Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: > googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > > Sorry - i'm viewing on the web where all prior messages show up, I was > > trying to be space efficient. > > not everyone is viewing this group on google groups. > Some of us are using the mozilla newsgroup a

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Sorry - i'm viewing on the web where all prior messages show up, I was trying to be space efficient. not everyone is viewing this group on google groups. Some of us are using the mozi

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo again, others have asked that you email them an html message and then we'll go from there, and so far you have failed to do that. I'm happy to send a message to anyone. just supp

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

I agree that, for any message, if you take select Options -> Format -> send as Rich Text. It will travel as HTML. My request is a way to make this the default (i.e., override AutoDetect as the default in Options -> Format). I will now send you an email that, even though is composed as HTML, and S

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Mar 30, 5:41 pm, Leonidas Jones wrote: > Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: > > > googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > >> On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo > >>> again, others have asked that you email them an html > >>> message and then we'll go from there, and so far you > >>> have

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

The date and time was Monday, March 30, 2009 2:25:55 PM, and on a whim, googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Sorry - i'm viewing on the web where all prior messages show up, I was trying to be spac

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50 or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert it properly all the time, if I send in a proportional font, I want people to read it in a

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line that starts "Me". When I go into the sent folder and do a view -> message source, the blank line is there (although the message has been

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net wrote: > googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > > Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I > > composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line > > that starts "Me". When I go into the sent folder and do a view -> > > message source, the

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Mar 30, 6:44 pm, "Terry R." wrote: > The date and time was Monday, March 30, 2009 2:25:55 PM, and on a whim, > googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: > > > > > On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo > > wrote: > >> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > >>> Sorry - i'm viewing on the

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: On Mar 30, 6:44 pm, "Terry R." wrote: The date and time was Monday, March 30, 2009 2:25:55 PM, and on a whim, googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Sorry - i'm viewing

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Mar 30, 9:28 pm, Leonidas Jones wrote: > googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > > On Mar 30, 6:44 pm, "Terry R." wrote: > >> The date and time was Monday, March 30, 2009 2:25:55 PM, and on a whim, > >> googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: > > >>> On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hi

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On 03/30/2009 04:45 PM, Daniel wrote: > googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: >> Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50 >> or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems >> sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert it properly all the time, >> if I send in

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line that starts "Me". When I go into the sent folder and do a view -> message

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net wrote: > googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > > On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net > > wrote: > >> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > >>> Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I > >>> composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line > >>> that star

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net wrote: > googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > > On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net > > wrote: > >> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > >>> Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I > >>> composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line > >>> that star

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

NoOp wrote: On 03/30/2009 04:45 PM, Daniel wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50 or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert it properly all the time, if I send i

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on a whim, googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Ok - here's an example of the problem, based o

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

Daniel wrote: NoOp wrote: On 03/30/2009 04:45 PM, Daniel wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50 or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert it properly all the time

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, "Terry R." wrote: > The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on a whim, > googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: > > > > > On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net > > wrote: > >> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > >>> On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net > >>> wrote: >

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 4:48:11 PM, and on a whim, googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, "Terry R." wrote: The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on a whim, googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: On Mar 31

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

Terry R. wrote: The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 4:48:11 PM, and on a whim, googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, "Terry R." wrote: The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on a whim, googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboa

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Apr 1, 9:21 am, Ray_Net wrote: > Terry R. wrote: > > The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 4:48:11 PM, and on a whim, > > googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: > > >> On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, "Terry R." wrote: > >>> The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

The date and time was Wednesday, April 01, 2009 6:21:36 AM, and on a whim, Ray_Net pounded out on the keyboard: I can see how it is confusing, although I agree with the method. Most of us write a message and send it off. I compose in HTML and I have a serif font as my default. I have my set

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: On Apr 1, 9:21 am, Ray_Net wrote: Terry R. wrote: The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 4:48:11 PM, and on a whim, googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, "Terry R." wrote: The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM

Re: Enigmail für SeaMonkey 2.0

ws-Trunk-Nightlies from before the API-Change, and this Builds will work fine with the current SeaMonkey 2.0 Nightly-Builds (and the Beta 1 too), but sure without a complete localization. I can send you a copy of an working Eingmail-Windows-Trunk-Nightly-Build, if you like to get it. Ju

Re: Enigmail für SeaMonkey 2.0

Tobias Fischer wrote: Yes, that was really bad. Because Thunderbird 3.0pre has changed something in the API, the current Enigmail-Nightly-Builds won't work with SeaMonkey 2.0b1 or SeaMonkey-2.x-Nightly-Builds. We should 1) contact Patrick and ask him if he could support both for the time being

Re: Enigmail für SeaMonkey 2.0

eaMonkey-2.x-Nightly-Builds. > > But I have saved some of the Enigmail-Windows-Trunk-Nightlies from > before the API-Change, and this Builds will work fine with the current > SeaMonkey 2.0 Nightly-Builds (and the Beta 1 too), but sure without a > complete localization. > > I

Seamonkey 2.0 Beta profile structure

Good day I would like to know if in Seamonkey 2.0 beta is all Seamonkey 1.18 profiles dumped into on folder now It took me four days to reconstruct my emails after switching over for 9 days thanks ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support

SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product. Full news article: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2009-10-10 Downloads for

Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1

I had lighting running in Seamonkey 2.0 Beta, however when I try to install it to RC1, it breaks everything. Any ideas? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 2

SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 2 is now available for free download on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product. Full news article: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2009-10-19 Downloads for

SM 2.0 and Message Filters...

Hello all, my challenge today is with the message filter in SM 2.0 on an XP Pro machine. Each time I go to Tools > Run Filters on Folder the function does not work, as expected. I expect that I would be able to filter out messages in the folder selected to move emails to the folders in wh

Seamonkey 2.0 Folder Won't Open

When I try to open the new Seamonkey folder under Program Files, I get a Windows error (Windows Explorer has encountered a problem...)and have to close the folder. How do I fix this? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.or

Re: IE Tab for 2.0?

On 10/27/2009 3:51 PM Tom Pamin wrote: Is there a way to get the old IE Tab plugin (npietab.dll) to work in 2.0)? If not, what do we use? AFAIK there is no fully SM 2 compatible version of IE Tab yet. All version I tested (1.3.3, 1.5, 1.5 dev; all installed with the extensions compatibility

Re: IE Tab for 2.0?

Jens Hatlak wrote: On 10/27/2009 3:51 PM Tom Pamin wrote: Is there a way to get the old IE Tab plugin (npietab.dll) to work in 2.0)? If not, what do we use? AFAIK there is no fully SM 2 compatible version of IE Tab yet. All version I tested (1.3.3, 1.5, 1.5 dev; all installed with the

Re: IE Tab for 2.0?

On 10/27/2009 11:41 PM Tom Pamin wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: (...) All those versions also had in common that they didn't show IE Tab anywhere outside the Add-on Manager (and xSidebar's configuration drop-down) (...) Thanks - how did you get it to work if it didn't show up anywhere? As I sai

Re: IE Tab for 2.0?

Tom Pamin wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: On 10/27/2009 3:51 PM Tom Pamin wrote: Is there a way to get the old IE Tab plugin (npietab.dll) to work in 2.0)? If not, what do we use? AFAIK there is no fully SM 2 compatible version of IE Tab yet. All version I tested (1.3.3, 1.5, 1.5 dev; all

Re: Problem with Seamonkey 2.0

Tomas Thrainsson wrote: On Oct 27, 9:35 pm, Tomas Thrainsson wrote: I'm sorry to say, but there's a problem with the latest release. I upgraded it from 1.1.18 and after the upgrade I had a strange occurrence. Every time I try to run Seamonkey, it shuts down all by itself without ever opening a

Re: IE Tab for 2.0?

