I was toying with SM 2.50 last week and it automatically updated to 2.51
Saturday.
Anyhow, for what it's worth. The functions that I use, so far, have worked
fine.
--
"This is America! You can't make a horse
testify against himself!" Mister Ed
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
My recollection is 2.35, but either way, the point is you have to
install one update manually to get past the certificate issue, and from
then on auto updates will work again.
I was able to visit over the holidays, and the new SM is now installed
and working. It turns
Edmund Wong wrote:
Gerry Hickman wrote:
Hi,
I don't fully understand the cause of the issue (client cert, server
cert, string mismatch), but I did notice some about:config values in my
own correctly updated 2.38 version.
I wonder if they change
app.update.cert.requireBuiltIn
true -> false
Gerry Hickman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't fully understand the cause of the issue (client cert, server
> cert, string mismatch), but I did notice some about:config values in my
> own correctly updated 2.38 version.
>
> I wonder if they change
> app.update.cert.requireBuiltIn
> true -> false
> would
admin rights to download and install a fresh copy
of the SeaMonkey distribution.
However, in this case I'd like to try to get their auto-update working
(long story) so they can get onto >2.38, and then it should be OK.
I don't fully understand the cause of the issue (client cert, server
cert,
Eric schrieb:
Seamonkey used to just download and install migrating everything over,
does it not do this anymore?
Why?
Sorry, because i don't have an answer. But sometimes when i look at the
version in help, there is a comment telling me to be in an download
phase. At any time a new version
Eric wrote on 10/11/2015 21:03:
Seamonkey used to just download and install migrating everything over,
does it not do this anymore?
Why?
Eric
I never use the auto-update.
I always remove the current SM then I install the new one.
___
support
Ray_Net wrote:
Eric wrote on 10/11/2015 21:03:
Seamonkey used to just download and install migrating everything over,
does it not do this anymore?
Why?
Eric
I never use the auto-update.
I always remove the current SM then I install the new one.
Got the pop-up prompt this morning inviting
Eric wrote:
SeaMonkey used to just download and install migrating everything over,
does it not do this anymore?
What are your settings?
Edit | Preferences | Advanced | Software Installation:
...
SeaMonkey
[x] Automatically check for updates (•) daily (o) weekly
[ ] Automatically download and
Seamonkey used to just download and install migrating everything over,
does it not do this anymore?
Why?
Eric
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Mike C wrote:
EE wrote:
Mike C wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can
Original Message
*Subject: *Re: Auto Update
*From: *Mike C rp...@earthlink.net
*To: *
*Date: *Fri Sep 26 2014 01:38:34 GMT+0200 (CEST)
Ed Mullen wrote:
EE wrote:
Mike C wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must
Mike C wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can use it to get
email
stan wrote:
Michael Speier wrote:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0
SeaMonkey/2.26.1
I think it is better to upgrade your Windows XP before downgrade your
SeaMonkey!
So are you saying that if I want to continue using SM that I must
upgrade to Windows 7
Mike C wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can use it to get
email
EE wrote:
Mike C wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can use it to get
EE wrote:
Mike C wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can use it to get
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Mike C wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can
Ed Mullen wrote:
EE wrote:
Mike C wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I
Mike C wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
EE wrote:
Mike C wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted
On 09/25/2014 04:26 PM, Mike C wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Mike C wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book
WaltS48 wrote:
On 09/23/2014 07:27 PM, stan wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted
On 09/24/2014 09:40 AM, stan wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 09/23/2014 07:27 PM, stan wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0
SeaMonkey/2.26.1
I think it is better to upgrade your Windows XP before downgrade your
SeaMonkey!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
stan wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can use it to get
email
Michael Speier wrote:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0
SeaMonkey/2.26.1
I think it is better to upgrade your Windows XP before downgrade your
SeaMonkey!
So are you saying that if I want to continue using SM that I must
upgrade to Windows 7 or 8?
That
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can use it to get
email addresses, and open
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can use it to get
email addresses, and open a compose
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can use it to get
email addresses, and open
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can use it to get
email addresses, and open
On 09/23/2014 07:27 PM, stan wrote:
EE wrote:
stan wrote:
How can I suppress Auto Update for SM?
