Dan,
You have a great point. The weather was always a barrier for us in Utah as
well. Keep in mind, however, that since I've been living in Southern
California, I can't think of more than about 4 or 5 guys that were worth
anything at all. Keep in mind that this is on the collegiate level. C
In a message dated Wed, 14 Mar 2001 9:35:19 AM Eastern Standard Time, "nad wilson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<< although I am not saying that a qualifing meet, a la Ncaa XC, would be the
best solution, it would certainly help some out. Those in the northeast
that don't fly to California (y
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>The starter by rule is to hold the gun until all runners are set, then
fire
the gun. Not at his discretion, when they are set he is to shoot!<
The dictionary that I found nearest to my computer defines "when" as:
a. at or during the time that
In a message dated Wed, 14 Mar 2001 8:52:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< IThe starter by rule is to hold the gun until all runners are set, then fire
the gun. Not at his discretion, when they are set he is to shoot! >>
Both IAAF and USATF rules grant the starter "
Anyone who had to sit and suffer through the false starts in the M/Ws' 60 &
60H at USATF indoors in Atlanta this year should be in favor of the one
false start rule also. Just about each heat and the finals had one and the
womens' 60m final had 3! It is obvious that many athletes are trying to
g
In a message dated 03/14/2001 4:07:01 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian (who "is blind", "has a tainted view" and "ALWAYS operates from the
negative")
While I was raised to take the high ground, I will not in this case. I will
play your childish game Brian. Read my
In a message dated 03/14/2001 1:34:09 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You hold the runners longer than they'd like and you throw them out if they
violate the gun. QED
gh
This is the best reason to use an electronic starter, that is set to a timer.
When the officials beg
Netters,
I'm a relative newcomer to HJ coaching, and I have a question. If
a jumper scrapes her shoe against the pit on the way up to the bar, but
clears the bar and it doesn't fall, is it considered a miss? This is a
matter of some urgency, since we have our indoor conference meet tomor
That rates with the proposal to time the true 100 m, without RT. Or measuring
the true jump, from the point of take off.
DGS
Faith is a road seldom traveled
The numbers say otherwise in the longer race.
We have watched the wrh and second fastest woman in the world, and they
hurdle exactly the same. They all drag their trail leg under them, jumping
the hurdle in the process. The current hurdler jumps high enough to clear
the men's hurdle (36"). Th
I did not derive these numbers these numbers were derived by Ralph Mann,
during his study of sprints and hurdles. I do not know the specifics of his
study since I was merely on the receiving end of his findings.
I do know that in all of his studies he has taken the mean of the athletes he
has
Although the discussion started out with IAAF rules, I'd like to make some
observations about hurdle height and spacing for young athletes.
Most 12-14 year old boys cannot hurdle over 39" barriers. But once a boy can
deal with the hurdle height, 3 stepping is no problem because the hurdles
are re
There won't be many more DQ's because there will be very
few false starts.
Ed
Paul Banta Wrote:
My guess is that few, if any, meet directors of
invitational meets will be in favor of going to a one false start rule in
races from 400 down. They put a lot of time, money and promotions
In a message dated 3/14/01 3:38:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>If 8 or fewer competitors, just 4 attemtps.
isn't that pretty much what happens in most HS dual meets anyway?
Jim Gerweck
Running Times
I don't know jack about hurdling ... at least
about hurdling those hurdles that fall down when you hit them
But do
all the elite hurdlers have the same leg length? Men and women?
Is
that why they decided to become sprint hurdlers ... because their legs were
exactly 122% and 100
Is it
possible that such a nation could have a
systematic doping program?
NO way. Usually a nation so dominant in a sport
DOESN'T NEED to dope. Look at all the history, the tradition, the
facilities, the environment ... those Finns don't need to blood-dope. They
are just naturally go
Actually Jim it was the Irish Government that got the
WCCC moved because they didn't want people bringing
the disease in. Not the other way around.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 3/13/01 4:06:40 PM,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >What is interesting is they said that the d
They moved the Championships because Foot and Mouth
Disease can be spread by Humans. The Republic of
Ireland has no Foot and Mouth disease as of yet and
the Irish Government want to keep it that way because
of the heavy reliance on agriculture within the Irish
Economy.
