Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Availability

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 9:23 AM Shivam Sharma wrote: > > Hi, > > I am a Computer Science PhD student working in Computational Geometry. I have > been exploring problems in "exact geometric computation" and had come across > Herbie during my literature survey. I was amused to know that SymPy is

[sympy] GSoC Project Availability

Hi, I am a Computer Science PhD student working in Computational Geometry. I have been exploring problems in "exact geometric computation" and had come across Herbie during my literature survey. I was amused to know that SymPy is implementing a similar functionality through the project "Optimiz

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project: Rebuilding SymPy Gamma using Pyodide

""" Something I would like to know more about is what adding a new feature would look like on the technical side. """ Adding a new feature like a new card could be done entirely in python. The Pyodide coderunner handles the input expression provided by javascript and returns the cards in the form

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project: Rebuilding SymPy Gamma using Pyodide

Thank you Qijia for your reply. SymPy Beta is surely a great project . SymPy Beta was a proof of concept to me, and motivated me to spend time learning Web Development and Pyodide. SymPy Gamma brings the power of SymPy to users without learning the correct Python syntax or the SymPy API. I would

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project: Rebuilding SymPy Gamma using Pyodide

Hi all, Thanks for mentioning SymPy Beta. If I understand correctly, SymPy Gamma's goal is to make SymPy end-user-friendly in a Wolfram|Alpha way, and some of the users (like Aman) may contribute back to SymPy. If I'm allowed to be as ambitious as I choose, SymPy Beta's goal is to be an open so

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project: Rebuilding SymPy Gamma using Pyodide

On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 20:48, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 1:44 PM Oscar Benjamin > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 20:37, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 1:16 PM Oscar Benjamin > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 18:43, Aman Shar

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project: Rebuilding SymPy Gamma using Pyodide

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 1:44 PM Oscar Benjamin wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 20:37, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 1:16 PM Oscar Benjamin > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 18:43, Aman Sharma > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello SymPy community, > > > > I am Am

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project: Rebuilding SymPy Gamma using Pyodide

I would go into more technical details, if you have them, about how things will be implemented. Particularly how the pyodide will work and any challenges there. Something I would like to know more about is what adding a new feature would look like on the technical side. How hard would it be for so

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project: Rebuilding SymPy Gamma using Pyodide

On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 20:37, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 1:16 PM Oscar Benjamin > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 18:43, Aman Sharma > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello SymPy community, > > > I am Aman Sharma (mostlyaman on github). I plan to apply for GSoC 2022 > > > for po

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project: Rebuilding SymPy Gamma using Pyodide

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 1:16 PM Oscar Benjamin wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 18:43, Aman Sharma > wrote: > > > > Hello SymPy community, > > I am Aman Sharma (mostlyaman on github). I plan to apply for GSoC 2022 for > > porting SymPy Gamma to Pyodide. I have used SymPy Gamma countless times

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project: Rebuilding SymPy Gamma using Pyodide

On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 18:43, Aman Sharma wrote: > > Hello SymPy community, > I am Aman Sharma (mostlyaman on github). I plan to apply for GSoC 2022 for > porting SymPy Gamma to Pyodide. I have used SymPy Gamma countless times > during my first year calculus and electrical course. In my opinion,

[sympy] GSoC Project: Rebuilding SymPy Gamma using Pyodide

Hello SymPy community, I am Aman Sharma (mostlyaman on github). I plan to apply for GSoC 2022 for porting SymPy Gamma to Pyodide. I have used SymPy Gamma countless times during my first year calculus and electrical course. In my opinion, SymPy Gamma is an incred

[sympy] GSOC Project Idea Discussion

Hi all, I wanted to discuss the project "Polynomial GCD" primarily focussing on improving sparse polynomial gcd by adding variants of PRS algorithm for sparse polynomial representation discussed in Improving sparse polynomial gcd #23131 . I have alre

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Idea discussion

It's currently an open question as to what the scope of the crypto module should be, or if it should even be included in SymPy at all. See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/18269. I would not recommend making a GSoC proposal about cryptography for SymPy given the status of the module. Aaron Me

[sympy] GSoC Project Idea discussion

First and Foremost, cryptocurrency is based on Blockchain. Decentralised and Stuff like Ethereum,Bitcoin etc possesses huge potential in the future. Successful currencies have six key attributes— divisibility, utility, transportability, durability. The cryptocurrency bitcoin has value because i