On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:10:01 +0100, Jens Hatlak wrote: > On 10/27/2009 3:51 PM Tom Pamin wrote: >> Is there a way to get the old IE Tab plugin (npietab.dll) to work in >> 2.0)? If not, what do we use? > > AFAIK there is no fully SM 2 compatible version of IE Tab yet. Al

SM 2.0 mail bookmarks question

Can anyone tell me if SM2 does a *physical* bookmarks sort (as 1.1.18 does). FF's inability to do so, the last time I tried it, was a deal-breaker for me. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/

Re: SM 2.0 Form Management

stion based on some previous reading on here. Is there any way in 2.0 to fill a complete form with 1 or 2 clicks(like with the current form manager) or are you forced to make a choice from drop downd in EACH form field? I think that's what they did. I can't imagine why they'd

Re: SM 2.0 Form Management

ownloaded the new version yet but have a question based on some > previous reading on here. Same for me. > Is there any way in 2.0 to fill a complete form with 1 or 2 clicks(like with > the current form manager) or are you forced to make a choice from drop downd > in EACH form field

Re: SM 2.0 Form Management

On 28/10/2009 10:30, Lucas Levrel wrote: My question: is there a way to make it remember only *part* of a form (e.g. login but not password)? And to make it remember some forms but not all (e.g. logging-in forms for forums but not for bank accounts)? Passwords are not saved by the form manager

Re: SM 2.0 Form Management

stion based on some previous reading on here. Is there any way in 2.0 to fill a complete form with 1 or 2 clicks(like with the current form manager) or are you forced to make a choice from drop downd in EACH form field? I miss the old form manager too. Maybe we&#x

Re: SM 1.1.18 and 2.0

Frosted Flake wrote: After installing 2.0 and migrating what I want from 1.1.18, I now have two SM versions. Can I just use Add/Remove programs to get rid of 1.1.18 without messing up 2.0? Yes. When are sure you don't need it, you might want to delete the old profile folder as well.

Re: SM 1.1.18 and 2.0

Interviewed by CNN on 28/10/2009 15:08, Leonidas Jones told the world: > Frosted Flake wrote: >> After installing 2.0 and migrating what I want from 1.1.18, I now have >> two SM versions. >> Can I just use Add/Remove programs to get rid of 1.1.18 without messing >> up 2.

Re: SM 1.1.18 to 2.0

Interviewed by CNN on 28/10/2009 16:11, cciaffone told the world: > Can someone please point me to a simplified procedure > to convert from 1.8 to 2.0, including email folders, > nicknames and addys, newsgroups, the url history list, > bookmarks, mail and news servers, etc. > &g

Re: SM 1.1.18 to 2.0

Marcelo wrote: 5. Install Seamonkey 2.0. It should offer to convert (copy) your old profile automatically. 6. Once you are satisfied that everything migrated normally, delete your old profile. Nope, never offered any such. I have now lost 3 accounts with email newsgroups bookmarks and

Re: SM 1.1.18 to 2.0

Interviewed by CNN on 28/10/2009 21:34, cciaffone told the world: > Nope, never offered any such. I have now lost 3 accounts with email > newsgroups bookmarks and history. Nothing remains. I am back to square 1. > Well, in that case, try migrating manually. Close Seamonkey and then open the "Pro

Re: SM 1.1.18 to 2.0

James wrote: For me it was simple: 1] Download file 2] Click on file 3] Follow instructions Note that I allowed all of the old profile data to be imported. I tried that several times. SM never asked about importing anything. Ended up with no identities. I'll give it one more go, than I'll

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - Update instructions

Robert Kaiser schrieb: Thank You very much, Robert. What I am looking for is a small update instruction. The Version two was announced yesterday like the previous smaller updates. But i mean to remember, that for example 1.18 and 2.0 are not so compatible with the personal options and data

Re: SM 1.1.18 to 2.0

e 1.1.18 was using. After removing that profile from disk I haven't been able to get 2.0 running at all. Never asked for the import wizard and using seamonkey.exe -migration had no effect at all. Now it tells me SM is running no matter what I do when I try to start it. I'm also back on 1

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - Update instructions

Gerd Schweizer wrote: What I am looking for is a small update instruction. The Version two was announced yesterday like the previous smaller updates. But i mean to remember, that for example 1.18 and 2.0 are not so compatible with the personal options and data. So i hesitate now installing the

