Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.7.
This isn't going to be a quick canned notification as there is
significance in this post.
What's so significant?
This could be my last "New release" post here on the newsgroups
(well, unless we release some
Dear All,
If you're not aware by now, please let me state that both the Mailing
Lists and Newsgroups will be decommissioned soon (Early April).
Why?
===
Why indeed. Tbh, I don't know why. I would believe it's related
to the overhead of maintenance and such; but whatever the
reasons are, it's a
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.7b1.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
PS: Yeah, somewhat a canned message. Currently in the middle of a bunch
of things while doing release, so my apologies.
Links:
[1] - http:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.6.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
PS: Yeah, somewhat a canned message. Currently in the middle of a bunch
of things while doing release, so my apologies.
Links:
[1] - http://
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.6b1.
So please check out [1] or [2] for what is changed from 2.53.6b1.
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
Links:
[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.6
[2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/rele
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
> Edmund Wong wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I hope all is well with everyone.
>>
>> I've been spending a lot of time working on the update system. When I
>> started this project some time ago, I had just wanted to use
Edmund Wong wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a quick specific mention for version 2.49.5.
>
> There are no updates to this version. There are updates to 2.49.4.
> Just none to 2.49.5. Users hoping to update to this
> version will need to update manually.
Further to my post,
Hi All,
This is a quick specific mention for version 2.49.5.
There are no updates to this version. There are updates to 2.49.4.
Just none to 2.49.5. Users hoping to update to this
version will need to update manually.
Why?
Because 2.49.5 was a difficult version (at least for me) to release
as
Hi All,
I hope all is well with everyone.
I've been spending a lot of time working on the update system. When I
started this project some time ago, I had just wanted to use the
old system and update (pun not intended)it. Gave up that idea and went
for something else.
Now fast forward a few ye
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.5.1.
So please check out [1] or [2] for what is changed from 2.53.5.
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
Links:
[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.5.1
[2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/relea
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.5. While it was actually released on the 14th, I've only
gotten the chance of posting this today. My apologies.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Further to note that due to some issues(I would believe bugs, th
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.5 Beta 1.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
Links:
[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.5b1
[2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.53.5/
_
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.4 final.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I
am *still* working on it.
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
Links:
[1] - http://www.seamonkey-pro
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.4 Beta 4.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I
am *still* working on it.
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
Links:
[1] - http://www.seamonkey-pr
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.3.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I
am *still* working on it.
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
Links:
[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.o
Henrik37 wrote:
> Since about the time I installed SM2.52 on my wife's PC, the Windows
> Explorer no longer behaves as it used to.
As far as I know, SeaMonkey doesn't fiddle with Windows Explorer or
any of its settings.
>
> Could the problem be caused by a recent installation of Edge or
> someth
Edmund Wong wrote:
> Greetings,
Before anyone wonders, no this wasn't an updated post.
Three possible reasons (well.. there a lot of 'possible' reasons... just
one particular true one):
1) I had posted "SeaMonkey 2.53.3 Beta 1 released, but made a mistake so
I followed
Is it just me or was my original SeaMonkey 2.53.2 released post deleted?
Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.3 Beta 1.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I
am *still* working on it.
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
Links:
[1] - http://www.seamonkey-pr
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.2.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I
am working on it.
Edmund
Links:
[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.2
[2] - http://
BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If I remember, 2.53.2 should be built on FreeBSD. But where are sources
> ? Link provided on https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.2b1
> (https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.53.2b1/source/seamonkey-2.53.2b1.source.tar.xz)
> r
BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If I remember, 2.53.2 should be built on FreeBSD. But where are sources
> ? Link provided on https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.2b1
> (https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.53.2b1/source/seamonkey-2.53.2b1.source.tar.xz)
> r
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.2 Beta 1.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I
am working on it.
Thanks to all involved. Namely kudos to IanN and FRG for their hard
working
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.2 Beta 1.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I
am working on it.
Thanks to all involved. Namely kudos to IanN and FRG for their hard
working
In my rush, I had missed the fact that the website changes haven't
been pushed. So naturally, if you get a 404 on any of the links...
you know who to blame.. oh ..look, the clouds are so beautiful... ;P
(My apologies..)
Edmund
Edmund Wong wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The SeaMon
*sheepish grin while pondering on this predictament*
Um.. erm..