[sympy] GSOC Project Idea Discussion

Hello, I saw the project "Implementation of tensor math i.e. relativity, electromagnetism, fluid" under Linear Algebra: Tensor Core section. I am interested to implement tensor math relativity and electromagnetism. So can I think of this project to apply for GSOC'21? Thank you, Parnabrita M

[sympy] GSoc Project Idea Discussion

Hello mentors, can you please let me know if #20391 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/20391 be implemented as a GSoC project?? I am really interested in implementing this (Linear programming with simplex method). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Idea Discussion

> How much do you actually need to understand of the theory to make it work? Sure, you could just implement it based on the maple code from Smith's thesis, that's how I started with my implementation. Most of what you need to do in practice is a lot of manipulation of the analytic solution of

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Idea Discussion

> I wouldn't say that I know differential Galois theory but reading > Kovacic's paper and also the Smith paper linked above I thought that I > was able to follow the algorithm itself and how to implement it. To me > it looked as if differential Galois theory was needed for the proofs > but not for

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Idea Discussion

Hi Nijso, Thank you for the suggestions. Even I have found the Kovacic Algorithm to be difficult to understand since I'm not familiar with differential galois groups. > You can also start by writing a solver for first order rational Riccati ODEs, because Kovacic' method is basically telling y

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Idea Discussion

On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 15:23, nijso.be...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi, Hi Nijso, > I implemented the Lie method for second order ODEs in the maxima cas. The > code for maxima is here : > > https://github.com/bigfooted/maxima-odesolve > > specific jupyter doc for ode2_lie (best viewed with nbviewer)

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Idea Discussion

Hi, I implemented the Lie method for second order ODEs in the maxima cas. The code for maxima is here : https://github.com/bigfooted/maxima-odesolve specific jupyter doc for ode2_lie (best viewed with nbviewer): https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/bigfooted/maxima-odesolve/blob/master/Doc/ode2_

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Idea Discussion

On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 at 15:39, Naveen Saisreenivas Thota wrote: > > > There are simpler and more useful algorithms that have not yet been > > implemented in sympy. In particular the Kovacic algorithm gives > > solutions for a useful and commonly occurring class of ODEs: > > For Kovacic's Algorithm,

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Idea Discussion

> It is polite to give links to what you are referring to rather than > expecting others to go look it up: Sorry about that. I will include links in the future. > There are simpler and more useful algorithms that have not yet been > implemented in sympy. In particular the Kovacic algorithm gives

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Idea Discussion

On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 at 14:27, Naveen Saisreenivas Thota wrote: > > Hi all, > > I wanted to discuss the project "Integrating factors for second order ODEs". > First off, is the paper too big for a GSoC project this year since the time > limit is reduced? If not, even parts of the paper can be imp

[sympy] GSoC Project Idea Discussion

Hi all, I wanted to discuss the project "Integrating factors for second order ODEs". First off, is the paper too big for a GSoC project this year since the time limit is reduced? If not, even parts of the paper can be implemented. I have already gone through the paper, and I have some doubts r

Re: [sympy] GSOC project ideas

Hi! Thank you for your coments. > > > Support symbolic expressions of density function that implement the > covariance matrix. > Can you provide some examples for this idea. > If we have a normal multinomial random variable X = (X1, X2), with covariance matrix Σ and mean μ, a symbolic ex

Re: [sympy] GSOC project ideas

Hi, > Use matrices modules to perform some basic operations for the multivariate rv's, for example we could use the eigen module to perform Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis. This needs more thought and we should check for feasibility before moving forward with PCA and

Re: [sympy] GSOC project ideas

Hi! I am working on my application and i was thinking of ways to extend the support of multivariate distributions. For example: 1. Add more matrices support. a. Use matrices modules to perform some basic operations for the multivariate rv's, for example we could use the eigen m

Re: [sympy] GSOC project ideas

Hi, As far as I know, the "Probability" project is available for GSoC, 2020. Please let me know of any questions regarding GSoC projects related to `stats` module. Best wishes. On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 1:06 AM Basilis Kalos wrote: > Hi all > > > The first project that i’m most interested to

[sympy] GSOC project ideas

Hi all The first project that i’m most interested to work on is the “Optimize floating point expressions”. I am familiar with Herbie and I have started reading its source code with the purpose of adapting ideas and even code (after re-writing it in python). How does that sound? I als

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project | Discussion | Implementation of Functors in the Category Theory module

