Updates:
Cc: asmeurer
Comment #40 on issue 1694 by ondrej.certik: solve has many issues with
fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694
The patch looks ok to me. Aaron, what do you think?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #41 on issue 1694 by asmeurer: solve has many issues with fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694
It looks good to me. I like the strategy used for checksol(). My only
worry is that it could slow down solve()
Hi,
patch for issue 1694 needs review.
It enhances solver capabilities and fix issues concerning fractions :
ex:
solve(1/x, x)
[]
solve(ln(x)/x, x)
[1]
solve(ln(x)/(x-1), x)
[]
Thanks,
Nicolas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches
to., 01.07.2010 kl. 12.28 -0500, skrev Brian Granger:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Øyvind Jensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com
wrote:
ti., 29.06.2010 kl. 11.26 -0700, skrev Matt Curry:
Hello,
I've been working on implementing Hilbert spaces in SymPy. I have
created/improved two files
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:44 PM, nico nicolas.pource...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
patch for issue 1694 needs review.
It enhances solver capabilities and fix issues concerning fractions :
ex:
solve(1/x, x)
[]
solve(ln(x)/x, x)
[1]
solve(ln(x)/(x-1), x)
[]
Thanks,
Thanks, I replied in
Hi Matthew!
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I posted to report a problem with lambdify and namespaces to the sympy
mailing list a while ago:
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/browse_thread/thread/bb2c16413c49b6f9?fwc=2
but was stirred by
patch for issue 1694 needs review.
It enhances solver capabilities and fix issues concerning fractions :
I would like a chance to review this...I can do so in about 8 hours.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this
Hi,
The problem is that, if I pass a dictionary, and a module, as a
namespace, to sympy lambdify, then I can apparently overwrite the
namespace of a function that has already been instantiated. I
realize that's not very clear, but I hope this script helps to
explain:
n1 = {'f': lambda
Hi,
I just read this:
http://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations
citing: or needed to give someone else administrative control over
one of your repositories,, which is exactly what I want.
I am proposing that we move our official repository to github.
Is anyone against? Technically,
On Jul 2, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
I just read this:
http://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations
citing: or needed to give someone else administrative control over
one of your repositories,, which is exactly what I want.
I am proposing that we move our
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
I just read this:
http://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations
citing: or needed to give someone else administrative control over
one of your
Hello everyone,
I was hoping to get some input on people's thoughts regarding the SymPy
cache. In the branch I have going to remove the old assumption system, I run
into the problem of equations being simplified under a certain set of
assumptions, and then retrieved later on when those
12 matches
Mail list logo
