On 09/09/19 11:23, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Would you also tag the area as hazardous / contaminated?
Unfortunately I think that is a default condition. All the more reason
to map them with suitable tags.
___
Tagging mailing list
Also see Singapore: it's an island, city and country. And more?
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q334 - instance of
Q3624078 sovereign state,
Q133442, city-state,
Q112099 island nation,
Q515 city
Q2264924 port city
Q6256 country
It looks like there is a separate entry for the main island:
Creeks and rivers are tricky, since it's hard to confirm whether or
not they are good for swimming. Tagging sport=swimming on certain
nodes of a river or stream is sort of like a review or recommendation,
and these are not good for the main OSM database.
The linked page says
Would you also tag the area as hazardous / contaminated?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Looks good Joseph.
One question, thanks, which has just come to mind while I was updating
details on a camp ground.
You have swimming_pool=yes/no to say whether the camp ground has a pool or
not.
The place I'm working on (& others that I know) doesn't have a swimming
pool, but is on the banks
>> Which OSM object will be the real "Monaco"?
> Relation 1124039 should be the only one with the wikidata tag.
> It's the only one that represents the country (boundary=administrative +
admin_level=2), which the wikipedia article is about.
> Relation 2220322 is a city (place=city). Wikipedia
From a current posting on the HOT list is for Open Deification Areas.
Quote: "Open Defecation, people going to the toilet in the open,
specially in dense urban areas. Open defecation areas ODA are use by
about 850 million people. If they each use 10 different areas a year
then that is 8.5
Several new and existing property and feature tags for campsites,
caravan sites, camp pitches, picnic sites and related tourism features
are now open for voting:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Campsite_properties
Main changes:
- Deprecate booking=* (use reservation=*
ned, 8. ruj 2019. u 23:17 Imre Samu napisao je:
> the 1:1 relationship is not so easy.
> What is your proposal for Monaco (Q235) ?
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q235
> now: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/wikidata=Q235#overview
> - 2 nodes
> - 3 relations
> Which OSM object will be the
The correct value for WIFI access is "internet_access=wlan" - this is
distinct from cellular internet or a wired connection
("internat_access=wired"). See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:internet_access
" there are global tags that don't need to be applied to
each individual camp_pitch.
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 01:12, Ruben wrote:
> Proposal for opening_hours syntax element "appointment", similar to "open"
> and "off":
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Opening_hours:_standard_appointment_syntax
Not a bad idea at all, Ruben.
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 06:13,
Thanks for the proposal,
> I think we should consider having a hard rule of "A Wikidata item cannot
be connected to more than one OSM item".
the 1:1 relationship is not so easy.
What is your proposal for Monaco (Q235) ?
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q235
now:
I think that it is fine to repeat
Wikipedia link
(so probably also its Wikidata equivalent)
in some cases:
- streets with Wikipedia article
- structure that combines for example footway bridge and Weir- beach with
Wikipedia article split into parts
due to differing surfacesetc
8 Sep 2019,
On 08.09.19 18:26, Janko Mihelić wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 15:05 Janko Mihelić wrote:
> "*A Wikidata item cannot be connected to more than one OSM item*".
[...]
> If one wants to tag all route segments with a wikidata tag, I
> propose a general usage "*part:wikidata=**" which would
On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 at 20:24, Rob Savoye wrote:
> On 9/8/19 1:09 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> > Also, cellular connectivity changes as operators add towers or
> > reconfigure existing ones. There's also the consideration of whether
> > there's 2G, 3G, 4G or 5G. Probably best left to one of the
>
Isn't this semantically in the end not the same as "unknown" (as in any
application would have to equate this to "you have to inquire if it is
open")?
Am 08.09.2019 um 17:10 schrieb Ruben:
> Proposal for opening_hours syntax element "appointment", similar to "open"
> and "off":
>
>
On 9/8/19 1:09 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
> Also, cellular connectivity changes as operators add towers or
> reconfigure existing ones. There's also the consideration of whether
> there's 2G, 3G, 4G or 5G. Probably best left to one of the
> dedicated cellular mapping apps such as cellmapper
On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 at 19:55, Rob Savoye wrote:
>
> I agree it's trivial data, and probably the wrong tag. I was trying to
> cover cases were an individual camp_pitch may have a cell connection.
> Especially in widely distributed camp spots in the more remote parts of
> the western US, I
On 9/8/19 12:46 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
> So a campground owner is going to put Faraday cages around certain
> pitches to ensure
> they cannot receive WiFi? Or is going to put very restricted-range WiFi
> points on certain
> pitches? Or is going to run ethernet cables to some pitches but not
On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 at 19:38, Rob Savoye wrote:
>
> For camp_pitch:
>
[...]
> internet_access=yes/no
>
So a campground owner is going to put Faraday cages around certain pitches
to ensure
they cannot receive WiFi? Or is going to put very restricted-range WiFi
points on certain
pitches? Or is
For what it's worth, I think your proposal makes sense.
Polyglot
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 6:28 PM Janko Mihelić wrote:
> Has no one any opinion on this? I have a feeling this is important for the
> future of the Openstreetmap - Wikidata relationship..
>
> Janko
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 15:05
I've been wondering about the proper way to tag camp_pitches and
camp_sites to avoid bloat and duplication. It seems to me that within
most campgrounds, there are global tags that don't need to be applied to
each individual camp_pitch. And that each camp_pitch within that
camp_site should only
Has no one any opinion on this? I have a feeling this is important for the
future of the Openstreetmap - Wikidata relationship..
Janko
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 15:05 Janko Mihelić wrote:
> Last year there was a little discussion about unique wikidata ids in the
> openstreetmap database:
>
Proposal for opening_hours syntax element "appointment", similar to "open" and
"off":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Opening_hours:_standard_appointment_syntax
Kind regards
Ruben
___
Tagging mailing list
Hi everyone
Le sam. 7 sept. 2019 à 02:06, Joseph Eisenberg
a écrit :
> Because most mappers only add 1 tag to each new object. (Folks like
> you and me are an exception - and a year ago, when I was new at this,
> I only usually added 1 tag per feature). If an object can be described
> with one
On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 at 10:09, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> In cases for usage apparently contradicting the building type it often
> helps the fellow mapper to
> tag a note that this school building was converted into a hostel, or this
> church building is used
> for climbing now.
>
Good idea. A
If there's a horse riding arena with a roof (with 2 or 3 open walls)
that covers just the riding area, I would probably map a single closed
way with building=roof + leisure=pitch.
If there are other areas under the same roof, like bandstands to watch
the show and changing areas or toilets, it
dieterdreist wrote
> you might want to refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nudism
> as suitable combination.
The difference with the nudism=* key though is that leisure=sunbathing is
supposed for tagging of a self-sufficient area which may be a part of some
larger area like a beach
On 08.09.2019 11:41, Warin wrote:
> On 07/09/19 19:08, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> sent from a phone
>>> On 7. Sep 2019, at 09:28, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>>>
>>> Per taginfo, building=yes is used 7500 times with leisure=pitch, and
>>> covered=yes is used 1017 times, so I suppose it's
On 07/09/19 19:08, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 7. Sep 2019, at 09:28, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
Per taginfo, building=yes is used 7500 times with leisure=pitch, and
covered=yes is used 1017 times, so I suppose it's more common to match
the pitch with the same outline as
On 07.09.2019 11:00, Frederik Ramm wrote:
It is true that this is the canonical way of dealing with things,
however it would be interesting to check how mappers and editing tools
actually use this. We might well find that everyone is confused about this.
[...]
I think we cannot simply throw the
31 matches
Mail list logo