Any help/views/suggestions on the above discussion would be greatly appreciated. Thanks and regards, Vatsal. On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, 03:13 Vatsal Srivastava, wrote: > Typo: we *need not* provide the functor the explicit map, but just the > field and the set S. > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, 03:11 Vatsal

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project | Discussion | Implementation of Functors in the Category Theory module

Typo: we *need not* provide the functor the explicit map, but just the field and the set S. On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, 03:11 Vatsal Srivastava, wrote: > But just like you correctly pointed out, the code does not support > infinite categories. Regardless, why not just have an unevaluated object to > ac

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project | Discussion | Implementation of Functors in the Category Theory module

But just like you correctly pointed out, the code does not support infinite categories. Regardless, why not just have an unevaluated object to accommodate for the potentially infinite categories, and a derived class for the finite ones? The reason why I think the latter is important, is because the

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project | Discussion | Implementation of Functors in the Category Theory module

I think it would be more useful to represent functors as unevaluated objects. That way, you can manipulate them on abstract category objects, which may actually represent infinite categories. See also this issue https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/17964 Aaron Meurer On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 6:37

[sympy] GSoC Project | Discussion | Implementation of Functors in the Category Theory module

Hi, I've been reading the category theory module, and I found that functors have not been implemented yet. I propose to do this during Phase 1 of the GSoC project. I was wondering if we should implement it as simply an object that stores two dicts, one would be a map between objects of two catego

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with Python" discussion.

The idea behind this topic would be to profile the physics.vector and physics.mechanics codebases using non-trivial problems, then implement more efficient algorithms where needed. No knew dynamics algorithms are likely needed and most speeds up might result in work with the matrix module. Skills n

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 21:19, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > I agree. The biggest challenge with symbolic matrices is expression > blow up. In some cases it is unavoidable, for instance, symbolic > eigenvalues/eigenvectors use the symbolic solutions to polynomials, > which are complicated in the general

RE: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient EquationofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

About sorting: Python is made such that it automatically shifts it’s algorithm according to list size. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Shiksha Rawat Sent: 30 March 2019 01:30 To: sympy Subject: Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient EquationofMotionGenerationwith Python"

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

I have added case study for the performance issue i am working on. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2019-Application-SHIKSHA-RAWAT-:-Benchmarks-and-performance Please review the proposal and suggest changes. I have not completed the implementation plans. But i will add that part too by ton

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

I am currently trying to improve the performance in the PR https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/16509 To complete my gsoc proposal should i write the way i am trying to improve the performance and how i have planned to proceed ? Because the idea of benchmarking and performance mainly involves tryi

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

Okay, i have continued the discussion on the issue itself. On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 12:06 AM Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 12:07 PM Shiksha Rawat > wrote: > > > > Thank you for the replies. > > > > As suggested by Aaron , I figured out ways to fix the performance of > https://git

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 12:07 PM Shiksha Rawat wrote: > > Thank you for the replies. > > As suggested by Aaron , I figured out ways to fix the performance of > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/16249. > One of the easy way is to disable _find_localzeros > The function is creating a set of non

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

Thank you for the replies. As suggested by Aaron , I figured out ways to fix the performance of https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/16249. One of the easy way is to disable _find_localzeros The function is creating a set of non-minimal(non-maximal) numbers and to identify these it is making comp

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

We have a benchmark repository that is run periodically: https://github.com/sympy/sympy_benchmarks I recommend starting there. You can find a number of regressions that can be investigated. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 5:17 PM Aaron Meurer wrote: > I agree wi

[sympy] Gsoc Project :- "System Dynamics: Bond Graph Tools" discussion

Hi ! I was going through various ways I can provide a GUI for the upcoming Bond Graph Tools project and came across Tkinter- ( https://docs.python.org/2/library/tkinter.html),( https://docs.python.org/2/library/tkinter.html). Wondering if this can be used? We can make something like a grid with

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

I agree with Oscar. I would also add that it's usually not trivial to determine where the bottlenecks are in SymPy. So I would write more about how you intend to profile the code. Perhaps it would be useful to take an existing thing that is slow in SymPy (you can use the performance issue label as

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

This looks like good work to do. I don't know how these applications are evaluated but my thought if I was reviewing this would be that it seems quite vague. This would probably be a more enticing proposal if it had some specific suggestions of changes that would speed things up. I can tell you no

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2019-Application-SHIKSHA-RAWAT-:-Benchmarks-and-performance I have designed a proposal for Benchmarks and Perfromance idea, though it is not complete yet. Can Jason Moore, Aaron and Oscar please review that and suggest changes? On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