Did I mention that you've got a smashing shirt on?
No? You have a smashing shirt on!
In all seriousnessity (yeah..no such word..), I jumped the
gun. I should've pushed the website updates and WAITED
for the website to update BEFO
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.1!
So please check out [1] or [2].
Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately.
Thanks to all involved,
Edmund
NB: Personal note, I've never understood the concept of the
archive.mozi
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.1b1! It's the first beta in the 2.53 series.
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.53.1b1, see the
What's New in SeaMonkey 2.53.1b1 section of the Release Notes [2], which
also contain a list of kn
Gunther Nikl wrote:
>> I'm not sure. Will need to ping someone at Mozilla as the blog is
>> hosted by Mozilla (for now).
>
> Thank you for considering my inquiry. Its not that important, but still
> would
> be nice. However, if the blog is hosted by Mozilla then I am sceptical that
> they are in
Gunther Nikl wrote:
> Edmund Wong wrote:
>>>> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/12/19/updating-everyone/
>
> (Slightly) OT but is it possible to offer the blog also with TLSv1 using
> ECC ciphers (ecdhe_ecdsa_aes)? The main site of seamonkey-project.org is
Daniel wrote:
> Ant wrote on 19/12/2018 12:13 PM:
>> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/12/19/updating-everyone/
>
> Thanks for the link, Ant.
>
> And EWong and Co, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you for all your past
> efforts.
>
> As Alex said on the blog ...
> Quote
> I keep hope for this p
Mort Linder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I click onto SeaMonkey, my Windows 7 laptop cannot find it. Yet,
> when I type an URL into the upper toolbar,it works.
>
> What is happening?
>
Short form:
I happened. I goofed. I fixed.
Long Form:
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/09/12/website-is-up-
Ant wrote:
> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/09/11/end-of-an-era/
>
> Can't wait to see the future of SeaMonkey. I wonder if this means no
> more minor v2.49.x releases with security fixes. :(
No, it just means that we'll release the v2.49.x when we get
this mess cleared up. And by "mess
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.49.4!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.49.4, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.49.4 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
ques
Ant wrote:
> On 5/15/2018 3:46 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>> > I say on your May 14th Seamonkey Meeting Notes that Seamonkey
>> Composer may be discontinued?
>>
>> Where did you see this? I wrote the notes and this is not mentioned
>> anywhere.
>>
>> > There was an enquiry by Mozilla if the Co
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.49.3!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.49.3, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.49.3 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
ques
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
>
> Is this kind of hanging/freezing/slowdown a known thing? Is there a
> bugzilla bug (or bugs) that cover this issue? Is there anything that can
> be done to mitigate or work around the issue? Could one of my plugins (I
> use Addblock, ChatZilla, DOM Inspector, Geolocater,
NoOp wrote:
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2018-08/
> Out of bounds memory write while processing Vorbis audio data
> ANNOUNCED
> March 16, 2018
> IMPACT
> CRITICAL
> PRODUCTS
> Firefox, Firefox ESR
> FIXED IN
> Firefox 59.0.1
> Firefox ESR 52.7.2
>
> Also see:
> https://w
Dirk Munk wrote:
>
> I really wish the developers would start producing official 64 bit
> versions of Seamonkey. How many people are still using a 32 bit version
> of Windows? Since Windows 7, 64 bit has become the standard Windows
> version, older Windows versions are becoming obsolete now. I wou
Dirk Munk wrote:
> Edmund Wong wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> After a not so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey
>> Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.49.2!
>>
>> So please check out [1] or [2].
>>
>> Up
Greetings,
After a not so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey
Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.49.2!
So please check out [1] or [2].
Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately.
Thanks to all involved,
Edmund
Links:
[1] - http:/
Luis Carlos González Moráles wrote:
> If web addons have to be implemented, could that veresion be SeaMonkey 3?
If you mean WebExtensions as a SeaMonkey 3.0, that is definitely
a possibility.
> The 2.x versions have like 9 or so years that are developed:
> I'm a blind user, so advanced things to
Daniel wrote:
> Ant wrote:
>> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/06/quick-update/ and
>> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/05/next-release-is-2-49-2-and/
>
> Humm!! Should we be worried that Ewong twice mentions "touch wood"?!? ;-P
>
Well... I'm always a skeptic when it comes to
rickman wrote:
> Nothing for Android? I'm looking for a newreader for a tablet.
