Hello,
I would like to know if it's possible to configure an interface at
runtime to enable wol without rebooting my machine.
I tried to create a link file that has WakeOnLan=magic and did
'networkctl reconfigure ens0' but it doesn't work.
Also is it possible to display the status of wakeup onli
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 7:26 AM Francis Moreau wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> systemd-networkd creates a bridge 'br0':
>
> $ cat /etc/systemd/network/30-br0.network
> [Match]
> Name=br0
>
> [Network]
> DHCP=ipv4
> Domains=~.
>
> The bridge has one sl
Hi,
systemd-networkd creates a bridge 'br0':
$ cat /etc/systemd/network/30-br0.network
[Match]
Name=br0
[Network]
DHCP=ipv4
Domains=~.
The bridge has one slave 'bond0' by default. The bond device is used
to
aggregate my ethernet card and my wifi card (configured by NM).
systemd-resolved is als
Hello,
I was expecting that this function returns all paths where tmpfiles
can be stored but it returns only "/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d".
Why doesn't it return also "/etc/tmpfiles.d" ?
Thanks you
--
Francis
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:12 AM Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:10 AM Francis Moreau
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > During my application update, I want to restart my service which is
> > activated by a socket but want to be sure
Hello,
During my application update, I want to restart my service which is
activated by a socket but want to be sure that no request sent to my
service will be missed. I also want to restart the socket too so
systemd uses the latest version of the socket unit file.
If I restart the socket when th
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 6:35 PM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 17:22 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 18:12 +0100, Francis Moreau wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:43 PM Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2020-11-10 at
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:43 PM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 11:50 +0100, Francis Moreau wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:30 AM Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > On Di, 10.11.20 10:28, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com)
I hope that helps.
Thank you however I don't control the type of the restarted units, it
can be anything,
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:50 AM Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:30 AM Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> >
>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:30 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Di, 10.11.20 10:28, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > After restarting a service with "systemctl try-restart ..." I want to
> > verify that the se
Hello,
After restarting a service with "systemctl try-restart ..." I want to
verify that the service has been restarted.
How can I reliably do this without using the dbus API ?
Thank you
--
Francis
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.fr
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020, 17:46 Francis Moreau wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I want to override /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link so I need
>> to create a file starting with "99-" prefix.
>
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:46 AM Francis Moreau
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I want to override /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link so I need
> > to create a file starting with "99-"
Hello,
I want to override /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link so I need
to create a file starting with "99-" prefix.
This doesn't seem logical to me because the numbers are supposed to
encode the priority however nothing is left to the user if the
defaults used is 99.
I find more logical fo
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:41 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Di, 08.09.20 17:35, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 4:38 PM Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > "React on the socket close?" — Wha
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 4:38 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> "React on the socket close?" — What do you mean by that?
>
I mean if my service explicitly calls close() then systemd could stop
the socket on its side so its are freed until the service is
restarted. I think it is what you described be
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 12:18 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Fr, 04.09.20 21:53, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a service which is activated by a socket unit. When systemd
> > passes the (netlink) socket to my service i
Hi,
I have a service which is activated by a socket unit. When systemd
passes the (netlink) socket to my service it seems that it still keeps
a reference on the socket, at least ss(8) showed this.
Is this expected ? If yes can this be prevented ?
I'm asking because my service may not need the so
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 11:47 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Mi, 06.05.20 23:43, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running systemd v245 (in the host and in the containers) and I
> > have 2 containers whose veth link
Hi,
I'm running systemd v245 (in the host and in the containers) and I
have 2 containers whose veth link is connected to a bridge.
One container named "c1" uses "DHCPServer=yes" and is supposed to
provide an ipv4 address to the second container "c2" but for some
reasons it seems that no DHCP serv
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 10:36 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:26:50AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09:11:19AM +02
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:08 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > you can export and write to a journal file with:
&
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:08 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> you can export and write to a journal file with:
> journalctl -o export ... | /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-journal-remote -o
> /tmp/foo.journal -
> This has the advantage that you can apply any journalctl filter where
> the dots a
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:08 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> journalctl -o export ... | /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-journal-remote -o
> /tmp/foo.journal -
> This has the advantage that you can apply any journalctl filter where
> the dots are, e.g. '-b'.
Thanks !
It's documented in man pa
Hi,
I would like to backup the journal logs for the current boot in a
"raw" format so I can reuse it later with "journalctl
--file=my-backup".
But looking at the different values for "-o" option I can't find the answer.
Could anybody give me some clues ?
Thanks.
