[svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-10 Thread renatonow
I just got my updated version of Acrobat Reader 7.0 with third- party addons as Yahoo Toolbar and Photoshop Album. This make me think why don't Adobe distribute SVG Viewer 3+ along with Acrobat Reader 7 so it will reach a massive user base. I can't find a desktop without Acrobat Reader, thi

RE: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer

2005-02-10 Thread jdowdell
At 11:18 AM 2/10/5, Rick Bullotta wrote, in part: > Let's face it - all most of us really need is some relatively > simple vector graphics rendered in our browsers. All of the > exotic filters and transforms and some of the more esoterica > in SVG are in the "nice to have" category. I'd be deliri

Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer

2005-02-10 Thread Robin Berjon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I know that we can achieve rendering of basic SVG instructions in nearly > any browser today, without having to install anything new, as web search > term "actionscript svg" demonstrates. > > I don't know how closely the set of SVG rendering instructions supported by >

Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-10 Thread Jérôme Tricand de la Goutte
Hi Renato, Yes, that's true, it would increase dramaticly the number of desktop with ASV, and it would be very benefic to SVG. But on the other hand, it reminds me the story of an operating system (???) distruting its favorite browser with itsself, reducing dramaticly any concurrent developmen

RE: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-10 Thread Rick Bullotta
ay to achieve broad acceptance. Any one know a timetable for native SVG in Firefox? -Original Message- From: Jérôme Tricand de la Goutte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 10:08 AM To: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribut

Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-10 Thread Rerun
and de la Goutte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 10:08 AM >To: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer >...MASSIVELY !!! > > >Hi Renato, > >Yes, that's true, it would increase dramati

RE: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-10 Thread Randy George
groups.com Subject: Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!! Hi Renato, Yes, that's true, it would increase dramaticly the number of desktop with ASV, and it would be very benefic to SVG. But on the other hand, it reminds me the story of an operating system (???)

RE: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-10 Thread Cor Hofman (SC :)
08 PM To: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!! It certainly seems like Adobe is really pulling back from SVG in a large way. No (visible) significant work in the area in quite some time, marginal interoperability

RE: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-10 Thread Rick Bullotta
day, February 10, 2005 2:07 PM To: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!! Hi, I have been following the SVG discussions for a couple of years now (and an early adopter as well). However the cry out to Adobe for support on

Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-12 Thread Ronan Oger
On Thursday 10 February 2005 18:08, Rick Bullotta wrote: > It certainly seems like Adobe is really pulling back from SVG in a large > way. Rick, I think you're missing the point. It's not the vendors holding things up, it's the W3. The majority of SVG-related roles currently on offer worldwide

Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-12 Thread Ronan Oger
On Thursday 10 February 2005 20:18, Rick Bullotta wrote: > Let's face it - all most of us really need is some relatively simple vector > graphics rendered in our browsers.  All of the exotic filters and > transforms and some of the more esoterica in SVG are in the "nice to have" > category. I'd be

RE: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-12 Thread Rick Bullotta
: Saturday, February 12, 2005 6:16 AM To: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!! On Thursday 10 February 2005 18:08, Rick Bullotta wrote: > It certainly seems like Adobe is really pulling back from SVG in a large > way

Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-12 Thread benamou
- Original Message - From: "Ronan Oger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!! > > On Thursday 10 February 2005 20:18, Rick Bullotta wrote: >> Le

Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-12 Thread Philippe Lhoste
benamou wrote: > From: "Ronan Oger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> ...There *are* standalone, nice, SVGT (and possibly SVGB) browsers >> available >> for all the major platforms including desktop and mobile platforms. > > Free ? > Could you give pointers ? > Thanks > JD There is TinyLine... -- Phili

Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-12 Thread Philippe Lhoste
Ronan Oger wrote: > The majority of SVG-related roles currently on offer worldwide in the places > I > know of are for Adobe. I don't think that it is appropriate to say that Adobe > have 'let go' just because you don't see any new ASV browser. Why, exactly, > would Adobe release a new browser

commercial SVGT browser and sdk - was: Re: [svg-developers] Adobe please distribute SVG Viewer ...MASSIVELY !!!

2005-02-13 Thread Ronan Oger
more information. Cheers, Ronan founding partner, Vectoreal http://www.vectoreal.com On Saturday 12 February 2005 14:14, benamou wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Ronan Oger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 12:19 PM > Subjec