>
As much as we like to have support for multiple operating systems
(including Android and iOS), unfortunately, we don't have the
resources to add support for Android and/or iOS.
Perhaps we may one day support Andro
Ant wrote:
> Well almost!
>
> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2017/11/04/2-49-1-is-out/
> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2017/11/04/404-error/
>
> Maybe more in https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/ soon.
I am waiting for some response regarding the external
infrastructure and see if it's
Hi all,
Was reading mozilla.support.seamonkey and thought to myself,
"geez.. there's certainly a lot of spam.. where's the moderation.."
That's when my internal voice trailed off and said... 'oh'.
So this is a heads-up. If you see an influx of old messages you
can blame it on me. (or the
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> It is probably bug 1286613:
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1286613
>
> Solution is unfortunately to go back to 2.46 and wait for 2.49.1. Not
> sure if we can backport all the parts to 2.48 and do a 2.48.1
It is worth doing that if it fixes problems.
marksatt...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> Just updated to 2.48 a few minutes ago. Now I cannot contact my router at
> 192.168.11 anymore. I get a red error screen saying...401 Authorization
> Required
> This server could not verify that you are authorized to access. Either you
> supplied the wron
wwel...@gmail.com wrote:
> I've had problems all day with opening SM 2.48. It took me literally most of
> the day to figure out what the solution was.
>
> I have a MAC macOS Sierra 10.12.6 and it appears as if SM 2.48 isn't
> compatible with the Mac OS I am on.
I'm not familiar with OSX; but, w
Hi Everyone,
Just wanna mention that I've generated the very first set of
Win64 builds.
I've set up a schedule to generate both 32 and 64 bit nightlies.
But while it's building 2.53, Win64 isn't officially 'contributed'
until (tentatively) 2.54 (which gives us some time to figure the quirks
of W
Greetings,
After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey
Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.48!
So please check out [1] or [2].
This release would not be possible without the help from a lot
of people; but the person I'd like to thank personally is
Nick Thom
EE wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed that Adrian Kalla's British English language
> pack for SM 2.48 does not work? No idea about any other of the language
> packs, but that one did not work with his or Mozilla's build of SM 2.48.
l10n repacks have always been a pita to figure out.
Can you clarif
l.thames wrote:
> Unable to send E-mail because "not in form user a host" How do I correct?
I'm guessing you're entering an invalid email address.
Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/l
P. H. Madore wrote:
> This is a new issue for me. I was using 2.40 until today. Now I can't use
> anything. Something about "old-configure." Here is the complete
> configuration log:
>
How are you building 2.46?
Furthermore, what's the contents of:
/home/phm/Downloads/seamonkey-2.46.source/seam
Larry S. wrote:
> My wife has SM 2.46 on a Dell laptop using Windows 10. Yesterday it
> worked just fine. Today it won't start. No mail, no browser, nothing.
> Her other programs work perfectly.
>
> She has restarted the computer at least three times. She checked on task
> manager--one time it sho
David C. Mores wrote:
> I am trying to login on my Cisco/Linksys WRT120N home router admin page
> at http://192.168.0.1/ using seamonkey. I get a pop up window prompting
> for 'A username and password are being requested by http://192.168.0.1.
> The site says: "WRT120N"' Clicking the OK button af
Ken Rudolph wrote:
> 1) POP e-mail not updating
> 2) password manager crashes program
>
> I need to go back to 2.40 and have downloaded it. How can I make sure
> that it will use my profile, and how can I stop it from updating to 2.46
> automatically. Help!
>
Hi Ken,
Can you clarify what ope
NoOp wrote:
> Edmund,
>
> Why is it necessary to reboot the computer when the Windows version is
> installed?
>
> G
>
You shouldn't need to reboot.
Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.or
Ant wrote:
> On 12/23/2016 12:59 AM, Philipp van Hüllen wrote:
>> Edmund Wong schrieb:
>>> Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!!
>>
>>
>> Working fine so far here (including update):
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0
John Duncan wrote:
> Edmund Wong wrote:
>> Pat Connors wrote:
>>> In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using
>>> 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is
>>> available for download, should I use it or stay
Hi All,
(this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and
no one else).
