Re: [Suspend-devel] Fix platform mode for in-kernel suspend

2006-10-16 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:45:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 16 October 2006 21:21, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:06:07PM +0200, R. J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, 16 October 2006 20:55, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > If nobody obje

Re: [Suspend-devel] Fix platform mode for in-kernel suspend

2006-10-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 16 October 2006 21:21, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:06:07PM +0200, R. J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, 16 October 2006 20:55, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > If nobody objects, i'd send this to LKML: > > > Maybe somebody with a recent -mm kernel can t

Re: [Suspend-devel] Fix platform mode for in-kernel suspend

2006-10-16 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:06:07PM +0200, R. J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 16 October 2006 20:55, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If nobody objects, i'd send this to LKML: > > Maybe somebody with a recent -mm kernel can test if it still applies there > > :-) > > I have a very similar pat

Re: [Suspend-devel] Fix platform mode for in-kernel suspend

2006-10-16 Thread R. J. Wysocki
On Monday, 16 October 2006 20:55, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > Hi, > > If nobody objects, i'd send this to LKML: > Maybe somebody with a recent -mm kernel can test if it still applies there :-) I have a very similar patch, but with two differences, that applies to -mm and has been tested (on one box)

[Suspend-devel] Fix platform mode for in-kernel suspend

2006-10-16 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi, If nobody objects, i'd send this to LKML: Maybe somebody with a recent -mm kernel can test if it still applies there :-) -- Subject: swsusp: fix platform mode Somewhen after 2.6.9, the in-kernel suspend got "incomple

Re: [Suspend-devel] Suspend with cryptsetup encrypted swap?

2006-10-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > is something like this possible? I have here notebook with Fedora Core 5 > with swap encrypted using cryptsetup create. Is it possible to > suspend/resume such notebook with ususpend? Probably yes... Plus ususpend has built-in encryption.

Re: [Suspend-devel] Suspend with cryptsetup encrypted swap?

2006-10-16 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:26:16 +0200 Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > is something like this possible? I have here notebook with Fedora Core > 5 with swap encrypted using cryptsetup create. Is it possible to > suspend/resume such notebook with ususpend? > Dunno much about encrypted

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] Fix handling of large partitions

2006-10-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 16 October 2006 00:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Now I have something in the brown-paper-bag category. > > No, I do not think this is brown-paper-bag category... Yes, go ahead > with commit. 32-bit limitations are stupid/ugly... Committed. -- You never change things by fighti

[Suspend-devel] Suspend with cryptsetup encrypted swap?

2006-10-16 Thread Matej Cepl
Hi, is something like this possible? I have here notebook with Fedora Core 5 with swap encrypted using cryptsetup create. Is it possible to suspend/resume such notebook with ususpend? Thanks a lot, Matěj Cepl -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: ceplmajabber.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 28

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] Fix handling of large partitions

2006-10-16 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Monday 16 October 2006 09:59, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:12:27AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Sunday 15 October 2006 23:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Yeah, mainly because I have no time to learn autoconf. :-) > > > > Oh, so autoconf is ok for this proje

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] Fix handling of large partitions

2006-10-16 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:12:27AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Sunday 15 October 2006 23:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Yeah, mainly because I have no time to learn autoconf. :-) > > Oh, so autoconf is ok for this project? (automake, too?). I'm asking because > some people do no

Re: [Suspend-devel] half success with Dell Inspiron 510m

2006-10-16 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi, On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 01:34:13AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > HI! > > > I have made s2ram and s2disk almost work for Dell Inspiron 510m > > > > # s2ram -i output: > > This machine can be identified by: > > sys_vendor = "Dell Inc." > > sys_product = "Inspiron 510m

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] Fix handling of large partitions

2006-10-16 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 04:00:48PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > (too bad that autoconf isn't used here ;). Disagree. We could do with a small configure script, but autoconf is not the way to go here IMO. -- Stefan Seyfried QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices| "Any ideas, Jo

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] Fix handling of large partitions

2006-10-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > Now I have something in the brown-paper-bag category. > > > > > > Without this patch s2disk on i386 (32-bit in general) doesn't work with > > > swap files placed above 2 GB from the beginning of the partition. I think > > > it'll also have a problem with a swap partition larger than 2 G