Sean
--- "Mcewen, Brian T"
Well, what do you say?
I thank everybody who answered my post. Ben Hall gave me a nice reply
which I respect him for. Dgs, Ed Parrott and others - thanks also to
you. Now it's even fun to be in the discussion! I lack time for
sufficient answers right now, but I'll be back. And just to inform you
[whatever happened to that 'superstar' named Goucher?? Maybe the
big-time contract makes him less hungry?? Maybe that's the problem with US
distance running.]
>
Thanks for filling the world in James ... but all of America who cares
already knows what 'happene
James Temp. writes:
<<
Non-paced championship races are soo different from paced GP races it
isn't
funny.
>>
While this is CLEARLY true ... the top PLACERS in a strategic championship
race and the fast-from-the-gun, rabitted ones on the Euro circuit are
usually not too different.
Loo
if you go to the iaaf site (www.iaaf.org) you'll see a new note regarding not only the
proposed false-start rule and the two-miss rule in the verticals, but also an
explanation of the trying of a few 4-attempt rule in the throws and horizontal jumps.
If 8 or fewer competitors, just 4 attemtps.
Netters:
I
think we should wait a while before introducing the women's decathlon, Nonathlon
yes, but the PV is not yet fully "integrated" into the sport to be
accepted as part of all-around competition.
' It
is not just a question of not enough irls and women being involved i
gh wrote:
> Nice numbers! I've always thought that there was also a concomitant need
for greater distance between the hurdles as well >(also for the men, but
that's another story) because of the way so many people have to chop their
strides. If they're changing >one parameter, they should change
Hello:
Read your article with interest on t-and-f, you stated:
"As it stands currently in the short hurdles the men are required to clear a
hurdle 122% higher than their leg length, and the women 100% in the long
hurdles it is 103% to 91%."
How did you derive these relative percents? What we
Garry talked about changing the distance between the hurdles (Men's 110HH).
Tom Murrell talked about "free floating" in the 4x100 meter relay.
How about "free floating" hurdle placements. Each hurdler must run 10
hurdles within 110 meters and comes to meet management with the specs on how
far ap
Those were the days. Anyone still remember Mike Fox?
G-Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> steve...
>
> i couldn't have said it any better! i can't take myself off this list though
>because I need to stay in the "loop." seriously, i think
The current spacing between hurdles is 30 ft for the men and 27.9 ft for the
women. This requires the men to scrunch their strides to 90%, which
translates to 77% of their sprint stride, and the women have to scrunch to
94%, which is 85% of their sprint stride. If we were to open the spacing up
My guess is that few, if any, meet directors of
invitational meets will be in favor of going to a one false start rule in races
from 400 down. They put a lot of time, money and promotions into getting
the best sprinters and hurdlers to their events and wouldn't want to see them
disqualified
In a message dated Wed, 14 Mar 2001 1:29:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, "Paul Banta"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<< I'd leave the rule the way it is now. If the IAAF really believes it has
tochange the false start rule, thenit should consider charging the first false start
to the field wit
I believe the change in the 4x100 relay zones is not to add
10m to the existing passing zone, but to combine the current acceleration
zone (10m) and passing zone (20m) into one 30m zone. In other
words, there would be a 30m passing zone with no additional acceleration
zone - the outgoing runner s
Does anyone know if Bryan Bronson has a comeback planned?
Bob Bettwy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Director - Program Control
Washington Group
SRS Technologies
(703) 351-7266
P.S. This is NOT a drug related post!
from the SF Chronicle
"C.J. Hunter, world shot put champ, retires rather than take a two-year suspension
after testing posiitive *four times* for steroids last summer. If you ask me, Hunter
is crazy to quit now, when's within reach of Ben Johnson's World Record."
In a message dated Wed, 14 Mar 2001 9:12:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, "Conway Hill"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<< I don't get it either ... Why change the false start rule ??? To copme into
conformity withthe NCAA ??? They need to be more concerned with making sure
that starters are less rel
In a message dated Wed, 14 Mar 2001 12:39:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< The women's hurdles need to be raised because as the heights currently
stands, very little hurdling is required of the women. This is very
prominent in the 400ih.