--
Francis
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>
> AFAIK, "onboard" and (hotplug) "slot" names are mutually exclusive, so their
> relative ordering isn't that important... but if the firmware marks a device
> as on-board *and* also provides a slot number, then it's more likely tha
Hello,
I have a question regarding the default value of NamePolicy= defined
in 99-default.link.
The value is "NamePolicy=kernel database onboard slot path"
Could someone explain me why "onbard" is preferred over "slot" which
is preferred over "path" ?
Thanks.
--
Francis
___
Hello,
I dont understand .network has [Link] section whereas network device
configuration can also done with .link file.
It seems that there's a overlap... what is the rational here ?
Thank you in advance.
--
Francis
___
systemd-devel mailing list
sys
Hello,
I'm wondering why systemctl has the -H option whereas one can achieve
the same by calling "ssh -- systemctl ...".
Thanks.
--
Francis
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listin
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>
> And where would it get the actual compose definitions from? They have to be
> defined in the keymap itself.
>
on my distro (opensuse Tumbleweed) compose tables and the definition
of the compose key can be found here:
$ ls /usr/share/k
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to figure out how I can configure a compose key for the
>> consoles.
>>
>> I looked at man lo
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how I can configure a compose key for the consoles.
I looked at man localectl and vconsole.conf but haven't found an answer.
Could anybody give me some hints ?
Thanks.
--
Francis
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>> So if 'ro' is used, systemd-firstboot is not working. If it's expected
>> I think it would worth a note in the documentation.
> It's supposed to work, I think. Please open an issue, it'll be better
> tracked there.
>
https://gi
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> It depends on the command-line parameters: 'ro' and 'rw' both work.
> 'rw' is actually recommended if you're using an initramfs.
>
who is recommending 'rw' ?
do you have any pointers ?
> Otherwise, an empty /etc/machine-id may
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:48:03AM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm puzzled about systemd-firstboot service.
>>
>> In my understanding this service is ran only during the fi
Hello,
I'm puzzled about systemd-firstboot service.
In my understanding this service is ran only during the firstboot. The
firstboot condition is detected with the presence of /etc/machine-id
file.
If this file is not present then it's assumed to be a first boot and
systemd-firstboot.service is
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>>
>> So let's take an example. Please note that I'm really not sure what's
>> the expected behavior of sysvinit itself, and finding som
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> And if a service does not have an explicit stop on shutdown/reboot,
> the processes are killed in a final killing spree where there are not
> ordering guarantees.
>
I don't think so.
/etc/init.d/rc5.d/Sxxfoo with or without a counter symli
Hello Michael,
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hm, I've already given you the answer on IRC, so I'm not sure why you
> ask them again.
>
Indee and thank you for that.
But you also told me that /etc/init.d/rc0.d isn't supported by Debian,
and my question is about this ru
Hello,
I'm starring at a chunk of code of the sysv-generator (shown below)
for some while now and I still can't see its purpose.
Here's the code taken from src/sysv-generator/sysv-generator.c:
static int set_dependencies_from_rcnd(const LookupPaths *lp, Hashmap
*all_services) {
[...]
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 08.03.2016 11:33, Francis Moreau пишет:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>> 08.03.2016 11:07, Francis Moreau пишет:
>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Andrei Borzenkov
>
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 08.03.2016 11:07, Francis Moreau пишет:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>> 07.03.2016 10:04, Francis Moreau пишет:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 07.03.2016 10:04, Francis Moreau пишет:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry for the long delay.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Andrei Borzenkov
>> wrote:
>>> 26.02.2016 00:55, Francis Morea
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
> Francis Moreau píše v Po 07. 03. 2016 v 08:04 +0100:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry for the long delay.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <
>> arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote
Hello,
Sorry for the long delay.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 26.02.2016 00:55, Francis Moreau пишет:
>>
>> But now I'm wondering how the following case is handled: a sysinit
>> script "a" has "Required-Start: b". B
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 24.02.16 17:40, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It seems that the unit generator for sysv init scripts translate
>> "Required-Start: X" into "Afte
Hello,
It seems that the unit generator for sysv init scripts translate
"Required-Start: X" into "After=X" native ordering deps only.
I would also have expected it to add the following dependency "Requires=X" too.
What am I missing ?
Thanks.
--
Francis
_
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sun, 22.11.15 15:26, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While rebooting, It seems to me that shutting down services while
>> unmounting some FS at the same time in an unordered
Hi,
While rebooting, It seems to me that shutting down services while
unmounting some FS at the same time in an unordered fashion is not a
good idea since unmounting a FS can happen before a service using this
FS is stopped.
Is this expected ?
Thanks.
