When I lived in a suburb of Minneapolis, we had this bridge that everyone
graffitied. Some of it was typical trash, but others were works of art,
including Prince on a motorcycle. About the same time out came Prince's
album, Graffiti Bridge.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graffiti_Bridge_(album)
Trying to tag this outdoor stage:
https://hota.com.au/hota-precinct/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-28.00213/153.41696
(Best image is off Maxar Premium if it doesn't come through?)
The photo is of the outdoor stage (the actual stage itself is behind the
closed doors), with a roof over
On 7/1/20 18:03, António Madeira wrote:
> What is the criteria to tag a graffiti?
> Since there's no wiki for this type of artwork, the only information
> that exists is "A notable graffiti work", here:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:artwork_type
>
> So, what is a notable graffiti? A
Well, depends on what you consider a mural to be. The distinction
between a mural and a graffiti should also be better defined.
A mural can be any painting or artwork apllied on a wall, indoors or
outdoors.
I would say that an outdoor mural is always a graffiti if it is painted.
Às 21:21 de
Yes, these are the two main issues regarding this tag: subjectiveness
and permanence.
Maybe a wiki could help and clarify what is a "notable" one.
This question arose in the Portuguese Telegram channel, where someone
was tagging pokemon paintings he himself did around his city. Some of
them are
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 01:02, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> it’s a qualifier that is highly subjective as noted by Paul. The criterion
> is *you*. If you believe it should be mapped, then do it.
>
> Add an image= tag if you like, and if you are going to add further detail
>
And it's also, like
sent from a phone
> On 2. Jul 2020, at 01:18, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> How would you tag your example? It doesn't really seem a good fit for
> any tag we have.
I don’t know the specific place, but typically I would tag
amenity=fast_food
cuisine=kebap
It also says “pizza” but from looking at
sent from a phone
> On 2. Jul 2020, at 01:05, António Madeira wrote:
>
> What is the criteria to tag a graffiti?
> Since there's no wiki for this type of artwork, the only information
> that exists is "A notable graffiti work", here:
it’s a qualifier that is highly subjective as noted by
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:18 AM Paul Allen wrote:
> I can't let Britain down in the bizarre food vendors contest. A butcher near
> me sells various types of raw meat (obviously). There are also racks
> outside on the pavement: a rack of fruit and a rack of vegetables. I was
> informed a few
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 00:05, António Madeira wrote:
>
> So, what is a notable graffiti? A signed one? A big one? An authorized one?
>
Notable graffiti is graffiti that people take note of. It's as simple as
that.
It's subjective. Do you think it ought to be mapped, for whatever reason?
Then
Funny that you mention. I've just read the Hungarian interpretation of
a legal advisor regarding what counts as seating. They were
differentiating between the sit down amenity kind and the
takeaway-only shop kind of cukrászda from a tax perspective.
According to them, in order for a _service_ to
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 23:59, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> On 2. Jul 2020, at 00:44, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> I cannot deny the possibility, but I have never seen a takeaway
> kebab shop with seats for queuing customers.
>
>
> typical configuration in such places around here is a board (“table”)
What is the criteria to tag a graffiti?
Since there's no wiki for this type of artwork, the only information
that exists is "A notable graffiti work", here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:artwork_type
So, what is a notable graffiti? A signed one? A big one? An authorized one?
There are
sent from a phone
>> On 2. Jul 2020, at 00:44, Paul Allen wrote:
> I cannot deny the possibility, but I have never seen a takeaway
> kebab shop with seats for queuing customers.
typical configuration in such places around here is a board (“table”) attached
to the wall and bar stools. You
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 23:21, bkil wrote:
> Again, I still don't have enough information about your "takeaway"
> places, but if you are not satisfied with takeaway=only + capacity=0,
>
I'm not that bothered about fixing it. I was putting it forward as an
example of the way we tag
sent from a phone
> On 2. Jul 2020, at 00:21, bkil wrote:
>
> I can see someone started experimented with
> amenity=restaurant + restaurant=diner
>
> And:
> amenity=fast_food + fast_food=van/truck/street_kitchen
to keep this straight, these are long tail values, 77% of all fast_food values
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 23:11, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
takeaway oriented kebab place may still have one or two seats
> (either for waiting customers or maybe for a legal reasons)
> that are extremely rarely used
>
I cannot deny the possibility, but I have
Again, I still don't have enough information about your "takeaway"
places, but if you are not satisfied with takeaway=only + capacity=0,
could it be also solved via subtagging?
