Re: [Suspend-devel] another machine for the DB

> I just checked and the machine is already in the whitelist. > What does "s2ram -n" tell you about it? Machine is unknown. This machine can be identified by: sys_vendor = "AVERATEC" sys_product = "1000 Series" sys_version = "To Be Filled By O.E.M." bios_version = "080011 " See

[Suspend-devel] s2ram: success report

Hi, I just wanted to follow your request on for reports of successful use of s2ram. Suspend to RAM worked for me so far without s2ram, too. "s2ram -f" worked here. | $ sudo ./s2ram -i | This machine can be identified by: | sys_vendor = "BENQ" | sys_product

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram on HP Compaq nx7300

On 3/14/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:40:03PM +0100, Valent Turkovic wrote: > > On 3/13/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > I have HP Compaq nx7300 laptop and when I run s2ram I get this: > > > > > > > > # s2ram > > > > M

Re: [Suspend-devel] [patch] move to vbetool-1.0

On Wednesday, 14 March 2007 16:05, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > Hi, > > This patch moves our codebase to vbetool-1.0 (with very minor differences). > It also enables building against either a system-wide installed libx86, or > against a locally copied libx86 tree inside the suspend directory. > > I r

Re: [Suspend-devel] update whitelist

I tried it from console in X. I can try it again from text console (ctrl-alt-f1) when I boot suse up a bit later. On 3/14/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 07:35:51PM +0100, Leszek Kubik wrote: > > Yes, both. KDE buttons "suspend" and "hibernate" works OK. >

Re: [Suspend-devel] update whitelist

On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 07:35:51PM +0100, Leszek Kubik wrote: > Yes, both. KDE buttons "suspend" and "hibernate" works OK. And from a text console (ctrl-alt-f1)? Sorry if i'm being thick here, but this is somehow important :-) -- Stefan Seyfried "Any ideas, John?" "Well, surrounding them's out."

Re: [Suspend-devel] Home desktop computer, S2ram results

On 14/03/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:44:19AM +0100, Slobodan D. Sredojevic wrote: > - s2ram -f -p -s gives screen that is alive but noisy, not readable , > keyboard is working (*) if you press enter, do you get a new prompt and can read stuff you

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram on HP Compaq nx7300

On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:40:03PM +0100, Valent Turkovic wrote: > On 3/13/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > I have HP Compaq nx7300 laptop and when I run s2ram I get this: > > > > > > # s2ram > > > Machine is unknown. > > > This machine can be identified by: > > > s

Re: [Suspend-devel] update whitelist

On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 11:06:27PM +0100, Leszek Kubik wrote: > *Hi, > It works fine with "s2ram -f" on system built from VBI notebook-barebone > EL80 > http://www.intel.com/cd/channel/reseller/emea/eng/283360.htm > > > **# s2ram -i > This machine can be identified by: >sys_vendor = "COMPAL

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram

On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 02:16:59AM -0700, Daniel Wistal wrote: > Dear Sir or Madam, > > I'd like to tell you some information about my suspend-mode, as you wish: > > Machine is unknown. > This machine can be identified by: > sys_vendor = "FUJITSU SIEMENS" > sys_product = "AMILO M

Re: [Suspend-devel] another machine for the DB

On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 11:56:49PM -0400, Jason Hoover wrote: > Hope I'm sending this to the right place. > > I got the following to work with -a 1, without it the cursor vanishes, > -p also works. Otherwise, perfect. > > This machine can be identified by: > sys_vendor = "AVERATEC" > sy

Re: [Suspend-devel] another machine for the DB

On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 11:56:49PM -0400, Jason Hoover wrote: > Hope I'm sending this to the right place. > > I got the following to work with -a 1, without it the cursor vanishes, > -p also works. Otherwise, perfect. > > This machine can be identified by: > sys_vendor = "AVERATEC" > sy

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram on a HP/Compaq nc4400

On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 11:57:28PM +0100, René Seindal wrote: > Hi, > > I have found out that a HP/Compaq nc4400 can be suspended to ram with > > s2ram -f -p -s > > and revived again. This seems to follow the behaviour of the nc4200 > laptops. > > All other combinations of arguments to s2ram

Re: [Suspend-devel] [s2ram whitelist] sony vaio gr7k, sz72b/b and ux50

Hi, First: Thanks for reporting the machines (goes to everybody sending in reports ;-) On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 03:12:32PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: > Hello Stefan, > > I've got these 3 laptops to usersuspend with s2ram: > > the GR7K[0] > > sys_vendor = "Sony Corporation" >

Re: [Suspend-devel] Home desktop computer, S2ram results

On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:44:19AM +0100, Slobodan D. Sredojevic wrote: > Hi, > > Here is the result using s2ram with latest vanilla kernel (2.6.21-rc3) under > gentoo (suspend ebuild from bugs.gentoo.org applied), vbetool installed, > I have added init=/bin/bash vga=0 to my bootloader configurati

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PROBLEM WITH] new computer working with s2ram

On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 07:11:51PM +0100, Bo Thysell wrote: > Hi! > > I sent you an email about a month ago about a new computer working with s2ram. > After that I fooled around a bit with the drivers for my graphics card ( ATI > X600] and now s2ram doesn't work anymore, even though I've reverted

Re: [Suspend-devel] possible s2ram bug?

On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:51:18PM -0600, neil verplank wrote: > > Hello all, > > First, I'm responding based on the page on opensuse > (http://en.opensuse.org/S2ram). And I'm responding because under > suse10.1, my laptop went to sleep and woke up just fine, but under suse > 10.2, it no long