--
Francis
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 06.11.15 18:38, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to change the MemoryLimit property of one the service unit
>> running on my system by using 'bus
Hi,
I'm trying to change the MemoryLimit property of one the service unit
running on my system by using 'busctl set-property ...' but getting
the following error :
Property 'MemoryLimit' is not writable.
However using 'systemctl set-property' works as expected.
I thought that 'systemctl set-
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 02.10.2015 19:27, Francis Moreau пишет:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to know if it would be possible to show the git version (the
>> one given by git-describe) when using the systemd binaries with
&g
Hello,
I'd like to know if it would be possible to show the git version (the
one given by git-describe) when using the systemd binaries with
--version option.
That would be specially usefull when the systemd tree used to build
the binary was not a released one.
I'm really not an automake stuff e
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 22.09.15 15:52, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21.09.15 16:50, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > If a unit
On 09/22/2015 03:52 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 21.09.15 16:50, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> If a unit depends on a slice, a Wants=machine.slice is automatically
>> added to the unit constraints.
>>
>> Wh
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:52:05AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:14 AM, David Herrmann
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 22, 201
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:35 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:19 PM, David Herrmann
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Francis Moreau
>>> wro
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:19 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Well during package installation done by the installer, some packages,
>> usually the ones that installs daemons/services, populates
>> /
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:16 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:45 PM, David Herrmann
>> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 20
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:14 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
[...]
>>>
>>
>> But what if the slice fails to start ?
>>
>> Will the unit asking for a specific slice (which fails to start) b
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:45 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I find odd that systemd-firstboot skips root password init if
>> /etc/shadow exists because AFAICS this file is alwa
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:43 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If a unit depends on a slice, a Wants=machine.slice is automatically
>> added to the unit constraints.
>>
>&
Hi,
If a unit depends on a slice, a Wants=machine.slice is automatically
added to the unit constraints.
Why is "Requires=machine.slice" not prefered instead ?
Thanks.
--
Francis
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http:/
Hi,
I find odd that systemd-firstboot skips root password init if
/etc/shadow exists because AFAICS this file is always part of a
minimal rootfs after being setup by an installer. Indeed it's
populated during package installation.
So I can't see a case where systemd-firstboot would prompt for a r
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 18.09.15 14:45, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> > # systemd-run --slice=my-deep-slice.slice -p MemoryLimit=3G /bin/sleep
>> > 9
>> >
>> > It creates the specifi
Hello Lennart,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> B1;4002;0cOn Fri, 18.09.15 14:11, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to understand how cgroup is used by systemd and having the
>> follo
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how cgroup is used by systemd and having the
following behaviour that I don't understand.
I've created a slice "myslice.slice" with this resource constraint
"MemoryLimit=1024" and started it.
I was expecting to find a trace of myslice in /sys/fs/cgroup/memory
folder
On 09/08/2015 07:48 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 08/09/15 13:55, Francis Moreau wrote:
>> On 09/08/2015 12:09 PM, Richard Maw wrote:
>>> I understood that the common configuration for socket activated sshd was to
>>> have a sshd.service for if you want it to alway
On 09/08/2015 12:09 PM, Richard Maw wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:05:05AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
>> On 09/07/2015 11:28 AM, Richard Maw wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
>>>> How is this handled ? Should we put a
On 09/07/2015 11:28 AM, Richard Maw wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
>> How is this handled ? Should we put a big warning in sshd_config to hint
>> user to configure ListenAddress in sshd.socket in the case socket
>> activation is used ?
Hello,
Usually it's possible to specify the listen address a daemon/service
will listen to. For example, sshd has the 'ListenAddress' option that
can be used in its config file (sshd_config) which specifies the local
addresses sshd(8) should listen on.
The same parameter should be defined also in
On 07/03/2015 01:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> B1;4002;0cOn Fri, 03.07.15 13:09, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
>>> That's not an issue really. Since the device will not have any disk
>>> label initially, and thus nothing will make us
On 07/03/2015 12:18 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 03.07.15 11:53, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> On 07/03/2015 11:08 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30.06.15 17:37, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>>
>>
On 07/03/2015 11:08 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 30.06.15 17:37, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a service 'A' which creates a device 'X' and does some
>> configuring of the device. The device is
On 06/30/2015 07:47 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> Options:
>
> - Configure it as part of ExecStart if possible.
I don't see how is this going to help, sorry.
>
> - Configure it using a second .service unit (oneshot), and depend on
> that one.
You meant all services that were depending on the d
Hi,
I have a service 'A' which creates a device 'X' and does some
configuring of the device. The device is created in a 'ExecStart='
directive whereas its configuration happens during 'ExecStartPost='.
