Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Lee K. Seitz
Edward Franks stated: > > I have backups of all my important stuff on high quality CD-Rs, so I'm >pretty safe there. I'm also a sucker for CD-ROM compilations for ease >of installation. I have yet to make serious use of my CD-R drive, sad to say. (However, I actually went through all my

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Jim Leonard
Dan Chisarick wrote: At the hight of my media conversion insanity, I had everything on a 4-port KVM. Now all the old machines are on their own network. I used a P-90 running Windows 98 w/a 5.25" Gateway drive that I sold and later asked for it back (they weren't using it). I also have a CPS Opt

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Jim Leonard
Howard Feldman wrote: So I can still use it as a 5.25" drive, or a 3.5" drive, just not both at the same time. I must open the computer and switch jumpers to get it to work! So in summary, watch out before buying Asus Motherboards!!! (Can anyone list decent contemporary M/B manufacturers whos

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Jim Leonard
Edward Franks wrote: Who needs mo'slo when you can play Ultima 2 in all its CGA glory? ;-) You know, this brings up something that I've always maintained: No matter how convenient an emulator is, or how much it enhances or speeds up a game (ie making the game more 'snappy' because there are n

Re: [SWCollect] "Modern" classics

2004-01-20 Thread Jim Leonard
Marco Thorek wrote: True. It's only that once upon a time the profit didn't matter as much. Yes, but the market was completely different then. There's an interview with Ken Williams on the Roberta Williams collection where he says something to the effect of "In the old days, we all went on picn

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Dan Chisarick
Ok, someone who collects classic games and they're surprised by a 5.25" disk? They got the "shame on me" part right, but have no right being upset at you, and doubly so for not talking to you first. At the hight of my media conversion insanity, I had everything on a 4-port KVM. Now all the old m

Re: [SWCollect] "Modern" classics

2004-01-20 Thread Dan Chisarick
The fortunate upside is that the Internet makes self-publication a possibility. I'm not sure how many people can make a living selling games online, but I imagine Malinche does OK for itself. Every now and then someone tries remaking a classic, but with a little 'modernization' that makes it

Re: [SWCollect] "Modern" classics

2004-01-20 Thread Marco Thorek
Jim Leonard schrieb: > > It's not the calculators: It's what makes money. You shouldn't be scared > that accountants and suits are ruining the industry; instead, you should be > scared that the core sales of most computer and console gaming are the way > they are. It is a hard pill to swallow t

Re: [SWCollect] ZorkQuest #2

2004-01-20 Thread Marco Thorek
Edward Franks schrieb: > > Shhh! I was hoping to keep that one secret! ;-) (Like that's going > to happen with this group of eagle-eyed collectors...) Hell yeah, already saw Stuart's auction days ago and kept an eye on it to see for how much it'll go ;-) BTW, there sure is a flurry of

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread AvatarTom
In a message dated 01/20/2004 12:27:35 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I got no response. Did I do something wrong here? More generally, what is the opinion of the people on this list regarding a game that came in two versions: one on 5.25 inch disks and one on 3.5 inch disks?

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Marco Thorek
Edward Franks schrieb: > > It is going to get even worse. My current motherboard doesn't even > support a B: drive! As I need the 3.5 inch drive as my A: drive this > means I'll need to keep an older PC around just to deal with 5.25 > floppies. But how many people have room or even want

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Edward Franks
On Jan 20, 2004, at 3:35 PM, Jim Leonard wrote: Edward Franks wrote: It is going to get even worse. My current motherboard doesn't even support a B: drive! What motherboard? Asus P4C800 Deluxe. When I updated my PC this summer I went for one of the 800 MHz front side bus motherboards. No

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Howard Feldman
Myself, I've still got a handy Teac 'combo' 3.5/5.25 drive which I picked up maybe 5 years ago for about $50. It worked great and only needed a floppy cable with a single connector, and even supports swapping drive A and B with jumpers (if the BIOS doesnt allow this). So you can imagine how p

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Edward Franks
On Jan 20, 2004, at 2:48 PM, Lee K. Seitz wrote: [Snip] On this list or in the general population? 8) I think you'll find most of this list has some older hardware tucked away for just such occasions. I was mainly thinking of the average gamer. For people like us I take it as a given we have mu

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Jim Leonard
Lee K. Seitz wrote: I'm curious, though. How many people here with older hardware keep it set up all the time, network it with their current systems, and/or use KVM switches to reduce the clutter? I have a "worktable" that I use for building/repairing stuff, and that's where the 286 sits along wi

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Jim Leonard
Per-Olof Karlsson wrote: I recently built a new machine and attempted to get an old dual drive like this working but couldn't :-( Light was constantly on, like the cable was bad. I'll try again. That does sound like a bad cable, or even a good cable turned 180 degrees. Bad cable. Turned it 1

