Status: Accepted
Owner: smichr
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview
New issue 2080 by smichr: WildFunction needs to reference Dummy.dummycount
not Symbol.dummycount
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2080
tiny patch at github/smichr/2080
--
You received this message
certik wants someone to pull from certik:residue:
This is the initial implementation of the residue function.
View Pull Request: http://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/15
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send
Hi,
I have created an account sympy-notification
http://github.com/sympy-notification
and added it to the sympy group, so that whenever someone sends a pull
request, we get an email here into sympy-patches.
Ondrej
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Can you add sy...@googlecode.com to this list too? I actually set it up in
Google Code a long time ago to send updates to this list whenever someone adds
the NeedsReview tag to an issue, but it won't work unless that address can post
to this list.
Aaron Meurer
On Oct 24, 2010, at 12:31 PM,
certik wants someone to pull from certik:special:
The zeros will be needed for the energies of some QM systems.
View Pull Request: http://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/16
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you add sy...@googlecode.com to this list too? I actually set it up in
Google Code a long time ago to send updates to this list whenever someone
adds the NeedsReview tag to an issue, but it won't work unless that
One thing I've liked about wikipedia is the ease at which you can branch off to
look at a topic of interest. I wonder if we might hotlink some of the modules
listed in Features to their corresponding docs page. So if someone were
interested in the geometric algebra, they could easily go to the
Hey!
Recently I added a comment about missing copyright/licensing information
in some files and this stirred up a small discussion on IRC.
Anyway, my proposal was to add following header to all sympy modules:
[snip]
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
package.module
~~
A brief
So, I am opposed to this proposal. I think that such things are a waste of
space, make updating the copyright at the year change more difficult, and, if
they are really long (like they are sometimes) can scare people away from the
source code.
You can also see my and Ondrej's comments on the
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I am opposed to this proposal. I think that such things are a waste of
space, make updating the copyright at the year change more difficult, and, if
they are really long (like they are sometimes) can scare people
Hi,
On 24 October 2010 22:40, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I am opposed to this proposal. I think that such things are a waste
of space, make updating the copyright at the year change more difficult,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 15:25, Priit Laes plaes...@gmail.com wrote:
So why is it needed:
1) Although I cannot find the reference at the moment, a file must
contain copyright notice with licensing information, otherwise it can be
viewed as public domain and thus can be freely relicensed by
I suspected this. So, given this bit of information, what are people's
opinions?
Aaron Meurer
On Oct 24, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 15:25, Priit Laes plaes...@gmail.com wrote:
So why is it needed:
1) Although I cannot find the reference at the moment, a
Hi,
On 10/24/2010 10:44 PM, Mateusz Paprocki wrote:
Hi,
On 24 October 2010 22:40, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz
mailto:ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Aaron S. Meurer
asmeu...@gmail.com mailto:asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I am opposed to this
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Felix Kaiser felix.kai...@fxkr.net wrote:
Hi,
On 10/24/2010 10:44 PM, Mateusz Paprocki wrote:
Hi,
On 24 October 2010 22:40, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I am opposed
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Priit Laes plaes...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
2) Some of the modules already contain the brief description about the
module. Having short description also helps people get a quick grips
about the functionality that's implemented there..
While I agree with the
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 7:19 PM, James Pearson
james.m.pear...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Priit Laes plaes...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
2) Some of the modules already contain the brief description about the
module. Having short description also helps people get a quick
17 matches
Mail list logo