But it seems that as soon as the device is seen by systemd, it creates
the corresponding device
On 06/29/2015 10:05 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
[...]
>>
>> service_sigchld_event() {
>> ...
>> } else if (s->control_pid == pid) {
>> ...
>> if (s->control_command &&
>> s->control_command->command_next &&
>>
On 06/28/2015 07:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 28.06.2015 um 19:02 schrieb Francis Moreau:
>> On 06/28/2015 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 28.06.2015 um 12:00 schrieb Francis Moreau:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>&g
On 06/28/2015 07:35 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:02:57 +0200
> Francis Moreau пишет:
>
>> On 06/28/2015 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 28.06.2015 um 12:00 schrieb Francis Moreau:
>>>> Hello,
>>>
On 06/28/2015 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 28.06.2015 um 12:00 schrieb Francis Moreau:
>> Hello,
>>
>> For services with Type=Forking, I'm wondering if systemd proceeds
>> starting follow-up units when the command described by ExecStart=
Hello,
For services with Type=Forking, I'm wondering if systemd proceeds
starting follow-up units when the command described by ExecStart= exits
or when the one described by ExecStartPost= exits ?
I tried to read the source code to figure this out and it *seems* that
the latter is true but I'm r
Hi,
I'm setting up an encrypted device at boot using cryptsetup. This device
is formatted at each boot (I'm using 'tmp' option in /etc/crypttab).
Also this device is mounted at boot time (a corresponding entry in
/etc/fstab has been made) and is also fsck'ed (fs_passno=2).
However it seems that
On 06/12/2015 06:26 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:56:08 +0200
> Francis Moreau пишет:
>
>> On 06/11/2015 06:23 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 15:15 +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Doe
On 06/11/2015 06:23 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 15:15 +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Does ntpd service really need 'After=network.target', not sure.
>
> The 'network online' targets are really just there for ignorant servic
On 06/11/2015 01:40 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>$ systemd-analyze critical-chain
>>>>
>>>>graphical.target @7.921s
>>>> multi-user.target @7.92
On 06/11/2015 02:22 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>> On 06/11/2015 01:40 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Francis Moreau
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
On 06/11/2015 01:40 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>$ systemd-analyze critical-chain
>>>>
>>>>graphical.target @7.921s
>>>> multi-user.target @7.92
Hi,
On 06/11/2015 12:44 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm interested in optimizing my boot time on my laptop.
>>
>> So I looked at the big picture first:
>>
>>
Hello,
I'm interested in optimizing my boot time on my laptop.
So I looked at the big picture first:
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 3.994s (firmware) + 7.866s (loader) + 8.226s
(kernel) + 7.921s (userspace) = 28.007s
and noticed that the boot time spent in userspace is quite high.
On 12/10/2014 10:19 AM, Francis Moreau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/10/2014 07:23 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
>> On Tuesday 09 December 2014 at 17:25:48, Francis Moreau wrote:
>>> Hello Lennart,
>>>
>>> Thanks for answering !
>>>
>>&g
Hello,
On 12/10/2014 07:23 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 December 2014 at 17:25:48, Francis Moreau wrote:
>> Hello Lennart,
>>
>> Thanks for answering !
>>
>> On 12/09/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Tue, 09.12.14 11:
Hello Lennart,
Thanks for answering !
On 12/09/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 09.12.14 11:19, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've a very weird behaviour with systemd 217:
>>
>> # systemc
Hello,
I've a very weird behaviour with systemd 217:
# systemctl show -p Wants multi-user.target | grep network.service
# systemctl show -p Wants runlevel3.target | grep network.service
Wants= ... network.service ...
# systemctl show -p Wants multi-user.target | grep network.service
Wants=... net
On 04/14/2014 08:11 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 14.04.2014 18:16, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>> On Mon, 14.04.14 18:01, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> "gummiboot install" fails when ESP is MD RAID1 d
On 04/14/2014 06:38 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Francis Moreau
> wrote:
>> On 04/14/2014 06:16 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Mon, 14.04.14 18:01, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>>
>>>> "gummi
On 04/14/2014 06:16 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 14.04.14 18:01, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> "gummiboot install" fails when ESP is MD RAID1 device using metadata 0.9
>> or 1.0.
>>
>> I don
Hello,
"gummiboot install" fails when ESP is MD RAID1 device using metadata 0.9
or 1.0.
I don't think using such RAID for ESP would lead to issue.
Is there any reason gummiboot doesn't want to be installed on such
partition ?
Thanks.
___
systemd-devel
97 matches
Mail list logo
