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
On 8/11/2020 4:25 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
I had problem with ZOOM ... so I test it with two other free sites (because
a ZOOM meeting must be opened by someone paying for the use of it)
I was in SM 2.49.1 and I expected that this problem will be resolved with
the latest
On 8/11/20 5:05 AM, Daniel wrote:
Edward, when you think "SeaMonkey performs a lot faster, the speed
difference is noticeable", is this just for those sites that you were
previously at so their information is all in your cache making SM "seem"
to display the information quicker or are
On 8/11/2020 4:25 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
I had problem with ZOOM ... so I test it with two other free sites
(because a ZOOM meeting must be opened by someone paying for the use of it)
I was in SM 2.49.1 and I expected that this problem will be resolved
with the latest 2.53.3 - NO - NOT SOLVED - SM
I had problem with ZOOM ... so I test it with two other free sites
(because a ZOOM meeting must be opened by someone paying for the use of it)
I was in SM 2.49.1 and I expected that this problem will be resolved
with the latest 2.53.3 - NO - NOT SOLVED - SM is UNUSABLE ...
Those are my latest
Edward wrote on 10/08/2020 4:39 AM:
I am running SeaMonkey on Fedora Linux, using the Fedora-supplied package.
Are there are any known differences, other than appearance, between the
SeaMonkey Modern and Default themes?
I have noticed when using the Default theme, SeaMonkey tends to run
20 matches
Mail list logo
