> GAcalc.py is a geometric algebra calculator and runs interactively.
> Since you are using ipython it is not needed and should be deleted. I
> do not use interactive python for my work since I don't see how to get
> LaTeX ouput while using it and I almost always want LaTeX output so that
> I can
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:40 PM, llarsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Just to test whether the testing tools were working correctly on my
>> machine, I tried running the test cases under 'sympy/core' for sympy
>> versi
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:04 PM, llarsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any update on how sympy under jython is coming along?
jython now runs sympy:
$ jython
Jython 2.5a3+ (unknown:exported, Nov 12 2008, 11:38:34)
[OpenJDK Server VM (Sun Microsystems Inc.)] on java1.6.0_0
Type "help", "copyright
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:40 PM, llarsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just to test whether the testing tools were working correctly on my
> machine, I tried running the test cases under 'sympy/core' for sympy
> version 0.6.2. This failed. The reulsts are shown at the end of the
> post.
>
> One e
Any update on how sympy under jython is coming along?
-Lance Larsen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
Just to test whether the testing tools were working correctly on my
machine, I tried running the test cases under 'sympy/core' for sympy
version 0.6.2. This failed. The reulsts are shown at the end of the
post.
One error claimed that the 'Singleton' class could not be imported
from 'sympy.core.ba
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 7:52 PM, llarsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I update the code to support the f(x=1, y=2) syntax. However, it
> turned out that there __call__ was already being used. The following
> is the current implementation:
>
>def __call__(self, *args, **removeme):
>re
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:13 PM, llarsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The changes seem to work fine, but some test cases failed... Just
> realized that I may have some python path issues causing my tests to
> give spurious failures. Once I have addressed this and checked tests I
> will give an upd
Did you see the above discussion about how to handle the *args part of
it? I don't think we want to simply pass *args on to self.subs.
Brian
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:13 AM, llarsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oops. Last post got sent before I was finished. Anyway, as I mentioned
> I modifi
Oops. Last post got sent before I was finished. Anyway, as I mentioned
I modified the code to accept the f(x=1,y=2), but the __call__ method
was already a part of the basic class. I modified subs to accept the
syntax f.subs(x=1, y=2) and changed the call function to forward
directly to the subs fu
I update the code to support the f(x=1, y=2) syntax. However, it
turned out that there __call__ was already being used. The following
is the current implementation:
def __call__(self, *args, **removeme):
return Function(self[0])(*args)
I changed the subs method to allow kwargs "def s
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> A while back you showed how to redirect prettyprinter to the print
>>> command so one would not have to change p
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A while back you showed how to redirect prettyprinter to the print
>> command so one would not have to change print to prettyprint to get
>> prettyprint output. I tried you method with latex
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A while back you showed how to redirect prettyprinter to the print
> command so one would not have to change print to prettyprint to get
> prettyprint output. I tried you method with latexprinter but in that
> case it
A while back you showed how to redirect prettyprinter to the print
command so one would not have to change print to prettyprint to get
prettyprint output. I tried you method with latexprinter but in that
case it did not work. How would one redirect latexprinter to print so
one would not have
On Nov 14, 4:53 am, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am a sympy newbie, but I do have some thoughts on this issue. I am
> > not entirely opposed to the new notation, but I think it may be worth
> > consi
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am a sympy newbie, but I do have some thoughts on this issue. I am
> not entirely opposed to the new notation, but I think it may be worth
> considering more...
>
> First, the new syntax is confusing two different thi
17 matches
Mail list logo