Re: SM 2.0 Form Management

On 10/28/2009 03:50 AM, Mark Banner wrote: > On 28/10/2009 10:30, Lucas Levrel wrote: >> My question: is there a way to make it remember only *part* of a form >> (e.g. login but not password)? And to make it remember some forms but not >> all (e.g. logging-in forms for forums but not for bank accou

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

Ken Rudolph wrote: I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser. It used to be in SM 1.1.18 that I could spoof IE or Firefox (or even permanently change the User-Agent in the config file). But now the Too

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:52:35 -0700, /Ken Rudolph/: I seem to have solved this for the time being by adding "Firefox/3.5.4" to the general.useragent.extra.seamonkey line in about:config. Am I causing any potential permanent harm with this? You better define one more "general.useragent.extra.spoo

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:52:35 -0700, /Ken Rudolph/: I seem to have solved this for the time being by adding "Firefox/3.5.4" to the general.useragent.extra.seamonkey line in about:config. Am I causing any potential permanent harm with this? You better define one more "gen

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

Ken Rudolph wrote: I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser. Here's the message I get which freezes my browser & doesn't even allow the "Back" button to operate: The

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

On 10/29/2009 8:52 AM, Ken Rudolph wrote: > Ken Rudolph wrote: >> I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the >> SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser. >> >> It used to be in SM 1.1.18 that I could spoof IE or Firef

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

David E. Ross wrote: On 10/29/2009 8:52 AM, Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser. It used to be in SM 1.1.18 that I could spoof IE or Firefox (or even per

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

ll all others that SeaMonkey is indeed in use without any mention of Firefox. As far as financial institutions that refuse to sniff for "Gecko", I have a separate SeaMonkey profile only for accessing those accounts. There, I permanently spoof Firefox but with a UA string that says: Moz

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - Update instructions

Robert Kaiser wrote: Gerd Schweizer wrote: What I am looking for is a small update instruction. The Version two was announced yesterday like the previous smaller updates. But i mean to remember, that for example 1.18 and 2.0 are not so compatible with the personal options and data. So i

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

Ken Rudolph wrote: I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser. It used to be in SM 1.1.18 that I could spoof IE or Firefox (or even permanently change the User-Agent in the config file). But now

[RESOLVED] Re: SM1.1.18 to 2.0

On 10/29/2009 02:42 PM, BeeNeR wrote: ... > Problem solved! (:> After searching again manually through entire disk > I found a file profile.ini which when I looked at it contained a > reference to a profile that no longer existed. I renamed the file and > SM2 installed and imported the proper p

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser. It used to be in SM 1.1.18 that I could spoof IE or Firefox (or even permanently change the User-Agent in the co

Re: SM1.1.18 to 2.0 [RESOLVED]

old 1.1.x profile. > > That's why my original installation of the released version of 2.0 had > old information on startup. > > In trouble shooting I removed the all the old 1.1.x profiles. This now > meant that the 2.0 profile.ini which was in the 1.1.18 default directoy

Re: I Love SeaMonkey 2.0!

Ken Rudolph wrote: The title says it all. I'm discovering all sorts of things that now work that didn't before with SM 1.x. For instance: the Reference line now works the way it's supposed to! That's just one; but there are all sorts of big and little touches which are greatly appreciated. Than

Re: I Love SeaMonkey 2.0!

Ken Rudolph: >The title says it all. I'm discovering all sorts of things that now >work that didn't before with SM 1.x. For instance: the Reference >line now works the way it's supposed to! Ehm, if you expand Message-Id or References, your choice is forgotten at the next posting. At least it

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

;Gecko", I have a separate SeaMonkey profile only for accessing those accounts. There, I permanently spoof Firefox but with a UA string that says: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 NOT Firefox/3.5.3 For this, I

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser. It used to be in SM 1.1.18 that I could spoof IE or Firefox (or even permanently change the User-Agent in

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

Phillip Jones wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 10/29/2009 12:36 PM, Ken Rudolph wrote [in part]: /snip/ Is there a place to report such institutions that use browser sniffers. They shouldn't. Or to get them to sniff on gecko instead of a particular application? My suggestion is to contact the