RE: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Feldhamer, Stuart
Actually, I realized that I accidentally already gave out enough info to figure out who I'm talking about. The person is a fairly high profile trader on gametz, but he deals mostly in CD-ROM games. The game in question was (don't cringe, C.E.) Leather Goddesses of Phobos 2. Stuart -Original

RE: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Per-Olof Karlsson
>I recently built a new machine and attempted to get an old dual drive >like this working but couldn't :-( Light was constantly on, like the >cable was bad. I'll try again. That does sound like a bad cable, or even a good cable turned 180 degrees. - Peo

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Jim Leonard
Lee K. Seitz wrote: I would hope anyone interested in vintage games would be knowledgable enough about the item(s) they want to know what format(s) it was available on and ask if they knew it came on more than one. It was very rude for them to give you negative feedback without e-mailing you first

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Jim Leonard
Edward Franks wrote: It is going to get even worse. My current motherboard doesn't even support a B: drive! What motherboard? > As I need the 3.5 inch drive as my A: drive this Do you really? While I get nervous thinking about not having a floppy drive in my machine, it is entirely poss

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Jim Leonard
Per-Olof Karlsson wrote: There used to be floppy drives you could connect to the parallel port.. Try looking for one of these, I'm sure they'll work just fine even today. :) Not for the copy-protection on older games, they won't... -- Jim Leonard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) World's largest electronic gamin

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Jim Leonard
Feldhamer, Stuart wrote: "The value of a 5.25 set is considerably less than 3.5s." ..to HIM, because he only wanted to play the game. Not to collectors. Read on: What is the opinion of the people on this list regarding a game that came in two versions: one on 5.25 inch disks and one on 3.5 inch

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread hughfalk
As, poeple have already mentioned, 3.5" may be more useful, but it's obvious that 5.25" is more "valuable." Look at the games that sell for the most on eBay (we're talking $500 - $2000 range). They're all 5.25" or cassette. Ask the guy if he has a cassette drive :-). Hugh -Original Mess

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Lee K. Seitz
Edward Franks stated: > > It is going to get even worse. My current motherboard doesn't even >support a B: drive! As I need the 3.5 inch drive as my A: drive this >means I'll need to keep an older PC around just to deal with 5.25 >floppies. But how many people have room or even want an

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Lee K. Seitz
Feldhamer, Stuart stated: > >Did I do something wrong here? More generally, what is >the opinion of the people on this list regarding a game that came in two >versions: one on 5.25 inch disks and one on 3.5 inch disks? Are the 3.5 inch >disks more valuable? I don't know that one is more valuable t

RE: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Feldhamer, Stuart
I have been trying to find an external 5.25 drive for use on my laptop for some time. If anyone has a lead on one of these things, please let me know. Thanks, Stuart -Original Message- From: Per-Olof Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL P

RE: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Per-Olof Karlsson
There used to be floppy drives you could connect to the parallel port.. Try looking for one of these, I'm sure they'll work just fine even today. :) There are also quite recent thingies that let you connect a 3.5" drive via USB, could be an alternative too (having a 5.25" internally and a 3.5" via

Re: [SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Edward Franks
On Jan 20, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Feldhamer, Stuart wrote: [Snip] I got no response. Did I do something wrong here? More generally, what is the opinion of the people on this list regarding a game that came in two versions: one on 5.25 inch disks and one on 3.5 inch disks? Are the 3.5 inch disks more

[SWCollect] 5.25s vs. 3.5s

2004-01-20 Thread Feldhamer, Stuart
What do you all think of this: I made a trade with someone on the game trading zone for a particular game. I won't tell you which one so you won't try to figure out who it was. Anyway, I described the condition of the game I was sending in some detail. We made the trade, and then noticed that the

RE: [SWCollect] Only opened slightly for pictures...

2004-01-20 Thread Feldhamer, Stuart
A lot of times when they say that they are lying. I've bought items where it supposedly was just opened to look inside or whatever, and stuff turned out to be missing. Stuart -Original Message- From: Edward Franks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:26 PM To: Sof

[SWCollect] Only opened slightly for pictures...

2004-01-20 Thread Edward Franks
Even I cringed when I read this description: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ViewItem&item=3069631145&category=11030 Given the seller's handle, I was amused by the graded mint scale ('gem mint'), too. Perhaps MobyScale 2.0 could add precious stones as qualifiers for each grade. Di

Re: [SWCollect] ZorkQuest #2

2004-01-20 Thread Edward Franks
On Jan 19, 2004, at 11:21 PM, Jim Leonard wrote: Just saw http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ViewItem&item=3072836862&ssPageName=ADME:B:SS:US:1 on ebay if anyone is interested. This pertains to our "you mean InfoComic #4 is rare?" discussion we had recently. Shhh! I was hoping to keep