I did further digging on the idea mentioned by Jason Moore. *Figuring out the main bottlenecks for sympy *: The best way to figure out these bottlenecks would be to designing a typical problem for each module for example mass spring damper for physics and computing time taken by sympy to give the

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project :- "System Dynamics: Bond Graph Tools" discussion

Hello everyone, Can I get some feedback about this? Especially from the mentors? Thank you. On Sat, 16 Mar 2019, 11:20 Arooshi Verma, wrote: > Hello, > I am Arooshi Verma from IIT Bhubaneswar,India. I have already started > contributing to Sympy. I have been among the top in my engineering >

[sympy] GSOC project on vector integration

Current status - sympy.vector only implements vector differentiation Hi, I wanted to implement vector integration over lines surfaces and volumes. Below are the attached links and references to implement the idea. 1) https://www.physics.nus.edu.sg/~phylimhs/LineSurfVolInt2.pdf 2) https://www.g

[sympy] Gsoc Project :- "System Dynamics: Bond Graph Tools" discussion

Hello, I am Arooshi Verma from IIT Bhubaneswar,India. I have already started contributing to Sympy. I have been among the top in my engineering mechanics class. Moreover, I have qualified a lot of Physics and Mathematics Olympiads. After going through the Gsoc ideas page, I got particularly int

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

I am really interested in taking up that idea. Can you suggest where or how should I start from because up till now I was just focusing on the physics module and benchmarks related to it? I am still trying to find how could we optimize matrix operations. On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 8:46 PM Jason Moor

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

The mechanics speedup idea is really just a narrow version of the profiling and benchmarking idea (focuses on just a couple of packages). Maybe a proposal that focuses on figuring out the main bottlenecks for sympy, creating benchmarks for them, and then improving performance is a good proposal ide

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

I agree. The biggest challenge with symbolic matrices is expression blow up. In some cases it is unavoidable, for instance, symbolic eigenvalues/eigenvectors use the symbolic solutions to polynomials, which are complicated in the general case for n > 2. One thing I meant by "overhead" is that if t

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

(Replying on-list) On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 20:37, Alan Bromborsky wrote: > > Since most pc these days have multiple cores and threads what not use > parallel algorithyms. For honesty I must state I have a vested interest > since I have a pc with a threadripper cpu with 16 cores and 32 threads. P

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

ince currently I am having my mid sems. I will respond >> asap once I read it. >> >> >> >> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for >> Windows 10 >> >> >> >> *From: *Jason Moore >> *Sent: *14 March 2019 22

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

>> >> >> >> From: Jason Moore >> Sent: 14 March 2019 22:56 >> To: sympy@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation >> ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion. >> >> >> >>

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

*To: *sympy@googlegroups.com > *Subject: *Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation > ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion. > > > > Work to speed up matrix algorithms given assumptions on matrices would > help. > > > > Jason > > moorepa

RE: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.

Give me 2 days since currently I am having my mid sems. I will respond asap once I read it. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Jason Moore Sent: 14 March 2019 22:56 To: sympy@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGenerationwith Python"

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

>>> >>> >>> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for >>> Windows 10 >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *Shiksha Rawat >>> *Sent: *14 March 2019 18:49 >>> *To: *sympy >>> *Subject: *R

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

ng it better than me. >> >> >> >> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for >> Windows 10 >> >> >> >> *From: *Shiksha Rawat >> *Sent: *14 March 2019 18:49 >> *To: *sympy >> *Subject: *Re: [sympy] Gsoc Projec

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

> > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > > *From: *Shiksha Rawat > *Sent: *14 March 2019 18:49 > *To: *sympy > *Subject: *Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation > ofMotionGeneration with Pyth

RE: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation ofMotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

Well, I can’t say much because I ‘m not a maths student and just study maths because I like doing so. In this case you would be knowing it better than me. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Shiksha Rawat Sent: 14 March 2019 18:49 To: sympy Subject: Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Effi

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of MotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

Yes, I have studied group theory in my college curriculum. I tried to find ways by which group theory cap to used to simplify matrix multiplication and came across https://web.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/Available/etd-012318-234642/unrestricted/zli.pdf and http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/viola/classes/gems-08/lec

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of MotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

Well if you see these algorithms are not for general purpose matrices but for where high accuracy is required. I would rather say to use concepts of group theory and representation theory (i do not have lot of knowledge about this but 'm studying) which can reduce matrices to lower dimensions.If yo

