At zoom level 4, placenames for major cities appear, but no country
names at any level.
Perhaps, there should be one for levels 4-6.
I do remember that we added a node tagged as country and name
Philippines. Do I need to add an is_in tag for every island (7100 +
high tide or low tide)?
maning
O
Hi,
As discussed in
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Talk:GSoC_Applications_2008]:
I18n of OSM pages and map tiles
* How many times should a tile be rendered: one per language
defined in the system, or one per language defined in the zone? How to
define zone
Today joined the 100rd member on the Openstreetmap Linkedin group
nice achievement guys
2008/3/2, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i have created a OpenStreetMap group on the LinkedIn network
> if you want to join and give openstreetmap more exposure follow the link
> below
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/
On 09/04/2008, Andy Robinson (blackadder) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't expressed my view too much on this aspect of late. I think most
> know that I'm an advocate of the "let it evolve" approach.
me too. it should evolve - but settling on agreed ways of doing things
does not prevent evo
Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
>Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>I've been critcised for not suggesting an alternative. So here's my
>>suggestion:
>>
>>* Continue your discussion and voting as before
>>
>>* Give yourselves a name ("OSM Tagging Task Force" or whatever) and
>>create a mailing
Lester Caine wrote:
> I repeat - WHERE are you getting that information by zooming out.
> Nothing says that this group of islands is the Philippines
They're just right and down a bit from Hong Kong, which is where the
Philippines are generally to be found.
The easy way to distinguish them f
Chris Hill wrote:
> Lester Caine wrote:
>> Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
The map looks nice. But once again it took some detective work to
establish WHERE in the world we were looking :(
>>> By "detective work" you mean, like, zooming out? :-P
>>>
>>
>>
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
>
>> The map looks nice. But once again it took some detective work to
>> establish WHERE in the world we were looking :(
>
> By "detective work" you mean, like, zooming out? :-P
No - where do you get the information on which Naga city we are looking at by
zooming ou
Maybe I am being slow but I just spotted this on Google maps:
* Add a place to the map (new)
You can see it at the bottom of the links on the left hand side.
then:
* Provide location and details using the info window on the map.
* Once you save your place, the whole world can find your additio
> The map looks nice. But once again it took some detective work to
> establish WHERE in the world we were looking :(
By "detective work" you mean, like, zooming out? :-P
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Un ordenador no es un televisor ni un microondas, es una herramienta
compleja.
maning sambale wrote:
> Beautiful!
> http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=13.62397052773088&lon=123.18169016162223&zoom=17&layers=B000F000F
>
>> > > http://gis.naga.gov.ph/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Data
>
> Thanks to IvanSanchez and the NAGA City GIS team!
>
> More work cleaning up some missing
Also, this is quite a powerful comparison:
http://geo.topf.org/comparison/index.html?mt0=googlemap&mt1=mapnik&lon=123.1866717&lat=13.6237576&z=15
way to go Google !
maning sambale wrote:
Beautiful!
http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=13.62397052773088&lon=123.18169016162223&zoom=17&layers=B
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Robin Paulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/9 Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > > maybe someone should tell the government? apparently we're all wasting
> > > > our time voting for them, and 'rough consensus' should be used to
> > > > decide who's in
maning sambale wrote:
>More work cleaning up some missing ways due to GML linestring errors.
>Still, BEAUTIFUL!
Looks really nice. But there seems to be something in the data, that
prevents rendering since the 4th.
There must have been hundreds of tries until now.
>From http://tah.openstreetmap
Nick wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Steve Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is a difficult problem - I can't think of any way to tell (from
>> existing data) whether a road is safe to cross without an explicit
>> pedestrian crossing. You can't just go on whether it is primary,
I was expecting it to first appear in osmarender but this the first
time saw it first in Mapnik.
Did I just said first 3 times?
maning
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Steve Chilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice detail.
> Already rendering in mapnik, due to super-fast turnaround of planet du
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is a difficult problem - I can't think of any way to tell (from
>existing data) whether a road is safe to cross without an explicit
>pedestrian crossing. You can't just go on whether it is primary,
>secondary, etc - th
Nice detail.
Already rendering in mapnik, due to super-fast turnaround of planet dump this
week.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=13.62464&lon=123.18707&zoom=16&layers=B0FT
Cheers
STEVE
Steve Chilton, Learning Support Fellow
Learning and Technical Support Unit Manager
School of Health and Soci
Beautiful!
http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=13.62397052773088&lon=123.18169016162223&zoom=17&layers=B000F000F
> > > http://gis.naga.gov.ph/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Data
Thanks to IvanSanchez and the NAGA City GIS team!