The SM2.29 is too buggy so I must keep reinstalling SM2.26
-Stan
I found only 2 bugs, and I found workarounds for both of them. The
address book is properly sorted in the sidebar, so I can use
Francesco Presel wrote:
I'm currently using the Linux 64-bit experimental build, only available
in English, which means I must use a language pack in order to localize
seamonkey.
Every time I update Seamonkey, the language pack is not automatically
updated, and the old, now incompatible version
I'm currently using the Linux 64-bit experimental build, only available
in English, which means I must use a language pack in order to localize
seamonkey.
Every time I update Seamonkey, the language pack is not automatically
updated, and the old, now incompatible version remains. So, every time
User wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
Saturday night, I did the auto-update from SM 2.0.14 to SM 2.2 on my
Mandriva Linux 2009.0
Now I find I've got an empty bookmarks file. Searching for Bookmark
brings a zero result. It seems the only old site
Saturday night, I did the auto-update from SM 2.0.14 to SM 2.2 on my
Mandriva Linux 2009.0
Now I find I've got an empty bookmarks file. Searching for Bookmark
brings a zero result. It seems the only old site addresses I've keep
are those in the address bar drop down.
Anybody got any advise
Daniel schrieb:
Saturday night, I did the auto-update from SM 2.0.14 to SM 2.2 on my
Mandriva Linux 2009.0
Now I find I've got an empty bookmarks file. Searching for Bookmark
brings a zero result. It seems the only old site addresses I've keep
are those in the address bar drop down.
Try to go
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
Saturday night, I did the auto-update from SM 2.0.14 to SM 2.2 on my
Mandriva Linux 2009.0
Now I find I've got an empty bookmarks file. Searching for Bookmark
brings a zero result. It seems the only old site addresses I've keep
are those in the address bar
Daniel wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
Saturday night, I did the auto-update from SM 2.0.14 to SM 2.2 on my
Mandriva Linux 2009.0
Now I find I've got an empty bookmarks file. Searching for Bookmark
brings a zero result. It seems the only old site addresses I've keep
are those
Interviewed by CNN on 18/07/2011 02:07, Bill Davidsen told the world:
From my view, in every release there are new features, improvements and
bugfixes haven't come to my attention. I like a model where eventually you
release something fully functional.
I'm not entirely clear on the meaning
On 7/18/2011 1:07 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
I have a bet with someone here that the reaction to my post will be a
personal attack on my tone, accusations of being a whiner, and no
corrective response to the issues I raised.
Or more importantly I did not intend my original questions to be cause
Thanx for everyone's answers. That was very helpful.
Hawker
On 7/15/2011 12:47 PM, The digits of Jens Hatlak's hands composed the
following:
hawker wrote:
1) I see my 2.0.x still says no update. Will there be a 2.2 auto update
soon?
There will be one but I cannot tell when.
I'm wondering
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 15/07/2011 10:41, hawker told the world:
This is not a flame, I've rewritten it twice to reduce personal criticism. It's
just how I see the new model;.
2) I'm just curious about versioning. Perhaps I just don't understand
fully what changed. From what
Hey all, two questions.
1) I see my 2.0.x still says no update. Will there be a 2.2 auto update
soon? I'm wondering if I should install it or if I should wait for
2.2.1. I usually skip a X.0.0 release so I don't get the bad bugs (did
not do 2.0 until 2.0.4 I think).
2) I'm just curious
Interviewed by CNN on 15/07/2011 10:41, hawker told the world:
2) I'm just curious about versioning. Perhaps I just don't understand
fully what changed. From what I understand 2.1 has a decent number of
changes. It perhaps should have been 2.5 not 2.1. But what I don't
understand is I
On 7/15/2011 9:41 AM, hawker wrote:
1) I see my 2.0.x still says no update. Will there be a 2.2 auto update
soon? I'm wondering if I should install it or if I should wait for
2.2.1. I usually skip a X.0.0 release so I don't get the bad bugs (did
not do 2.0 until 2.0.4 I think
hawker wrote:
1) I see my 2.0.x still says no update. Will there be a 2.2 auto update
soon?
There will be one but I cannot tell when.
I'm wondering if I should install it or if I should wait for
2.2.1. I usually skip a X.0.0 release so I don't get the bad bugs (did
not do 2.0 until 2.0.4 I
47 matches
Mail list logo
