On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Sachin Joglekar
wrote:
> Hello again.
> Jason and I had a talk about this a few days back, and we agreed that it
> would be better if, according to your original plan, your proposal would
> focus on-
> 1) Improving the sympy.physics.vector module with the function
Hello Sachin,
I have my mid-semester exams going on. Right now, I have very limited time
to spend on this. I'll definitely get back to you after my exams.
I look forward to work with you.
Thanks.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Sachin Joglekar
wrote:
> Hello again.
> Jason and I had a talk a
Hello,
I'd like to know which one of the two paths that Jason mentioned, is more
useful for the project. It'll help me choose the right path and start work.
I need feedback and guidance to start work on this.
I have my exams coming up in a few days. I'll get back to work after that.
Thanks.
O
Hello Alan,
I don't understand what you mean.
I mean to say, sympy must be able to symbolically convert a surface
integral into volume integral(vice versa) using divergence theorem(line
integral to area integral using stokes theorem). In this case, I'm talking
about prasoon's vector module. Using
What do you mean in regard to divergence theorem, and stokes theorem
being supported. In the multiple integral section docs for sympy
definite multidimensional integrals are only supported on rectangular
integration ranges. That is limits of integration are independent of
each other along each
Hello Sachin,
In addition to the features you have mentioned, (vector integration is
implemented in prasoon's PR),
I think divergence theorem, and stokes theorem must also be supported.
Also, a module for solving/simplifying vector equations might also help.
[support for BAC-CAB rule, div of curl,
Here is an example of a math heavy page I wrote in with rst + Sphinx:
https://raw2.github.com/moorepants/dissertation/master/eom.rst
:math:`...` is the same as \(...\) or $...$
and
.. math:: gives you the amsmath align environment.
It worked out pretty well, ended up with a nice html and latex
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Alan Bromborsky wrote:
> On 02/17/2014 10:46 AM, Jason Moore wrote:
>
> Another approach would be to write a traditional vector calculus module that
> uses the geometric algebra package in the background. I don't know enough
> about geometric algebra to know if th
On 02/17/2014 10:46 AM, Jason Moore wrote:
Another approach would be to write a traditional vector calculus
module that uses the geometric algebra package in the background. I
don't know enough about geometric algebra to know if that is actually
possible. But maybe. Alan could probably comment.
Another approach would be to write a traditional vector calculus module
that uses the geometric algebra package in the background. I don't know
enough about geometric algebra to know if that is actually possible. But
maybe. Alan could probably comment.
The sympy.physics.vector module can be improv
If a new Vector module is made for sympy, it might increase the problem of
distributed vector,tensor,matrices,diff geom,geom algebra problem. [
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Linear-Algebra-Vision]. I guess the
problem pointed out by this wiki page will increase. The vector algebra
we'll need
I looked into Prasoon's work.
He has provided support for Spherical, cylindrical and rectangular
coordinate systems.
I'd like to know why Prasoon's work was not merged into sympy.
What are the bugs or potential problems of his work?
Are there any issues to be addressed in his work?
Thanks.
On
Hello Jason,
Thanks for your inputs.
I'm looking into both prasoon's work and the geometric algebra module.
I believe use of geometric algebra is better as it is more general. But, to
keep it simple, use of conventionally used 3D co-ordinate systems must be
made easier.
What I mean to say is, a
Electrodynamics can be computed with traditional vector calculus or as Alan
shows with newer generalized methods of geometric algebra. Prasoon's work
last year was to develop a general vector calculus package and a then to
make use of this core for the existing mechanics package and the new
electro
Hello,
Can some one brief me about the conflicts caused by the creation of this
module? (Sachin mentioned it).
It'll give me a head start in contributing to this module.
Thank you.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Alan Bromborsky wrote:
> Please note that the geometric algebra module has curl
Hi Sachin,
Some things I'd like to be there in the electrodynamics module:
1. Point Charges, Continuous charge distributions - Electric Field and
Potential
2. Magnetic field - Magnetic Vector Potential
3. Maxwell's Equations
5. Energy, Momentum Conservations - Poynting Vector, Momentum Tensor
6. R
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pulls/prasoon2211
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pulls/srjoglekar246
Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Rajath Shashidhara <
rajaths.raja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jason,
> Where do I find those branches?
>
> Can't find i
Hello Jason,
Where do I find those branches?
Can't find it on github.
On Monday, February 10, 2014 9:59:41 PM UTC+5:30, Jason Moore wrote:
>
> Check out Sachin's work from last year. He has an electrodynamics module
> which is almost complete. Prasoon also has some branches with a vector
> calc
Check out Sachin's work from last year. He has an electrodynamics module
which is almost complete. Prasoon also has some branches with a vector
calculus package which has the functions you are interested in, also with
various coordinate systems. Both of these need work and improvements.
Jason
moo
On 02/10/2014 09:08 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote:
It'd also be nice to have support for cylindrical and spherical
coordinate systems in sympy.
On Monday, February 10, 2014 7:09:44 PM UTC+5:30, Rajath Shashidhara
wrote:
Hello,
I'm interested in implementing electrodynamics in sympy.
20 matches
Mail list logo