More work cleaning up some missing ways due to GML linestring errors.
St
On 8 Apr 2008, at 17:23, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> What? Geonames allows you to move and edit data which is overlaid
>> onto a Google Map. Go to http://www.geonames.org/maps/cities.html
>> and
>> click on a city.
>
> You're right, there's a "move" link there which I had overlooked.
> Non
On 9 Apr 2008, at 13:23, John McKerrell wrote:
> Just listened, great interview (apart from the strange tunnel
> discussion at the beginning ;-) Does make me think I should get
> another Liverpool party arranged and perhaps get on the radio to
> publicise it.
yes!
>
>
> Thanks for the multimap m
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 08 April 2008 2:31 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: OSM-Talk
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Voting
>
>Sven,
>
>> I can't remember that ULFL ever claimed that.
>
>Ok. There we go again. Nobody has claimed anything, but the fact of the
>matter is that a number of people seem to th
Just listened, great interview (apart from the strange tunnel
discussion at the beginning ;-) Does make me think I should get
another Liverpool party arranged and perhaps get on the radio to
publicise it.
Thanks for the multimap mention too :-)
On 9 Apr 2008, at 06:25, Nick Black wrote:
>
On 9 Apr 2008, at 12:37, Robin Paulson wrote:
> 2008/4/9 Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
maybe someone should tell the government? apparently we're all
wasting
our time voting for them, and 'rough consensus' should be used to
decide who's in power.
>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at
2008/4/9 Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > maybe someone should tell the government? apparently we're all wasting
> > > our time voting for them, and 'rough consensus' should be used to
> > > decide who's in power.
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Bruce Cowan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Picked up and commented/expanded on by Dan Catt:
http://geobloggers.com/archives/2008/04/08/paul-smiths-thoughts-about-ma
ps/
and a semi-thumbs-up for OSM from the Earth is Square on data comparison
between online mapping sites:
http://earthissquare.com/2008/04/08/missing-data-on-maps/
Cheers
STE
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Bruce Cowan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:57 +0300, SteveC wrote:
> > Like, er, electing President Bush, or Prime Minister Gordon Brown (no
> > election) ?
>
> I'm a pedant, but you never vote for a Prime Minister. You vote for your
> loc
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:31:02AM +0100, Bruce Cowan wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:57 +0300, SteveC wrote:
> > Like, er, electing President Bush, or Prime Minister Gordon Brown (no
> > election) ?
>
> I'm a pedant [...]
Oh, if we're being pedantic, I'd like to point out that the British
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Norbert Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 80n wrote:
>
> >I've made the following changes:
> >1) State borders are thicker
> >2) Secondary roads are narrower and the colour saturation has been
> reduced
> >3) Railway lines are a little blacker.
> >
> >What do yo
"A List Apart" does "Why Mashups Suck" and briefly mentions OSM:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/takecontrolofyourmaps
s
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Steve Hill wrote:
> I think this is the one I was thinking of: http://www.transportdirect.info
No, sorry, it was probably http://www.traveline.org.uk/
- Steve
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nexusuk.org/
Servatis a periculum, servatis
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Lester Caine wrote:
> And the problem of pedestrian routing showing things like safe
> crossing points adds another level of complexity.
This is a difficult problem - I can't think of any way to tell (from
existing data) whether a road is safe to cross without an explicit
pe
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Cartinus wrote:
> Up till now I used the "node in the road" method. But lately I have been
> thinking about how routing applications would use osm data. I doubt bus
> companies will be using osm to route their busses. But when routing for
> pedestrians, you will want to be able
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Niclas Andersson wrote:
> I've always used a node in the way to represent a bus stop. This works
> fine when there's a stop on each side of the road. Otherwise I've made
> use of the bus_direction=(N|S|E|W) tag (from
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Buses ) on the node
80n wrote:
>I've made the following changes:
>1) State borders are thicker
>2) Secondary roads are narrower and the colour saturation has been reduced
>3) Railway lines are a little blacker.
>
>What do you think?
It looks much better. Have you done the changes only for the test or are
they going
Lester Caine schreef:
> graham wrote:
>
>> Steve Hill wrote:
>>
>>> How are people tagging bus stops? I have been setting tagging nodes that
>>> are members of the way, which means they are part of the road they are on.
>>> Is this the right way to do it? It seems right since it unambig
36 matches
Mail list logo
