___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 1/4/2010 10:24 AM, me2 wrote:
Yep. That would be nice ... would be nice if Firefox used the Old
SeaMonkey Form Manager, too!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonke
MikeyG wrote:
On 1/4/2010 10:24 AM, me2 wrote:
Yep. That would be nice ... would be nice if Firefox used the Old
SeaMonkey Form Manager, too!
The subject has been beat to death. The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so.
As a workable subs
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
wrote:
> The powers that be don't have the
>manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
"free" software, will defined by a few - the genius of its origin was
a
On 01/05/2010 11:27 AM, me2 wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
> wrote:
>
>> The powers that be don't have the
>>manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
>
>
> I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
> "free" software, will
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
"free" software, will defined by a few - the genius of its o
On 1/5/2010 4:27 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
"free" software, w
I'm going to make the unlikely assumption that your posting was of
good intent - that you surely recognized that the initial post was a
plea to the seamonkey community to restore what I believe is an
important part of the original Netscape heritage. That my followup
plainly said I belied that the l
t; someone's touchy-feeling mode is on way high.
The inital post was a blank msg:
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:23:53 -0600
> From: me2
> Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey
> Subject: Restore Form manger...(no content)
> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:24:03 -
MikeyG wrote:
On 1/4/2010 10:24 AM, me2 wrote:
Yep. That would be nice ... would be nice if Firefox used the Old
SeaMonkey Form Manager, too!
...would be even nicer if it encrypted the contents of the Form
Manager...if it doesn't. The user can't really tell.
--
- Rufus
_
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
"free" software, will defined by a few
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
"free" software, will def
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
"f
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want to be always visible -
SM did not permit
Rufus wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, o
Rufus schrieb:
...and I like the idea of using a standalone outside of the browser
itself which is integrated as a part of the basic function of the OS -
does the PC and/or Linux world incllude anything similar to Apple
Keychain? If so, maybe the way to go is to exploit that (existing?)
capabilit
Phillip Jones wrote:
> iCab is unusual in that it will (automatically if turned on check for
> bad code based on latest w3c specs. Green smile face shows up if correct
> or a Purple Sad face show if there are errors. you can click on this and
> generate a report which you can then save as a text fi
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
iCab is unusual in that it will (automatically if turned on check for
bad code based on latest w3c specs. Green smile face shows up if correct
or a Purple Sad face show if there are errors. you can click on this and
generate a report which you can then
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want to be always visible -
SM
On 1/6/2010 8:26 AM, chicagofan wrote:
> Ray_Net wrote:
>> NoOp wrote:
>>
>>> That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
>>> Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
>>> already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
>>>
>> Forte Agent p
me2 wrote:
I'm going to make the unlikely assumption that your posting was of
good intent - that you surely recognized that the initial post was a
plea to the seamonkey community to restore what I believe is an
important part of the original Netscape heritage.
A "blank" message serves no purpos
Phillip Jones wrote:
> Doesn't work of Mac OSX.
You mean HTML Validator extension doesn't work on Mac OSX?
I wouldn't know about that. It works on Windows, but you have to hack the
version numbers for SM2.
--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mail
Phillip Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
iCab is unusual in that it will (automatically if turned on check for
bad code based on latest w3c specs. Green smile face shows up if correct
or a Purple Sad face show if there are errors. you can click on this and
generate a rep
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/6/2010 8:26 AM, chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent p
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Doesn't work of Mac OSX.
You mean HTML Validator extension doesn't work on Mac OSX?
I wouldn't know about that. It works on Windows, but you have to hack the
version numbers for SM2.
If that's what he means, lets look a little deeper:
http://use
On 1/6/2010 9:40 AM, chicagofan wrote:
> Mark Hansen wrote:
>> On 1/6/2010 8:26 AM, chicagofan wrote:
>>> You can cancel *your* posts with SM [the same as any other program as
>>> far as I know]. If you mean other people's posts, all you have to do is
>>
>> The client usually allows for a way to
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/6/2010 9:40 AM, chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/6/2010 8:26 AM, chicagofan wrote:
You can cancel *your* posts with SM [the same as any other program as
far as I know]. If you mean other people's posts, all you have to do is
The client usually allows for a
chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want to be
Ray_Net wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have the post
Ray_Net wrote:
>>> Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want to be always visible -
>>> SM did not permit that.
>>> Forte Agent permit us to delete the posts we want SM did not permit
>>> that.
>>
>> I don't understand either of these comments.
>>
> If you work only with SM and never with For
David Wilkinson wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want to be always visible -
SM did not permit that.
Forte Agent permit us to delete the posts we want SM did not permit
that.
I don't understand either of these comments.
If you work only with SM and never with
On 1/6/2010 1:26 PM, chicagofan wrote:
> Mark Hansen wrote:
>>
>> It sounded to me like they wanted to cancel their post. This is ultimately
>> a function of the news server. The user can demand the feature in their
>> news client all they want, but if the server doesn't provide the feature,
>> it'
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
wrote:
I know Camino does, and I was a bit surprised to find that Google Chrome
does too. I'm also a bit surprised at how much alike Saf
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...and I like the idea of using a standalone outside of the browser
itself which is integrated as a part of the basic function of the OS -
does the PC and/or Linux world incllude anything similar to Apple
Keychain? If so, maybe the way to go is to exploit that
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
wrote:
I know Camino does, and I was a bit surprised to find that Google Chrome
does too. I'm also a bit surprised at how mu
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Doesn't work of Mac OSX.
You mean HTML Validator extension doesn't work on Mac OSX?
I wouldn't know about that. It works on Windows, but you have to hack the
version numbers for SM2.
yes. Now it does work in FF, and I in fact used it to clear some
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
iCab is unusual in that it will (automatically if turned on check for
bad code based on latest w3c specs. Green smile face shows up if correct
or a Purple Sad face show if there are errors. you can click on
Leonidas Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Doesn't work of Mac OSX.
You mean HTML Validator extension doesn't work on Mac OSX?
I wouldn't know about that. It works on Windows, but you have to hack the
version numbers for SM2.
If that's what he means, lets look a lit
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
wrote:
I know Camino does, and I was a bit surprised to find that Google Chrome
does too. I'm also a
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Doesn't work of Mac OSX.
You mean HTML Validator extension doesn't work on Mac OSX?
I wouldn't know about that. It works on Windows, but you have to hack
the
version numbers for SM2.
If that's what he
Ray_Net wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:32:47 -0500, David Wilkinson wrote:
> Phillip Jones wrote:
>> Doesn't work of Mac OSX.
>
> You mean HTML Validator extension doesn't work on Mac OSX?
>
> I wouldn't know about that. It works on Windows, but you have to hack the
> version numbers for SM2.
HTML Validator is
Rufus schrieb:
My initial point/suggestion was to leverage capability built into the
individual OS...thus allowing you to drop some code altogether.
By introducing at least three code paths for the three major platforms,
and probably some more for others like Solaris, AIX, OS/2 and whatever
e
chicagofan schrieb:
A "blank" message serves no purpose but to annoy other people who come
to this "support forum" looking for help with their problems.
Right, and that's why my reply to the OP is just as useless. "no
content" probably even deserves no reply at all. :P
Robert Kaiser
On 01/07/2010 04:40 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Rufus schrieb:
>> My initial point/suggestion was to leverage capability built into the
>> individual OS...thus allowing you to drop some code altogether.
>
> By introducing at least three code paths for the three major platforms,
> and probably some
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
My initial point/suggestion was to leverage capability built into the
individual OS...thus allowing you to drop some code altogether.
By introducing at least three code paths for the three major platforms,
and probably some more for others like Solaris, AIX
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:22:59 -0800, NoOp wrote:
> Including the multiple variations/flavours/versions of those platforms.
>
> In fact I find it quite remarkable that SeaMonkey/Mozilla/OSS et al
> manage to actually get everything (well most everything) to work in
> Windows flavours from Win2K to
Rufus schrieb:
Which you do already in maintaining a multi-platform product, so it's
not a stretch.
Oh, but maintaining a single code path for all platforms is much easier
than 4-5 different ones!
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
su
NoOp schrieb:
On 01/07/2010 04:40 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
My initial point/suggestion was to leverage capability built into the
individual OS...thus allowing you to drop some code altogether.
By introducing at least three code paths for the three major platforms,
and probably
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
Which you do already in maintaining a multi-platform product, so it's
not a stretch.
Oh, but maintaining a single code path for all platforms is much easier
than 4-5 different ones!
Robert Kaiser
Yeah...I'm not a coder, so I'm not really sure how you do
I'm the dummy who started this topic, and I apologize to those who
found my message format, content, etc., incorrect.
I let my frustration with the loss of a, to me, highly valued part of
seamonkey - form manager color my remarks.
Since then I've messed with the various suggestions for forms made
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:21:54 -05001, Phillip Jones wrote:
> For example here is error report for Mozilla.org opening (home) page:
> http://www.phillipmjones.net/MozillaErrors.text
"http://www.mozilla.org/
HTML Error (0, 0): The Doctype definition of the document is unknown."
> It couldn't find D
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:21:54 -05001, Phillip Jones wrote:
For example here is error report for Mozilla.org opening (home) page:
http://www.phillipmjones.net/MozillaErrors.text
"http://www.mozilla.org/
HTML Error (0, 0): The Doctype definition of the document is unknown."
53 matches
Mail list logo