I can see someone started experimented with
amenity=restaurant + restaurant=diner
And:
amenity=fast_food +
Jul 1, 2020, 23:30 by pla16...@gmail.com:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 22:10, Jarek Piórkowski <> ja...@piorkowski.ca> > wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, but we're being told that British takeaways are very different
>> from other casual food places that have seating
>>
>
> A takeaway doesn't have seating.
>
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 22:10, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>
> Yeah, but we're being told that British takeaways are very different
> from other casual food places that have seating
A takeaway doesn't have seating.
and the provision of seating is of key interest to Paul.
>
Yep. If you're on foot
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 21:54, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> > On 1. Jul 2020, at 02:29, Paul Allen wrote:
> >
> > Few people would want to stand
> > in a queue while raw food is cooked for them.
>
> You have been writing a lot about cooking raw food,
When talking of cafes, yes. Especially
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 16:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 02:51, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>> Do we want to introduce new tags for gastronomical service places? If
>> yes, so far takeaway has one of the clearer definitions I've seen, so
>> we could start there.
>
> we already
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 13:34, Paul Allen wrote:
>
>> Eh, as opposed to retagging coffee shops or McDonald's being feasible?
>
> Indeed. That was my point. There's a lot that doesn't work well, but it's
> too late to fix it with retagging.
To give some numbers, wrt McD
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 02:51, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>
> Do we want to introduce new tags for gastronomical service places? If
> yes, so far takeaway has one of the clearer definitions I've seen, so
> we could start there.
we already have the quite established tag
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 02:29, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Few people would want to stand
> in a queue while raw food is cooked for them.
You have been writing a lot about cooking raw food, but regular restaurants
also use a lot of ingredients that have been precooked, typically
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 20:00, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> > On 1. Jul 2020, at 12:55, Paul Allen wrote:
> >
> > Of
> > course, most people in the UK don't know that and just stick up a
> > house name or change an existing one without approval. Other
> > jurisdictions may not require
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 12:55, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Of
> course, most people in the UK don't know that and just stick up a
> house name or change an existing one without approval. Other
> jurisdictions may not require approval.
it does not mean we can not recognize the
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 04:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Highly likely these are errors. However it is not impossible that a number
> could be used as a house name.
can you give an example?
By which definition a number written as number can be a „name“?
If
>> > Shop=pastry?
>> >
>>
>> Unfortunately we can't use that tag, as the menu of a cukrászda far
>> exceeds the definition of what the word "pastry" implies. They usually
>> offer many items from the following categories:
>> * cakes
>> * cookies
>> * custards
>> * doughnuts
>> * frozen desserts
>>
Jul 1, 2020, 13:49 by ajt1...@gmail.com:
>
> On 30/06/2020 14:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>> We have 15000 addresses such as addr:housename=3 (
>> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VBS )
>>
>> Is there some chance that any of them is valid? Because it seems to me that
>> editors
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 13:54, bkil wrote:
>
> > It would need guidance in the wiki as to where the line is between a
> > coffeehouse (or whatever we call it) and a cafe that isn't a coffeehouse.
>
> Yes, that should be a good idea before someone submits a grand
> unification proposal.
>
We need
> The only possible downside I see is that it requires more carto code if you
> want different icons. But that would be necessary however we did this.
>
Possibly. But if part of the world already uses amenity=café for
places that do not primarily focus on coffee, this icon revision based
on
On 30/06/2020 14:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
We have 15000 addresses such as addr:housename=3 (
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VBS )
Is there some chance that any of them is valid? Because it seems to me
that
editors should complain about addr:housename with just numbers.
Any?
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 01:51, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 20:28, Paul Allen wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 01:02, Jarek Piórkowski
> wrote:
> >> Maybe tag them amenity=takeaway
> >
> > Good idea. Except that value is not officially agreed and isn't
> > rendered. Are you
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 03:10, bkil wrote:
> So just a quick idea, what do you think if we subtyped amenity=café?
>
On first thought, sounds good. I reserve the right to change my mind later
(it's possible some problem will occur to me), but right now I like it. It
means
you can map something
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 03:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Highly likely these are errors. However it is not impossible that a number
>
> could be used as a house name.
>
>
Not impossible. But very unlikely. In the UK, you're meant to get your
house name approved by the local
Hi *
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 03:16:38PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
> > On 30. Jun 2020, at 15:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> > wrote:
> >
> > Is there some chance that any of them is valid?
>
>
> IMHO not, these are likely autocompletion bloopers. I’d support
37 matches
Mail list logo