While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's
prudent that I post this here.
SeaMonkey 2.46 took it's not-so-sweet time in being released due to a
plethora of issues (I am so damn
David E. Ross wrote:
> On 12/22/2016 2:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote:
>> Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!!
>>
>> Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'...
>> man.. little DID I know.
>>
Pat Connors wrote:
> In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using
> 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is
> available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version?
Breach? What breach?
Edmund
___
Ant wrote:
> Really? How will users know there are updates then? Will they at least
> tell them to go to the official web site?
>
>
> On 12/22/2016 1:47 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>> Just grab the full installer from the website. Update will likely not
>> work for any Windows OS in this releas
Edmund Wong wrote:
> Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!!
>
> Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'...
> man.. little DID I know.
>
> Erm.. oh wait. the formal post...
>
> After so lo
Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!!
Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'...
man.. little DID I know.
Erm.. oh wait. the formal post...
After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey
Project is pleased to announce the rele
Daniel wrote:
> On 15/12/2016 6:40 PM, bdelmee wrote:
>> Richmond wrote on 2016-12-14 22:51:
>>> bdelmee writes:
>>>
Hello, I keep seeing people mentioning unofficial dev builds
and encouraging us to try those and report any issue before
2.46 comes out.
I am still using 2.
bdelmee wrote:
> Hello, I keep seeing people mentioning unoffical dev builds
> and encouraging us to try those and report any issue before
> 2.46 comes out.
>
> I am still using 2.38 as 2.40 had an annoying regression for me,
> which i'd like to check on the next beta and report if still present.
Hi,
Fwiw.. please *do* note that those 2.46 candidate builds are just
test builds. While it does have the sec fix, it isn't the official
candidate until I start spinning build 7.
Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozil
Paul Bergsagel wrote:
> Ant wrote:
>> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/09/28/2-46/
> Does this mean going forward that future releases will be easier for the
> developers to produce or will each release involve this much work?
>
> BTW thanks for all the hard work getting this release ready.
>
> Edmund,
>
> A good explanation.
>
> So, here's my question: Are there any Gecko alternatives out there that
> aren't changing at a such a furious rate? Something to give us a
> reasonable (and safe) SM but perhaps with a more consistent internal
> interface that would be simpler to integrate
Stephan Thiele wrote:
> Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why
> there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March,
> almost half a year ago.
No. Not a stupid question at all. In fact, it's a very good question.
> I am quite confused that there a
Hi,
Just wanted to mention that after figuring out bug 1271903 (reason:
PEBCAK! PEBCAK! PEBCAK! "kinda"), I've re-enabled to nightlies
for trunk and aurora. (Until the next bustage... :P )
Now the update here wrt Release, that is blocked by a patch that
needs to be pushed to c-r; but that's now
Hi Everyone,
I apologize for the delay in the updates working.
I just want to ask. Are the updates working? As in
2.35..2.39 can be updated to 2.40? I received an
email stating that there's still an issue.
Thanks
Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailin
Desiree wrote:
> On 4/22/2016 7:08 AM, Gerry Hickman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My SeaMonkey 2.39 is set to auto-update, but it has not updated to 2.40
>> yet? Even "Help : Check for Updates" says there are no updates
>> available...
>>
>
> We are all still waiting for a fix. It affects Windows 64 bit u
Edmund Wong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> They weren't generated properly at all. Currently fixing them (though,
> README is online).
>
> Once again, sorry for the fubar there..
>
>
> Edmund
>
I believe I've fixed this issue.
Edmund
_
Hi All,
Just wish to announce that I believe the updates are working
now.
Please confirm. I tried it locally and it looks ok.
Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seam
Fwiw, I indeedly-do did make a faux-pas...
The update step actually wasn't good and yet, I went
ahead and pushed to the end.
I am certain that this mistake will be rectified,
and those responsible will be punished. Those
gremlins. ;P
Seriously, I'm sorry for the screw up. Working on
the fix.
Hi,
I guess I did screw something up. :( (No surprise
there.)
The updates are available for OSX64 and it seems it's
only the complete one. The partials are also missing and
the Linux and Win32 updates went elsewhere
or didn't appear where they were supposed to.
I'm going back and checking it o
Ant wrote:
> On 3/14/2016 9:28 AM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
> ...
>> BTW IMPORTANT->the Check for updates menu items is broken on the Mac
>> claiming there is no new update.
>>
>> Please go here to find the update
>> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/
>
> No updates found in my very old, upda
Greetings,
After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey
Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.40!
So please check out [1] or [2].
Please note that the website information, while updated for
2.40, still requires a bit more work.
We cannot repeat this enough.
Rich Gray wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this??
>
> My Mac and an old XP system just say that there's no update available,
> as normal. ewong checked and did not see the problem either.
>
Should be ok now.
Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
supp
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
> Firefox 43 has been out for a bit, and has even gotten three point
> upgrades but I haven't seen any mention of a Seamonkey update. Is the
> Build Engine broken again?
>
Sorry for the delay. I've blogged about 2.40.
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/01/21/where-is-2-
Tom S. wrote:
> On 11/18/2015 3:42 AM, Edmund Wong wrote:
>> Tom S. wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Before upgrading to the latest version of SeaMonkey (v.2.39), in the
>>> mail/newsgroups/blogs window, under View, I could select "Save View as a
>>> Folder..
Tom S. wrote:
> Hi,
> Before upgrading to the latest version of SeaMonkey (v.2.39), in the
> mail/newsgroups/blogs window, under View, I could select "Save View as a
> Folder..." after filtering messages with a Search. But now, it doesn't
> work. What happened and how do I get it back without going
Hi,
Is it just me, or does 2.39 hang a lot? Especially with
getting email? After clicking get messages, it'd download
the stuff, and then hang for about ten seconds or so and
then resume (after switching windows on me). Like say
I am in the 3-pane message window. I click on "Get Msgs".
It'd d
Gerry Hickman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't fully understand the cause of the issue (client cert, server
> cert, string mismatch), but I did notice some about:config values in my
> own correctly updated 2.38 version.
>
> I wonder if they change
> app.update.cert.requireBuiltIn
> true -> false
> would
Daniel wrote:
> On 9/11/2015 1:43 PM, Edmund Wong wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Out of curiosity (despite being a little late), is anyone using
>> 2.38b1 and if so, did you get an update for 2.39b1?
>>
>> I just downloaded 2.38b1 and installed it on a separate syste
Hi,
Out of curiosity (despite being a little late), is anyone using
2.38b1 and if so, did you get an update for 2.39b1?
I just downloaded 2.38b1 and installed it on a separate system.
I did a check for updates, but it got nothing.
I'm quite concerned that I might have goofed something up when
I
Edmund Wong wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
> 2.39!
>
> For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.39b1, see the What's
> New in SeaMonkey 2.39 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
> conta
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.39!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.39b1, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.39 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
question
WaltS48 wrote:
>
> Short Beta test cycle?
>
> I see a comm-release build in my RSS feed for comm-release Changelog.
>
Yes.
Currently spinning 2.39.
Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.o
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.39b1!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.39b1, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.39b1 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
ques
David E. Ross wrote:
> Mozilla is ending support for NPAPI plugins by the end on 2016.
>
Where is this mentioned?
Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with
the GTK3 built version of 2.39.
TB and Firefox backed out the necessary manifests[1] in order
to build with gtk3 and I'm wondering if it's necessary
for us to follow suite.
Edmund
[1] - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
> Noticed there were a couple of "point releases" for Firefox and
> Thunderbird and was wondering if Seamonkey would be following suit?
>
I'm not too sure. I haven't heard anything from Callek.
Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing l
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.38, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.38 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
questi
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Jay O'Brien wrote:
>
>> I have 5 computers running Windows 7 and SeaMonkey 2.33.1. My wife
>> and I each use one as our primary mail and browsing computer, the
>> other three are used primarily to display our cameras, and they all
>> have web access.
>>
>> All five of th
SeaMonkey 2.38b1, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.38b1 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and
screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org.
Thank you
E
Dear All,
I'm just so stoked. (This isn't a normal release post as it's just way
to special.)
It is with great privilege and joy that I can announce to the world, the
SeaMonkey Project has just RELEASED SeaMonkey 2.35.
SeaMonkey 2.33.1 was released in March. It's now September. Yes, you
have a
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo