Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 8/14/10 6:57 PM, Jay Garcia wrote: On 14.08.2010 15:15, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir Stamenkov

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

David E. Ross wrote: On 8/14/10 1:07 PM, Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 8/13/10 2:27 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 15:18, Jay Garcia wrote: --- Original Message --- Try these links in a few browsers: http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images/logo.gif

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Jay Garcia wrote: On 14.08.2010 17:22, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

David E. Ross wrote: On 8/14/10 6:57 PM, Jay Garcia wrote: On 14.08.2010 15:15, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message ---

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Hi, Ray_Net a tapoté, le 15/08/2010 10:50: [.] http://raymond.homedns.org/IMAGES\pose-yoga.jpg It works! GET /IMAGES%5Cpose-yoga.jpg HTTP/1.1 -- Stéphane http://pasdenom.info ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 15.08.2010 03:48, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- My example and your example doesn't work here with SM 2.0.6 or FF 3.0.8 This is normal that my exemple did not work for you, because at the taime of you test, my pc was power off, and i was sleeping :-) J. Weaver Jr. have proved

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 15.08.2010 03:50, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- David E. Ross wrote: On 8/14/10 6:57 PM, Jay Garcia wrote: On 14.08.2010 15:15, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote:

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 8/15/10 1:50 AM, Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 8/14/10 6:57 PM, Jay Garcia wrote: On 14.08.2010 15:15, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 8/11/10 7:47 AM, Ray_Net wrote: http://home.scarlet.be/~pin10521/didyouseethepicture.htm Final analysis: You have constructed a URI that is invalid according to RFC 3986 because it uses \ in place of / to represent part of the path to an image file. The Gecko engine used by Firefox and

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

David E. Ross wrote: On 8/15/10 1:50 AM, Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 8/14/10 6:57 PM, Jay Garcia wrote: On 14.08.2010 15:15, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

David E. Ross wrote: On 8/11/10 7:47 AM, Ray_Net wrote: http://home.scarlet.be/~pin10521/didyouseethepicture.htm Final analysis: You have constructed a URI that is invalid according to RFC 3986 because it uses \ in place of / to represent part of the path to an image file. The Gecko engine

Re: OT population (was Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE)

NoOp wrote: On 08/13/2010 04:45 AM, Daniel wrote: JeffM wrote: David E. Ross wrote: snip Yup. *More*. Especially if you're in the 4th most populous nation: :Firefox’s share on many of the top Indonesian websites :is between 65-75%.

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

David E. Ross wrote: On 8/13/10 2:27 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 15:18, Jay Garcia wrote: --- Original Message --- Try these links in a few browsers: http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images/logo.gif Ok http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images\logo.gif

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:32:34 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: The problem with the

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:32:34 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:32:34 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Stanimir Stamenkov

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 8/13/10 2:27 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 15:18, Jay Garcia wrote: --- Original Message --- Try these links in a few browsers: http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images/logo.gif Ok

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 14.08.2010 15:15, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:32:34 +0200,

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 14.08.2010 15:21, J. Weaver Jr. wrote: --- Original Message --- Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu,

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 14.08.2010 17:22, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Jay Garcia: On 14.08.2010 15:21, J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Could you try ... with SM the following: http://raymond.homedns.org/IMAGES\pose-yoga.jpg WFM, with SM 2.0.6. -JW Doesn't here with any browser, get this: Failed to Connect It had worked for me on SM 2.1, but now there

OT population (was Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE)

JeffM wrote: David E. Ross wrote: snip Yup. *More*. Especially if you're in the 4th most populous nation: :Firefox’s share on many of the top Indonesian websites :is between 65-75%. http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2010/06/29/mozilla-in-indonesia-2010/ India 1Bill, China 1Bill, US of A approx

Re: OT population (was Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE)

On 08/13/2010 04:45 AM, Daniel wrote: JeffM wrote: David E. Ross wrote: snip Yup. *More*. Especially if you're in the 4th most populous nation: :Firefox’s share on many of the top Indonesian websites :is between 65-75%. http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2010/06/29/mozilla-in-indonesia-2010/

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

NoOp wrote: On 08/12/2010 04:42 PM, NoOp wrote: ... I agree with David regarding the rfc... however: The link doesn't work with Opera (linux) as well. But it *does* work with Chromium 5.0.375.125 (53311) Ubuntu 10.04 (linux), and Epiphany Web Browser 2.30.2 (linux). Sorry, forgot to mention

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:32:34 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: The problem with the non-standard compliant behavior of IE in this case is the URI may contain \ (back-slash) as non-hierarchical separator, therefore IE will incorrectly transform it to a forward

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 08/13/2010 09:06 AM, Ray_Net wrote: NoOp wrote: On 08/12/2010 04:42 PM, NoOp wrote: ... I agree with David regarding the rfc... however: The link doesn't work with Opera (linux) as well. But it *does* work with Chromium 5.0.375.125 (53311) Ubuntu 10.04 (linux), and Epiphany Web Browser

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 08/13/2010 09:11 AM, Ray_Net wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: ... I think David E. Ross has given you a very probable explanation in another reply: news://news.mozilla.org:119/euqdnsazdykfwv7rnz2dnuvz_uadn...@mozilla.org If you want to find out for real, you could ask the Mozilla devs in

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:32:34 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: The problem with the non-standard compliant behavior of IE in this case is the URI may contain \ (back-slash) as non-hierarchical

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 13.08.2010 15:18, Jay Garcia wrote: --- Original Message --- Try these links in a few browsers: http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images/logo.gif Ok http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images\logo.gif Not Found The requested URL /themes/RavenIce/images\logo.gif was not found on

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 08/13/2010 01:24 PM, Jay Garcia wrote: ... http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images\logo.gif ... Does not work in Firefox, Seamonkey or IE Works in Chromium Epiphany (both linux). Note: you have to modify the '%5C' to '\' when copying from SeaMonkey so that you don't end up testing:

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:32:34 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: The problem with the non-standard compliant behavior of IE in this case is the URI may contain \ (back-slash) as

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 15:18, Jay Garcia wrote: --- Original Message --- Try these links in a few browsers: http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images/logo.gif Ok http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images\logo.gif Not Found The requested URL /themes/RavenIce/images\logo.gif

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 8/13/10 2:27 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 15:18, Jay Garcia wrote: --- Original Message --- Try these links in a few browsers: http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images/logo.gif Ok http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images\logo.gif Not Found The

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 8/13/10 2:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:32:34 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: The problem with the non-standard compliant behavior of IE in this case is

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 13.08.2010 15:56, NoOp wrote: --- Original Message --- On 08/13/2010 01:24 PM, Jay Garcia wrote: ... http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images\logo.gif ... Does not work in Firefox, Seamonkey or IE Works in Chromium Epiphany (both linux). Note: you have to modify the '%5C' to

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 13.08.2010 16:25, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 11:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:32:34 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: The problem with the non-standard compliant

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 13.08.2010 16:27, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 15:18, Jay Garcia wrote: --- Original Message --- Try these links in a few browsers: http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images/logo.gif Ok

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 13.08.2010 18:13, David E. Ross wrote: --- Original Message --- On 8/13/10 2:27 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 15:18, Jay Garcia wrote: --- Original Message --- Try these links in a few browsers: http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images/logo.gif Ok

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 16:27, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 13.08.2010 15:18, Jay Garcia wrote: --- Original Message --- Try these links in a few browsers: http://www.ufaq.org/themes/RavenIce/images/logo.gif Ok

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

JeffM wrote: JeffM wrote: Standards are a Good Thing(tm). Using the W3C Validator on your code is also a Good Thing(tm). The word for those who don't do that is incompetent. Rick Merrill wrote: But that is a totally toothless motto. Sorry. It's the best I have. While I agree with you,

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

David E. Ross wrote: On 8/11/10 2:35 PM, Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 8/11/10 7:47 AM, Ray_Net wrote: http://home.scarlet.be/~pin10521/didyouseethepicture.htm The markup img src=IMAGES\pose-yoga.jpg alt=pose-yoga.jpg has a path to the image with a back-slash (\). That

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 8/12/10 6:45 AM, Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote: No, you have missed at least two points. If the file is on your local PC running Windows, then file:///C:/TEST/didyouseethepicture.htm is the same as file:\C:\TEST\didyouseethepicture.htm Even SeaMonkey recognizes the \ in

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Ray_Net wrote: Therefore SM is wrong when he got a good result No. What is wrong is _trying to interpret **broken** code by **guessing**_. IE is more coherent, he work in all cases. You're very forgiving when applying the word all. The number of cases where Internet Exploder refuses to render

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 07:38:01 -0700, /Rick Merrill/: But that is a totally toothless motto. While I agree with you, the fact is that the non-compliant are getting the money and the competent do not. Case in point: those websites developed with TOOLS that do not adhere to the standards. The

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

David E. Ross wrote: On 8/12/10 6:45 AM, Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote: No, you have missed at least two points. If the file is on your local PC running Windows, then file:///C:/TEST/didyouseethepicture.htm is the same as file:\C:\TEST\didyouseethepicture.htm Even

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 07:38:01 -0700, /Rick Merrill/: But that is a totally toothless motto. While I agree with you, the fact is that the non-compliant are getting the money and the competent do not. Case in point: those websites developed with TOOLS that do not adhere to

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 8/12/10 7:38 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 8/12/10 6:45 AM, Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote: No, you have missed at least two points. If the file is on your local PC running Windows, then file:///C:/TEST/didyouseethepicture.htm is the same as

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:32:34 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: The problem with the non-standard compliant behavior of IE in this case is the URI may contain \ (back-slash) as non-hierarchical separator, therefore IE will incorrectly transform it to a forward slash and result in a

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:45:45 +0200, /Ray_Net/: But The markup img src=IMAGES\pose-yoga.jpg alt=pose-yoga.jpg works with SM when accessing the page in local or on a local webserver. That may be because of your local web server doing the same compensation as IE is doing on the client-side,

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

David E. Ross wrote: someone who thinks that a Web page is okay merely because it looks okay with IE is ignoring at least half of their potential viewers and possibly more than two-thirds of viewers. Yup. *More*. Especially if you're in the 4th most populous nation: :Firefox’s share on many of

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 08/12/2010 07:38 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 8/12/10 6:45 AM, Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote: No, you have missed at least two points. If the file is on your local PC running Windows, then file:///C:/TEST/didyouseethepicture.htm is the same as

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 08/12/2010 04:42 PM, NoOp wrote: ... I agree with David regarding the rfc... however: The link doesn't work with Opera (linux) as well. But it *does* work with Chromium 5.0.375.125 (53311) Ubuntu 10.04 (linux), and Epiphany Web Browser 2.30.2 (linux). Sorry, forgot to mention that

This is not working with SM but OK with IE

http://home.scarlet.be/~pin10521/didyouseethepicture.htm ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 8/11/10 7:47 AM, Ray_Net wrote: http://home.scarlet.be/~pin10521/didyouseethepicture.htm The markup img src=IMAGES\pose-yoga.jpg alt=pose-yoga.jpg has a path to the image with a back-slash (\). That makes the path invalid for something on a Web server. IE interprets this as a

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

David E. Ross wrote: On 8/11/10 7:47 AM, Ray_Net wrote: http://home.scarlet.be/~pin10521/didyouseethepicture.htm The markup img src=IMAGES\pose-yoga.jpg alt=pose-yoga.jpg has a path to the image with a back-slash (\). That makes the path invalid for something on a Web server. IE

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

User wrote: Ray_Net wrote: http://home.scarlet.be/~pin10521/didyouseethepicture.htm It looks to me like there is an error in the code. The slash after IMAGES is incorrect. style=text-align: center;img src=IMAGES\pose-yoga.jpg If you try to go to:

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

Ray_Net wrote: I would not say sloppy because it works in all cases. IE is smart in that case. You misspelled doesn't comply with standards. If every driver got to do it by his own rules, the roads would be a mess. Standards are a Good Thing(tm). Using the W3C Validator on your code is also a

Re: This is not working with SM but OK with IE

On 8/11/10 2:35 PM, Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 8/11/10 7:47 AM, Ray_Net wrote: http://home.scarlet.be/~pin10521/didyouseethepicture.htm The markup img src=IMAGES\pose-yoga.jpg alt=pose-yoga.jpg has a path to the image with a back-slash (\). That makes the path invalid for