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of MotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

I think you are confused with numpy and scipy.I don't think the algorithm mentioned by you is much helpful to this cause. Could you please check out some more algorithm for the same. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of MotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

ngla < >>> manglavishes...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Well, representation theory is a part of mathematics which maps a >>>> matrix to a small representation which is easily computable than those big >>>> matrix. This is also re

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of MotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

plication and strassen’s algo can be used for reducing complexity from >>> n^3 to n^1.52. >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for >>> Windows 10 >>> >>> >>> >&g

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of MotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

gt; >> >> >> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for >> Windows 10 >> >> >> >> *From: *Jason Moore >> *Sent: *12 March 2019 01:26 >> *To: *sympy@googlegroups.com >> *Subject: *Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of MotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

> > > > *From: *Jason Moore > *Sent: *12 March 2019 01:26 > *To: *sympy@googlegroups.com > *Subject: *Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of > MotionGeneration with Python" discussion. > > > > > moorepants.info > +01 530-601-9791 >

RE: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of MotionGeneration with Python" discussion.

from n^3 to n^1.52. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Jason Moore Sent: 12 March 2019 01:26 To: sympy@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of MotionGeneration with Python" discussion. moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 a

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with Python" discussion.

moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:44 AM Shiksha Rawat wrote: > Hello, > > I am Shiksha , a second-year undergrad from India. I have been > contributing to Sympy for more than a month now. While going through Gsoc > Ideas page, I found Efficient Equation of Motion Gene

[sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with Python" discussion.

Hello, I am Shiksha , a second-year undergrad from India. I have been contributing to Sympy for more than a month now. While going through Gsoc Ideas page, I found Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with Python

[sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with Python" discussion.

Hello, I am Shiksha , a second-year undergrad from India. I have been contributing to Sympy for more than a month now. While going through Gsoc Ideas page, I found Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with Python interesting.I had a subject

[sympy] GSoC project idea

Hello everyone I wanted to ask that is there any chance that some topics in physics like Electrostatics, magnetism, etc and their theorems like as gaussian theorem, ampere circuital law and more theorems related to these topics can be implemented in this year's GSoC? -- You received this messa

[sympy] GsOC project- pattern matching with matchpy

Hello, I am Aditya Dokhale, a sophomore from IIT (BHU), Varanasi , I came across Sympy recently and I would really like to contribute in it. I am very passionate about mathematics and coding and I am well versed in python, C and C++. This Idea seems very fascinating and intriguing to me and i w

[sympy] GSoC project: Assumptions :: Need opinions

Although I've already submitted the proposal for project, can I please have some opinions on the proposal for assumptions? I am working full time on SymPy since Feb 14 since I knew if I had to take up Assumptions as my project, it'd not be easy if I'm going to lack dedication. Given the underst

[sympy] GSOC Project Feedback: Autolev Parser

Hi everyone! My name is Mariah and I'm a new to the world of computer science! Any and all feedback is welcome! I will post it to the wiki shortly. A pdf version is also attached to this post. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-jakoA7sswGJ090WWPG_AAbO-ThAEFBxfHbPyOF7mrs/edit?usp=sharing Than

Re: [sympy] GSoC project idea: Integration of homogeneous functions over polytopes

I am facing difficulty in understanding the method properly I would really appreciate it if someone can explain it to me through an example. I really need to understand it first before I can implement it. Especially equation (3). Also, can I use parts of the poster in my proposal? @nsukumar I would

Re: [sympy] GSOC Project 2017: Solvers

Ekansh, I think the methods you mention are numerical in nature. Unless they can be used with symbols you'll need to look into other methods. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Ekansh Purohit wrote: > Hi, > > I am Ekansh Purohit, a second year undergrad o

[sympy] GSOC Project 2017: Solvers

Hi, I am Ekansh Purohit, a second year undergrad of International Institute of Technology, Hyderabad and i am interested in doing GSOC this year under Sympy. I went through the ideas page and found the Solvers: Transcendental Equations project quite interesting. I have been using and contributi

Re: [sympy] GSOC Project: Expand the number theory class

That's great, thanks! On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 10:00:55 PM UTC-5, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > This sounds good. At this point, I would recommend starting work on > your patch requirement. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Cho Yin Yong > wrote: > > I would prioritise mysel

