2013/2/7 Greg Troxel :
>> better use always "building" for the building and
>> "railway=station" for the station (function)
>
> I'm sympathetic to that, but what tag goes on the building way other
> than building=yes to denote that a building is a station building? Or
> was?
currently there are
Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
> 2013/2/7 Greg Troxel :
>> ... because in the present, railway=station means the
>> site and we don't really denote the building. In the historic:,
>> railway=station is the building and railway=station_site is the place.
>
>
> -1, better use always "building" for t
2013/2/7 Greg Troxel :
> ... because in the present, railway=station means the
> site and we don't really denote the building. In the historic:,
> railway=station is the building and railway=station_site is the place.
-1, better use always "building" for the building and
"railway=station" for th
Steve Bennett writes:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jonathan Bennett
> wrote:
>> There was this discussion on talk-gb recently:
>>
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2013-January/014376.html
>
> Yeah, that's actually what prompted this discussion - I was pointed
> there by
fly writes:
> I was trying to get a common tower preset working for JOSM [1], when I
> started reading about the terms on wikipedia (english).
>
> As I am not a native speaker, I like to ask natives about there
> thoughts but as far as I understood it.
>
> What we call man_made=mast is still a t
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> There was this discussion on talk-gb recently:
>
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2013-January/014376.html
Yeah, that's actually what prompted this discussion - I was pointed
there by Andy Allan when I commented on some O
Hi
I was trying to get a common tower preset working for JOSM [1], when I started
reading about the terms on wikipedia (english).
As I am not a native speaker, I like to ask natives about there thoughts but as
far as I understood it.
What we call man_made=mast is still a tower and man_made=ante
Makes sense. So we're back to amenity.
Something like amenity=shelter + shelter_type=field_shelter + (if
necessary) access=private should cover it.
Martin
2013/2/6 Alberto :
> I'm against animal=shelter. As emerged in previous discussions, an animal is
> not a shelter.
> It exists amenity=animal
I'm against animal=shelter. As emerged in previous discussions, an animal is
not a shelter.
It exists amenity=animal_shelter [1] for large structures with a staff that
takes care of animals and that eventually heals them.
On taginfo already exists animal=shelter, and in many cases it has been used
2013/2/6 Martin Simon :
> -1 for tagging it as amenity=shelter.
> We also don't do that with carports, garden sheds or dog houses.
> The object tagged amenity=shelter should imho be intended and usable for
> sheltering humans against bad weather and be freely accessible.
Agree to a certain degree
-1 for tagging it as amenity=shelter.
We also don't do that with carports, garden sheds or dog houses.
The object tagged amenity=shelter should imho be intended and usable for
sheltering humans against bad weather and be freely accessible.
-Martin
2013/2/6 Martin Vonwald
> 2013/2/6 Martin Kopp
2013/2/6 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> So trying to remove ambiguity as much as possible you could tag this:
>
> building=field_shelter (or building=roof, layer=1)
> amenity=shelter
> shelter_type=field_shelter
Except for the building, that was my first idea. In my opinion it
would fit the description o
2013/2/6 Philip Barnes :
> I would go for building=shelter rather than amenity.
>
>
> Amenity would imply it is available for anyone passing with a horse to take
> shelter.
I think this would put more implication into amenity than what it
practically has in OSM (see e.g. amenity=parking, access=p
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Martin Vonwald wrote:
> 2013/2/6 Dudley Ibbett :
>> The other problem with mapping some of these is they are often designed to
>> be mobile to get round planning rules.
>
> Correct!
>
>> I'm not sure I'd map this mobile type as it will probably/should move in the
>>
On 06/02/2013 00:50, Greg Troxel wrote:
> (I
> am also curious if a British railroad geek could explain if the OSM
> terms seem right to the railfan community.)
There was this discussion on talk-gb recently:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2013-January/014376.html
_
2013/2/6 Philip Barnes :
> I would go for building=shelter rather than amenity.
>
> Amenity would imply it is available for anyone passing with a horse to take
> shelter.
Actually if amenity is not a good choice I would rather go for
animal=shelter instead of building=shelter. Maybe the key animal
I would go for building=shelter rather than amenity.
Amenity would imply it is available for anyone passing with a horse to take
shelter.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 06/02/2013 9:00 Martin Vonwald wrote:
No, they are definitively not stables. Differently to a stable the
horse can go in
2013/2/6 Dudley Ibbett :
> The other problem with mapping some of these is they are often designed to
> be mobile to get round planning rules.
Correct!
> I'm not sure I'd map this mobile type as it will probably/should move in the
> next year!
I only think about field shelters that are _not_ mob
Sorry, but the picture is not a stable. It is, in the UK, a field shelter.
The other problem with mapping some of these is they are often designed to be
mobile to get round planning rules. The image is a mobile version. There have
been previous discussions on this, so you might want to searc
No, they are definitively not stables. Differently to a stable the
horse can go in and out as it pleases. They are usually placed in the
field as protection from bad weather. An example of a field shelter
can be seen here: [1] You definitively don't call them stables ;-)
Martin
[1]
https://pica
Are they not stables? Am not sure about amenity, that implies public use.
I would suggest building = stable.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 06/02/2013 7:03 Martin Vonwald (imagic) wrote:
Hi,
Are there any arguments against using amenity=shelter +
shelter_type=field_shelter for field shel
21 matches
Mail list logo