As it stands currently in
Coming off the field after her 4th-place finish at the World Indoor, Stacy Dragila was
asked what went wrong. Her succinct retort: "I was shit."
gh
this is not to be confused, however, with the disease apparently afflicting Dr.
Ljungqvist, foot-in-mouth disease.
gh
The women's hurdles need to be raised because as the heights currently
stands, very little hurdling is required of the women. This is very
prominent in the 400ih.
As it stands currently in the short hurdles the men are required to clear a
hurdle 122% higher than their leg length, and the women
As is so often the case these days, many people seem to
insist upon the polar extreme in response to an extreme.
How about this race? Strength runners with weak kicks try to
wear down the sprinters. The sprinters try to keep the pace
slow. Someone with guts takes it out hard with the help of
a
Why not have just two rules?
(1) The baton must travel from the start to the finish line.
(2) No more than four runners can be on a relay team.
If Michael Johnson can singlehandedly defeat a four-man
relay team from some small country, so be it!
Tom Murrell wrote:
> Why not give each runner a fixed starting point (100, 200 & 300 meters or
> 80, 180 & 280) and let them pass where ever they wish. Do away with zones,
> let them pass it wherever but they must pass it.
>
> Tom
>
What is wrong with the event the way it is? I haven't heard
--- Ed & Dana Parrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More to the point, the women's 100m hurdles is so radically different
> from the men's hurdles that it might as well be a different event.
It is. 100m vs. 110m. :-)
Dan
=
http://AbleDesign.com - AbleDesign, Web Design that Can!
http://Run-
UG write:
> But why also raise the height of the hurdles? Women are on average a few
> inches shorter than men and it make sense to take this into consideration
> and allow them to clear lower hurdles.
Women are on average 4-6 inches shorter (I don't have exact figures).
That's why the hurdles s
Why not give each runner a fixed starting point (100, 200 & 300 meters or
80, 180 & 280) and let them pass where ever they wish. Do away with zones,
let them pass it wherever but they must pass it.
Tom
> From: "Conway Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Conway Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date
In a message dated 3/14/01 9:12:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>The one falsel start rule
>hasn't improved the NCAA nor California High School Sprinting ...
>
No? At least in the East, I don't see any of the BS that goes on at Open
races, with their innumerable false starts. There is maybe O
although I am not saying that a qualifing meet, a la Ncaa XC, would be the
best solution, it would certainly help some out. Those in the northeast
that don't fly to California (yes I am talking about my team) have trouble
qualifying for Ncaas. Most if not all of our meets come in cold and win
I don't get it either ... Why change the false start rule ??? To copme into
conformity withthe NCAA ??? They need to be more concerned with making sure
that starters are less reliant on that "beep" in their ear, as eveidenced in
last years Olympics and US Olympic Trials .. The one falsel start
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/13/sports/13FINN.html
By EDMUND L. ANDREWS
HELSINKI, Finland, March 10 — The systemic doping of Finland's most elite
athletes might not have been discovered but for a misplaced medical bag
packed with syringes, needles and drugs used to manipulate blood-cell coun
Uri,
I am not sure you have read my follow-up post to Mats. From your comments
and copy below I don't think you have.
My point in that post was that my perception of Dr. Ljungqvist can only be
informed by the information I have about him which, in this case, comes from
his quotes in the media.
Mats,
Thanks for expressing all my thoughts about this issue - you managed to do
this even though I have never spoken to you and do not remember ever meeting
you (I did attend the 1995 Goteborg WC and the preceding scientific
Congress, so maybe we have met there, but do not realize it).
I am cur
But why also raise the height of the hurdles? Women are on average a few
inches shorter than men and it make sense to take this into consideration
and allow them to clear lower hurdles.
UG
__
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAI
Garry, you must be kidding, it was a bore which also gets the distinction of
a men's "World title" won in a time slower than the women outdoor world
record...
Uri
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13,
Come on, Arne Ljungquist is no McCarthy. You have never met Arne, have you?
. He is a previous outstanding high jumper, a physician, a thinker, a man
who loves athletics ( and loves athletes, and believe me, he despises no
one, including Americans). And nothing is further from him than witch hunt.
53 matches
Mail list logo