Re: [sympy] GSOC Project: Expand the number theory class

This sounds good. At this point, I would recommend starting work on your patch requirement. Aaron Meurer On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Cho Yin Yong wrote: > I would prioritise myself with the Quadratic Sieve, as it is more practical > (fastest general method for digits under 100 decimal places

Re: [sympy] GSOC Project: Expand the number theory class

I would prioritise myself with the Quadratic Sieve, as it is more practical (fastest general method for digits under 100 decimal places). This is indeed an ambitious project, however, I've gained a head start with the mathematical side of these algorithms, having researched on RSA, and Fermat's

Re: [sympy] GSOC Project: Expand the number theory class

On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 12:23:30 AM UTC+2, Cho Yin Yong wrote: > > The algorithms currently implemented have the following best case > scenarios for factorizing: > > - Fermat's Test (When two prime numbers are close to each other) > - Pollard's Rho (When one prime factor is much smaller th

Re: [sympy] GSOC Project: Expand the number theory class

The algorithms currently implemented have the following best case scenarios for factorizing: - Fermat's Test (When two prime numbers are close to each other) - Pollard's Rho (When one prime factor is much smaller than the other) - Pollard's p-1 (p&q are prime factors -> p-1 divisble by r!, q-1 no

Re: [sympy] GSOC Project: Expand the number theory class

I'm not too familiar with number theory algorithms. How would these methods compare to the ones that are already implemented? Aaron Meurer On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Cho Yin Yong wrote: > I am extremely intrigued to work with SymPy for the upcoming Google Summer > of Code. I have particula

[sympy] GSOC Project: Expand the number theory class

I am extremely intrigued to work with SymPy for the upcoming Google Summer of Code. I have particular interest in number theory and its methods for semiprime factorization. Right now, sympy has pho rollard, pho's p-1 and fermat's test for semiprime factorization. http://docs.sympy.org/dev/_modu

[sympy] GSoC Project: Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with Python

Hi developers, I'm a third year undergraduate student at IIT Kharagpur, I've been involved with SymPy development for quite some time now. I went through the ideas page and found the project "Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with Python" intriguing. Do we have potential mentor(s) for th

[sympy] GSOC Project: Singularty Solver and Solverset

Hi, I am Devee Prasad Mohapatra I will be GSOC applicant this year. I am currently pursuing my b.tech in IIIT Bhubaneswar. I have good proficiency in python and c programming language. Mathematics as a subject interests me a lot. I am, a beginner to be frank and any advice on how to proceed and

Re: [sympy] GSOC Project

Hi, > can anybody help me how can i start? Read the literature on the Karr Algorithm. There is not so much. You can start with the two original papers by M. Karr. Burcin Erocal's thesis contains also a good introduction. Get familiar with the core ideas on difference algebra. Ping me in irc

[sympy] GSOC Project

Hello i am jigar mistry. I want to implement following module during gsocConcrete module: Implement Karr algorithm, a decision procedure for symbolic summation can anybody help me how can i start? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To u

[sympy] GSoC Project - Improved ODE Solver

I am facing a bit of trouble in understanding what the sixth heuristic in my GSoC project actually means. I've written a detailed blogpost on the algorithm that I've implemented for the fifth heuristic, and the problems that I'm facing in the fifth and sixth heuristic. It would be nice if someo

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project 2013

Last year, there was an idea regarding sympy-bot. I guess it wasn't actually on the ideas page, but it probably should be. There's also the whole issue with http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3445. Aaron Meurer On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Stefan Krastanov wrote: > Hi, > > The

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project 2013

Hi, There are a couple of ideas that were mentioned that deal more with infrastructure (testing, docs, presentation, bug tracking, etc) so a project along these is quite possible. Check out the wiki pages with suggested ideas for more details. In any case, be aware that we request a patch from al

[sympy] Gsoc Project 2013

Hi, I want to apply for Gsoc this year and am searching for some projects which best suites my skills. I have good knowledge of python, unittest framework and pytest. Is there anything related to automated testing such as writing or improving tests in sympy? Kindly give your valuable suggestion

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Related Discussion CC-ed to the List -- OK?

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > Absolutely.  The more discussion that happens publicly (i.e., on the > list, or the issue tracker/pull requests), the better, because then > the community will be involved in the project and can give any > additional input that they may have

Re: [sympy] GSoC Project Related Discussion CC-ed to the List -- OK?

Absolutely. The more discussion that happens publicly (i.e., on the list, or the issue tracker/pull requests), the better, because then the community will be involved in the project and can give any additional input that they may have (and it will also make it easier to track your progress through

  1   2   >