I've lost the bar on which to place e-mail addresses when composing. I
am using the latest Sea Monkey with Windows. Also there are frequent Sea
Monkey crashes now when mail arrives and I click on the notice to open it.
--
Julia Bolton Holloway, Mediatheca 'Fioretta Mazzei', 'English' Cemetery,
Hi; I recently began having a problem with my e-mail. In a number of
instances, when messages get moved from the Inbox to another folder -
either manually or by my message filters (which had for years always
worked properly) - they become corrupted. In some cases all contents
including the
Jim P wrote:
I have Win 7, SM 2.9. In the past week I have had a problem with
messages in that I can read them when I receive them. Then when I go
back to them they have reverted to the coding for the message.
SM 2.9 is still in beta. There was a problem with SM 2.9b2 (maybe also
2.9b1,
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Jim P wrote:
I have Win 7, SM 2.9. In the past week I have had a problem with
messages in that I can read them when I receive them. Then when I go
back to them they have reverted to the coding for the message.
SM 2.9 is still in beta. There was a problem with SM 2.9b2
freelance writer
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
John wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple to do) would
suffice.
Upgrading also gets the user off a
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple to do) would
suffice.
Upgrading also gets
On 11-07-20 9:41 PM, Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple to do)
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple to do) would
suffice.
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple to do) would
suffice.
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey?
John
--
Q: What's the quickest way to get a mailbox full of spam?
A: Post a message in any
John wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey?
Yahoo is clueless with their browser sniffer. You will need to add
NOT Firefox/3.6
Show here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530786
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 11-07-19 11:38 AM, John wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey?
If I understand correctly, upgrading to the latest version of
chokito wrote:
If I understand correctly, upgrading to the latest version of SeaMonkey
will fix it.http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
Yeas, because the user-agent will show as default both, FF and SM:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Firefox/5.0
SeaMonkey/2.2
Only if
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
John wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey?
Yahoo is clueless with their browser sniffer. You
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
John wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not
SeaMonkey?
Yahoo is clueless
Mike C wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Mike C wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Mike C wrote:
George Pat Achilles wrote:
...
Mike C, as I understand it, the limit is not so much how many messages
you have in you box, but the total size of all the messages, even those
supposedly deleted since you last
Mike C wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Mike C wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Mike C wrote:
George Pat Achilles wrote:
...
Mike C, as I understand it, the limit is not so much how many messages
you have in you box, but the total size of all the messages, even those
supposedly deleted since you last
Rick Merrill wrote:
Mike C wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Mike C wrote:
George Pat Achilles wrote:
...
Mike C, as I understand it, the limit is not so much how many messages
you have in you box, but the total size of all the messages, even those
supposedly deleted since you last Compacted your
Daniel wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Mike C wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Mike C wrote:
George Pat Achilles wrote:
...
Mike C, as I understand it, the limit is not so much how many messages
you have in you box, but the total size of all the messages, even those
supposedly deleted since you last
Rick Merrill wrote:
Mike C wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Mike C wrote:
George Pat Achilles wrote:
...
Mike C, as I understand it, the limit is not so much how many messages
you have in you box, but the total size of all the messages, even those
supposedly deleted since you last Compacted your
Mike C wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Mike C wrote:
George Pat Achilles wrote:
...
Mike C, as I understand it, the limit is not so much how many messages
you have in you box, but the total size of all the messages, even those
supposedly deleted since you last Compacted your file, and all the
Mike C wrote:
George Pat Achilles wrote:
To Whom it may concern,
During the last two weeks I have been having a problem retrieving my
e-mails from web mail into my regular e-mail. I am constantly receiving
a message that my e-mail mail box is full, yet I know that this is not
true because I
Daniel wrote:
Mike C wrote:
George Pat Achilles wrote:
To Whom it may concern,
During the last two weeks I have been having a problem retrieving my
e-mails from web mail into my regular e-mail. I am constantly receiving
a message that my e-mail mail box is full, yet I know that this is not
To Whom it may concern,
During the last two weeks I have been having a problem retrieving my
e-mails from web mail into my regular e-mail. I am constantly receiving
a message that my e-mail mail box is full, yet I know that this is not
true because I only have very few messages in my inbox.
George Pat Achilles wrote:
To Whom it may concern,
During the last two weeks I have been having a problem retrieving my
e-mails from web mail into my regular e-mail. I am constantly receiving
a message that my e-mail mail box is full, yet I know that this is not
true because I only have very
WLS wrote:
George Pat Achilles wrote:
To Whom it may concern,
During the last two weeks I have been having a problem retrieving my
e-mails from web mail into my regular e-mail. I am constantly receiving
a message that my e-mail mail box is full, yet I know that this is not
true because I only
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
George Pat Achilles wrote:
To Whom it may concern,
During the last two weeks I have been having a problem retrieving my
e-mails from web mail into my regular e-mail. I am constantly receiving
a message that my e-mail mail box is full, yet I know that this is not
George Pat Achilles wrote:
To Whom it may concern,
During the last two weeks I have been having a problem retrieving my
e-mails from web mail into my regular e-mail. I am constantly receiving
a message that my e-mail mail box is full, yet I know that this is not
true because I only have very
I installed 2.0 and now I cant send email. I get this message.
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
smtp.west.cox.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but
you have chosen to use authentication. Uncheck 'Use name and
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
I installed 2.0 and now I cant send email. I get this message.
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
smtp.west.cox.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but
you have chosen to use
35 matches
Mail list logo