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

refox. I riased Holy heck again but they refused to change the code. so I looked for alternative Because UA switcher hadn't been updated and it was pain to re-download the ua strings I ran across the addition of the /not/Firefox/2.0. If we had a way to report to Mozilla/Firefox/SeaMonkey about the

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

when necessary but tell all others >> that SeaMonkey is indeed in use without any mention of Firefox. >> >> As far as financial institutions that refuse to sniff for "Gecko", I >> have a separate SeaMonkey profile only for accessing those accounts. >> There, I permanently s

Re: I Love SeaMonkey 2.0!

Hartmut Figge wrote: Ken Rudolph: The title says it all. I'm discovering all sorts of things that now work that didn't before with SM 1.x. For instance: the Reference line now works the way it's supposed to! Ehm, if you expand Message-Id or References, your choice is forgotten at the next

Re: I Love SeaMonkey 2.0!

Barry Edwin Gilmour: >Any chance of linking us to your patch+info, Hartmut ? Barry. I could upload it, but let's see its size. h...@e675 ~ $ wc -l seam-patch/patch_status-drehlinge-2 29 seam-patch/patch_status-drehlinge-2 29 lines. Well, regarding the huge amount of quotings in many replies thi

Re: I Love SeaMonkey 2.0!

Hartmut Figge: >An attachment of such a small text file should be fine. Unless the >newsserver refuses. Let's try. Successful. What to do with the patch? Either applying to the source before compiling or editing the .xml in the ready SM2. Location there is seamonkey/chrome/messenger.jar->/conten

Re: I Love SeaMonkey 2.0!

Hartmut Figge wrote: Hartmut Figge: An attachment of such a small text file should be fine. Unless the newsserver refuses. Let's try. Successful. What to do with the patch? Either applying to the source before compiling or editing the .xml in the ready SM2. Location there is seamonkey/chrome

Re: I Love SeaMonkey 2.0!

Hartmut Figge wrote: Hartmut Figge: An attachment of such a small text file should be fine. Unless the newsserver refuses. Let's try. Successful. What to do with the patch? Either applying to the source before compiling or editing the .xml in the ready SM2. Location there is seamonkey/chrom

Re: I Love SeaMonkey 2.0!

Barry Edwin Gilmour: >Hartmut, I just-discovered it works in my POP email-accounts, all my >NNTP newsgroups and also in the RSS_Blogs-and-News-feeds accounts, >as-well. Once-again, many-thanks for that much-appreciated improvement! Sometimes i am angry enough about a problem, that i look into

Form Manager Replacemenmt for 2.0?

Has anyone found a good replacement to use with 2.0 for the now missing Form Manager from 1.18? Does Roboform work with 2.0? Is it similar to Form Manager? I sure hope developers rethink the removal of Form Manager from 1.18, and add it back to 2.0

Re: SM 2.0 Form Management

Le 29 octobre 2009, NoOp a écrit : > > On 28/10/2009 10:30, Lucas Levrel wrote: > >> And to make it remember some forms but not > >> all (e.g. logging-in forms for forums but not for bank accounts)? > > Relevant bug: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=304309 > [convert to satchel from

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - Update instructions

Robert Kaiser schrieb: SeaMonkey 2.0 doesn't destroy any of your old data, it copies it to a new location and migrates it into the formats used now. The install instructions are at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/install-and-uninstall Thank You very much Robert for Your a

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - Update instructions

Gerd Schweizer wrote: Thank You very much Robert for Your answer. During the last days You are very busy, i guess. It was worse before the release, when I needed to make sure everything works out and it can be done. Now, the vast amount of work is keeping up with all the feedback and messages

Seamonky 2.0 E-Mail problem

I installed 2.0 and now I cant send email. I get this message. "Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server smtp.west.cox.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen to use authentication. Uncheck 'Us

Re: I Love SeaMonkey 2.0!

Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: [MailNews References header twisty] I know votes don't mean much, but is there a bug raised that I could vote on it! As you can see from the comments the basic approach was rejected for not remembering the state

Re: Cannot Install Seamonkey 2.0?

Interviewed by CNN on 30/10/2009 21:42, Steven Hilgendorf told the world: > Trying to install Seamonkey 2.0 on Windows Visa Premium. When I > double-click on the install file it unpacks and throws up a Run As > dialog indicating "You my not have the necessary permissions to

Sea Monkey 2.0 spoofing - Again

Hello, I am still not getting the "File, Open." toolbox tabs when I download and run Sea Monkey 2.0. However, 1.1.18 has been running fine. I have tried the following without any success.. Sea Monkey 2.0 spoofing 1) Navigator Window - about:config 2) Click thru warning

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 10/29/2009 12:36 PM, Ken Rudolph wrote [in part]: /snip/ Is there a place to report such institutions that use browser sniffers. They shouldn't. Or to get them to sniff on gecko instead of a particular application? My sugge

Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

niffer, bit only for Firefox. I riased Holy heck again but they refused to change the code. so I looked for alternative Because UA switcher hadn't been updated and it was pain to re-download the ua strings I ran across the addition of the /not/Firefox/2.0. If we had a way to report to Mozilla/Fire

SM 2.0 configuration parameter - browser.cache.check_doc_frequency

Could someone tell me what exactly the function of the SM 2.0 configuration parameter called: browser.cache.check_doc_frequency is for and how its value may impact performance? The parameter appears to suggest how frequently the browser would check its cache folder for a file or document

Re: SM 2.0 bookmarks question

cmcadams schrieb: > Can anyone tell me if SM2's bookmarks sorts are 'persistent' (as in > 1.1.18's physical sort of the html file). FF's inability to do this, the > last time I tried it, was a deal-breaker. I've read that SM's bookmarks > are now stored in a 'database', but that doesn't tell me any

Re: Cannot Install Seamonkey 2.0?

Marcelo wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 30/10/2009 21:42, Steven Hilgendorf told the world: Trying to install Seamonkey 2.0 on Windows Visa Premium. When I double-click on the install file it unpacks and throws up a Run As dialog indicating "You my not have the necessary permissions to us

Re: SM 2.0 bookmarks question

ow stored in a 'database', but that doesn't tell me anything about defaults or behavior. SM2 still uses a bookmarks.html regards Martin ...as a follow up question - is there any way I can get rid of the grayed out "(Empty)" entries in my Bookmarks folde

SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0 now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong 128 bit?..I hope... ...it would also be nice if the Password Quality meter that

Re: Downloading files in 2.0

George Carden schrieb: > Overall, I'm loving 2.0! Thanks, and congrats!!! > > One question I'm having though is, what happened to the box that used to > open after a file downloads which gave 3 choices on what to do: > > 1) Open file > 2) Close > 3) Open file

Re: Downloading files in 2.0

Martin Freitag wrote: George Carden schrieb: Overall, I'm loving 2.0! Thanks, and congrats!!! One question I'm having though is, what happened to the box that used to open after a file downloads which gave 3 choices on what to do: 1) Open file 2) Close 3) Open file location It h

Failure to install SeaMonkey 2.0

I have been using Seamonkey 1.1.17 on three home computers. Yesterday I tried to install Seamonkey 2.0 on a lap top and a desktop computer. In each case the installation proceeded without incident to the Finish screen. With Launch program checked, I expected SeaMonkey to open, but nothing

Re: Cannot Install Seamonkey 2.0?

:13:55 -0500 From: Steven Hilgendorf To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: Cannot Install Seamonkey 2.0? Message-ID: <_vwdnb5wf6vt7xhxnz2dnuvz_vkdn...@mozilla.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Marcelo wrote: > Interviewed by CNN on 30/10/2009

Re: Cannot Install Seamonkey 2.0?

James a utilisé son clavier pour écrire : To me a h*ll of a lot of things in Vista seem "funny" [as in odd, counter intuitive]. How/when/why "administrator" needs to be called on my pc where no one except me has access is still a puzzle. But then I'm NOT a geek... James . . It is to protec

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >